Georgios Fragkoulidis

Postdoc - Atmospheric Science, NOA, Greece

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

Is the 8.5W/m²​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ forcing by 2100 still an extreme and highly unlikely scenario?

[Climatebook @climatebookgr]

🌍🌡️ Κλιματική επισκόπηση Ιουνίου 2024 στην Ευρώπη

🔗 https://t.co/IPjiTUH0A1

[Climatebook @climatebookgr]

🌵🟤 Το φαινόμενο των ξαφνικών ξηρασιών

Άρθρο: https://t.co/lyrKwJfOzi

[Climatebook @climatebookgr]

Πως μπορούμε να προβλέψουμε το κλίμα του 2100 όταν δεν ξέρουμε τι καιρό θα κάνει σε 15 μέρες;

Link: https://t.co/ULKC6UakWS

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

Still wondering what's the point of this when registering for scientific conferences.

[Climatebook @climatebookgr]

🌡️🔴 2023: Το θερμότερο έτος στα χρονικά των καταγραφών παγκοσμίως

[ EN ] 2023: The warmest year on records

Link: https://t.co/3GO2Q2JnHI

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

@HauserSeraphine If all necessary steps to understand and reproduce a study are accessible somewhere in the main document then I'm OK. My flow is disturbed if I see numbers in a graph and don't know where they come from.

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

While research in weather and climate gets ever more technical, Methods sections in papers don't seem to get more precise. They rather get ever more dense/obscure and often hinder the reproducibility of the results. I do know it's easy to forget mentioning important yet tiny

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

@DorringtonJosh A study should also be reproducible without sharing code that may not be usable in eg 40 years time. Subjectively cutting corners in the Methods is what makes it painful for me as reader/reviewer to understand some results. What's the harm in a 10-page methodology is all I wonder

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

scroll past it. But what about those readers or the reviewers that want/need to fully grasp the origin and meaning of a study's results? Isn't it getting increasingly painful for them, when they have to guess hidden or omitted aspects of the methodology?

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

sideline the Methods after the References(!?), etc. I just wonder; is there any benefit in this? Readers that have no time or aren't keen in consuming long content will anyway stick to the Abstract. Readers not interested in a study's exact methodology, guess what, they will just

[Climatebook @climatebookgr]

Παρακαλούμε υπογράψτε για τη διάσωση του Εθνικού Αστεροσκοπείου Αθηνών:
https://t.co/mMbs2s7NXh

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

https://t.co/DC18cp6Fbj

[Mainz University @uni_mainz_eng]

Is the jet stream changing? Researchers at #UniMainz are investigating the #JetStream to assess how its decadal variations could affect the occurrence of #WeatherExtremes in Europe https://t.co/NiBiqNBd6R #AtmosphericPhysics #meteorology #climate #troposphere

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

@MarkJStatham1 @tom_b_elliot @MDPIOpenAccess Another for-profit publisher that enjoys the fruits of editors', reviewers', and authors' unpaid labor.

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

@RiboldiJacopo @glezjuanje Indeed. Plus, without this warm intrusion convection might have been weaker.

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

@RiboldiJacopo It doesn't seem so

[Georgios Fragkoulidis @GFragkoulidis]

@RiboldiJacopo I am fine with your list of characteristics, Jacopo; I need no name 😉 Btw, we should also look at the driver of the warm core. Is it just convection?

[WWF UK @wwf_uk]

⚠️🚨 BREAKING! 🚨️️️⚠️

@WWF’s latest #LivingPlanet Report highlights the stark reality that nature loss is not being halted, let alone reversed.

Fixing our relationship with nature is critical and we need urgent action to turn the tide 👉 https://t.co/TznK46P0W8

#LPR2022🌍