Daniel Hååg

Front end developer @ Bonnier News. Giraffes, fruit, music and gaming is my thing!

[Paul Walsh @Paul__Walsh]

Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that everyone in the EU will need to use the EU's app for identity authentication before being able to access or post on social media websites.

🇪🇺 As an expert in online child safety, I am here to expose the misinformation and misdirection in von der Leyen's statements.

Today von der Leyen said:

"This is not about whether children can access social media, it is about whether social media can access our children".

💡The first part is true. This isn't about children. It's about surveillance and combating political dissent. A state that can't control its own citizens is more dangerous than a state rife with criminals. The second part is a PR soundbite that politicians are using like a campaign slogan straight out of 1984.

🇪🇺"The question is no longer if children face risks online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online".

💡No. You can't give children a "safer start" online any more than you can offline. In the offline world, the government doesn't enforce curfews or ban children from entering liquor stores, bars or restaurants. That's a parent's responsibility. The digital world should be no different.

🇪🇺"The age verification app is one of the tools to get it done".

💡This is a contradiction because she also said "It won't be foolproof".

🇪🇺"It's easy to use, it is privacy preserving and it is open source".

💡The app was compromised as soon as it was released. "Privacy-preserving" age verification is an oxymoron. You can't verify a person's age without verifying their identity. Where or how that age is shared afterwards is irrelevant.

🇪🇺"This is basically about putting back the power into the hands of parents".

💡More from 1984. The EU is doing the opposite. Parents are having their authority stripped by politicians who think they know better. Many parents are capable and unaffected by peer pressure, and they know how to use parental controls to block any app classified as 13+. Some teens are safe, their parents trust them, and the state has no business overruling that trust.

🇪🇺"We don't give our children keys to the car before they have their licence"

💡Comparing an app to a car is a false equivalence used to justify mass surveillance. Governments don't decide when a young person is ready for car keys, guardians do.

💡Forcing every adult and child into a biometric checkpoint just to use an app or website is not licensing drivers. It's the state seizing everyone's keys, locking the garage, and forcing every driver to ask a private company for permission to take a drive.

💡 This is a gross, unethical overreach that strips authority from parents while imposing state sanctioned identity verification on every adult who doesn't even have a child.

💡Additionally, people who pass a test, obtain a licence and drive a car aren't forced to use an app to constantly authenticate their suitability to drive.

🇪🇺"We do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed"

💡False equivalence. We don't force every person to show ID at a shopping mall entrance just because a few people might buy alcohol with a meal at a restaurant. Some parents are okay with their 12 year-old going to the mall with friends while others aren't. Either way, it's their choice. Whatever irresponsible decisions some parents might make, every adult in the country shouldn't be forced to pay the price.

🇪🇺"It won't be foolproof"

💡This is all the proof we need to show that the EU and every government know that banning social media for teens won't protect them. When pressed by journalists about VPNs being used to circumvent a ban, politicians always state the ban isn't a silver bullet and will take time. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan went as far as to say "we know it's not the solution".

💡Either age verification works, or it doesn't. As a technical expert in this space, I can tell you there are no additional steps to take and no progress to be made. Either the approach does what it is supposed to do, or it's not fit for purpose. If they claim a bulletproof solution is coming, it can only mean one thing. They intend to ban or restrict VPNs to people who verify their identity.

🇪🇺"It will take time to invite the cultural change that is already taking shape in our society, just as it took time to outlaw drink driving, just as it took time to use seatbelts in the cars. Great change never happens overnight, but when it comes to our safety it is always worth it".

💡Comparing a social media ban and age verification to seatbelts is a completely broken analogy. Seatbelts are a safety feature that protects children while allowing them to travel in a car. A ban doesn't give kids a seatbelt. It kicks them out of the car entirely.

💡Instead of supporting parents who want to guide their own children through the digital world, this heavy-handed law strips away parental authority by banning the apps and websites that many parents are perfectly fine with and actively monitor.

💡Furthermore, enforcing these bans requires biometric age verification, which means forcing millions of adult citizens to scan their IDs, faces or credit cards just to browse the internet. That isn't a common-sense traffic law.

💡It's a digital checkpoint on every street. True safety means teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely with real guardrails and parental guidance, not burning down digital spaces for everyone under the guise of protection.

🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to ban teens from social media so every person is forced to verify their identity before they can read, share or post anything online. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous content.

🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to enforce "Chat Control" so every app has to monitor everything people say privately inside it, including apps with end-to-end encryption. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous criminals.

💡Where this ends

🇪🇺 "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever".

George Orwell, 1984.

[Mikael Grev @mikaelgrev]

Händer detta?

[BrendanEich @BrendanEich]

https://t.co/24wKEjeb7w

[Daniel Hååg @Frinsh]

@iamdevloper A lot of people are mentioning comic sans or papyrus as the best font, but has nobody considered the best option?

It's comic papyrus

[IroncladDev @IroncladDev]

I'm tired of vibe coders telling me "you're getting left behind"

I'm not taking the same path

You just want to build half-baked software that works, and that's okay

I want to master my craft and build + explore maximum-leverage developer-focused software

[sphinx @protosphinx]

AGI is not coming.

We are nowhere near AGI. What we have today is inference, not learning.

Models get trained once on huge fixed datasets, then frozen. You ask questions, they remix patterns they already saw. Nothing updates. Nothing sticks. Talking to the model does not make it smarter. It does not learn from you. Ever.

Learning is still slow, expensive - and offline.

Look at self driving. You drive around a pothole, make a U turn, and come back. The car’s AI does not learn that you just solved that exact problem. It reacts the same way every time using sensors and rules. Do this 20 times a day and it still has zero memory that the pothole exists. It just re sees it. That is why edge cases never die. There is no local learning. No accumulation.

No 'oh yeah, I’ve seen this before'

LLMs work the same way. Tell it your name and it does not remember. The only reason it looks like memory is because scaffolding keeps shoving your name back into the prompt every time and sanitizing the output.

The model itself has no idea who you are and cannot learn from interaction. It is structurally incapable.

And the scaffolding is the worst part. It is pure duct tape. Just prompts on prompts on prompts around a frozen model. When something breaks, nobody fixes learning. They add another layer. Another rule. Another retry. Another evaluator model judging the first model.

So you end up with systems that are insanely complex but mentally shallow. Debugging is hell because behavior comes from hack interactions, not a learnable core. Tiny prompt tweaks cause wild behavior shifts. Latency goes up. Costs go up. Reliability goes down. None of this compounds into intelligence. It just hides the cracks.

Until we have real persistent learning and real memory inside the system, there is no AGI.

LLMs are not built for this. You cannot prompt your way out of it. You need a totally different architecture. Yann LeCun is right.

And even then, what architecture can actually learn online, store memory, and stay stable on today’s hardware?

Best case, maybe 5-10 yrs.

Right now it is all inference. It looks magical, but the emperor has no clothes. A lot of people see it. Almost nobody says it out loud.

[BrendanEich @BrendanEich]

Google settles for $68 million after lawsuit claimed it secretly recorded users https://t.co/zLBjkyz5oM

[Daniel Hååg @Frinsh]

@jaffathecake Ooh! Interesting! Thanks for the reply :)

[Daniel Hååg @Frinsh]

Why doesn't the video element, just like the img element, support the attribute loading="lazy"?

Why are we stuck between preload="none" and loading it as an active user gesture vs synchronously loading the video?

#html #performance

[Daniel Hååg @Frinsh]

@bcherny @threadreaderapp unroll

[Braelyn ⛓️ @braelyn_ai]

c'mon bro just one more hook bro. just one more hook and we'll fix it all bro.

[Daniel Hååg @Frinsh]

@getifyX I like it!

I wish I was less hopeful about thinking that people will change their opinion and seriously ask the data brokers "What makes your legitimate interest mine?"

[hugo alves @Ugo_alves]

At the very end, when everything fades, I’ll whisper my only regret:

I wish I had watched more short-form, AI-generated videos.

[Jim Browning @JimBrowning11]

There really should be a standard for rejecting non-essential cookies instead of going through this sort of time wasting. What makes your 'Legitimate interest' mine?
No 'Reject all' option of course. Cookie control RFC anyone?

[Daniel Hååg @Frinsh]

@csswizardry Also BEM is the pattern

[Daniel Hååg @Frinsh]

@csswizardry Yes, we are using "handwritten" SASS but I want to eventually move on to postCSS without it

[Daniel Hååg @Frinsh]

@ersko Kan, kan man väl, men man måste väl vara lika källkritisk gentemot AI som med allt annat, typ, eller?

[Anton Johansson @agaton]

Calling it a “hallucination” instead of a bug is the most elegant rebrand of the AI era