Passive investing plays a role in portfolios but actively managed funds go through periods of under and out performance. When you rebalance, this is incredibly powerful and will add to your long term returns. The lover of passives overlook this as it doesn’t fit their narrative.
@TheSecretAcct She has to buy. There’s no way out for her business. She needs performance and has to gamble.
Ruffer, obviously to a much lesser extent, had to do the same and it paid off. Their performance was awful, they were losing clients and needed to own something no one else would.
@fundhunter_co A separate point is vanguard don’t disclose the costs of owning the investment trusts in their index funds. Surely they should however this maybe.
@fundhunter_co I believe they do have to include their borrowing costs. This is why property and infrastructure trusts “reportable costs” are so high. The managers may charge 0.75% but the costs much higher.
I think we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
@fundhunter_co The business is one of investing in assets. What’s the difference between Segro and Tritax? Why should an investment trust have to include the cost of its borrowing, when Shell does not? If they do have to include the cost borrowing, should holding cash reduce their costs?
@fundhunter_co They do. It’s their reports and accounts for everyone to see. The running costs are reflected in the share price, like an equity.
The pay of the board and c suite are a headwind to Shell’s share price. If their running costs are less, the shares are worth more.