FrogsDoRibbit

Nukes, planes, missiles, satellites, aerospace

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@MonacoTruther @AlexLuck9 Has happened before with nuclear weapon components mistakenly to Taiwan (2006) or Hellfire missiles to Cuba (2014). Also the 2007 Minot nuclear incident where several nuclear warheads were accidentally shipped, or anthrax shipments (2015), though those weren't contractors.

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@swedishslammer @AlexHollings52 Looks like old HALO model

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@Harpthefirst @LMSpace @SR_Planespotter One of the proposed Lockheed HALO hypersonic anti ship cruise missile designs

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@Pataramesh Al-Nabhaniyah (555?): 25° 46′ 08.4″ N, 42° 58′ 04.9″ E 
Ash Shamli (566): 27° 15′ 30.7″ N, 40° 03′ 14.4″ E

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@Pataramesh Saudi underground missile base coords
Al-Hariq (511): 23° 57′ 54.1″ N, 46° 22′ 16.7″ E 
Al Sulayyil (522): 20° 42′ 13.2″ N, 45° 35′ 41.4″ E 
Raniyah (533): 21° 03′ 00.1″ N, 42° 52′ 40.1″ E 
Al-Watah (544): 24° 12′ 53.7″ N, 44° 42′ 06.6″ E

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@ThomasR81928396 @SGTWipper1Each It's on the wiki https://t.co/qjJSTWVr7K

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@Frierengame @SGTWipper1Each AGM-181

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@NicoleGrajewski @iranidaturan It has at least 2 suspected ventilation shafts, but yes, probably not as vulnerable as Fordow's

33°42'21.74"N 51°42'35.67"E

33°42'14.98"N 51°42'18.13"E

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@TheIntelFrog @Ech0_Vane USS Roosevelt (DDG-80) isn't far away, should be in the Eastern Mediterranean

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@Archer83Able This WSMR UGF isn't that deep or hardened

33°26'11.02"N 106°25'37.94"W

compared to the ones just to the south at 33°25'14.47"N 106°25'40.11"W

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@neetintel Could be training exercise using old sites, or KSAW as a dispersal site for that exercise. Interesting that KSAW is also not far from the old ELF antenna transmitter site at Republic (46°20'09.74"N 87°53'01.01"W)

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@CarlJon20 @Aviation_Intel @DoggyCapital @planefag Roll-On Conference Capsules

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@FMover27 @Polar000077 Zircon is probably not an air-breather

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@AtomicCoyote61 Same as VPM

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@Defence_IDA This variant doesn't use the DF-ZF HGV but uses a MARV as a cost saving measure

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@BellumPaxBR @NicoleGrajewski Probable weapon would be the ~400 kiloton B61-11. Since it penetrates a bit underground, the effective yield is increased by the ground shock coupling by up to 25 times with only limited depth, so it does as much damage to bunkers as a multi megaton weapon.

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@80triph 32°47'43.56"N 71°44'04.13"E

Approximately 300m overburden

[FrogsDoRibbit @FrogsDoRibbit]

@ToughSf First pic is the older SS-9 "Scarp" aka R-36, while the SS-18 "Satan" is the R-36M that replaced it. But yes, early SS-18s (and even some later ones) did carry a single large warhead like the SS-9.