🚨🇬🇧🇳🇱 UK BANS DUTCH JOURNALIST EVA VLAARDINGERBROEK DAYS AFTER SHE CRITICIZED KEIR STARMER ON X
She called the PM "an evil, despicable man" for allowing migrant rape gangs to operate.
Days later, an email:
"Your presence in the UK is not considered conducive to the public good.
You cannot appeal."
No warning. No due process. No right to appeal.
For a tweet.
She pointed out the obvious: thousands of illegal migrants cross the Channel daily with no questions asked, but a journalist with no criminal record gets banned for criticizing the government.
The UK approved her travel authorization in September within minutes.
Now she's blacklisted.
The only thing that changed was her tweet about Starmer.
Source: @TCNetwork@EvaVlaar
❕ Collecting folklore about a good person without amendments is akin to baking a cake without icing.
You can't gather good folklore without amendments! #Folklore#Realizations
Watch as 88-year-old Ed Bambas receives more than $1.7 million. Social media influencer Samuel Weidenhofer started the fundraiser to help Bambas, a Detroit grocery store worker, retire with dignity.
Imagine you finally get all the power, control and wealth you dream of.
You then buy all the stuff that you salivate over. Toys, homes, experiences. All of it.
Okay.
Tough Question: Now what?
Seriously.
After the party gets old:
Now what?
Dignity
Stating yeses and noes is a basic yet the most fundamental function of one's dignity. It doesn't mean right, it communicates a stance.
So where does morality begin in dignity?
Solidarity
While the difference between solidarity and herd mentality may seem obvious, it can become confusing when exploring the realm of beliefs. It causes a fog of mind to those who experience such an unusual reflection for the first time.
How does one reflect on a campaign to find out if it's set up for hype or solidarity? Is there such thing as critical solidarity?
MIT became the first college to say no to Trump’s funding deal.
Other universities should follow and defend academic freedom, writes @MiHurleyFIRE 👇
https://t.co/17wLBfIYo2
In theory, donating a salary could serve as evidence that his participation is motivated by factors other than financial gain. But certain leaders are notoriously famous for the benefits they have received (@SpeakerPelos etc.) in addition to their salaries. That's certainly something to keep in mind.
How accurate is his statement to you?
* I can understand dark jokes about the dog treatment in the end of the video, but none of them would take this joke as an advice irl. and would call such behaviour appalling.
This question leads to one compellingly emoting case, peculiarly relevant at this current time, as if it wasn't ever relevant before:
For a virtue of sanctity, to preserve our humanity if not the humans: What is a family?
What would be your measures to
1) Prevent a demand of a response from the people who get tired to respond to every other trigger
2) Avoid a critical story to be missed and rushed past while it carries an important function