@iamjonaathaan@BBCMOTD The player has a right to choose what club he plaus for, and if he doesn’t want to play for a shady clown show that is his right
If Aston Villa fans talk about spending again please refer them to this tweet ⬇️
Chelsea sign Rogers for £117m
Middlesbrough receive £20.3m from sell on %
Villa left with £96.7m
Villa sign Garnacho with obligation to buy £42.67m
Villa left with £54.03
Villa sign Jackson £47.5m + £17.5m add on's
Villa have signed Garnacho + Jackson for Morgan Rogers and £10.97m
@Andyk23Andy@whuyusxf I dont know how much you know about football, but you actually need more than 11 players in a team. And before Solomon came in, guess who our starting left winger was
UEFA backing down on its boycott threat is self-evidently a victory for the FIFA president Gianni Infantino. And that’s a defeat for football. The widespread desire for Infantino to resign was not just about his shameful plan to sell off parts of the World Cup. The desire was to call to account a president enthralled by the rich and powerful, whose reign has seen political and commercial interference in football.
Take your pick of: Lionel Messi’s Inter Miami being parachuted into the Club World Cup; handing out a peace prize (that’s the Nobel Committee’s prerogative); the suspension of Cristiano Ronaldo’s ban so he was available for all the World Cup group stage for Portugal; and sponsored hydration breaks.
Any more? Yes. The phone-call from the White House that led to the review of Folarin Balogun’s ban; the loss of respected FIFA staff like Kevin Lamour; and the vote-winning plan to expand the 2030 World Cup to 64 which will kill qualifying, dilute further the quality of the tournament itself and reduce the number of nations that can host such a bloated event. And on it goes.
There could well be more now that UEFA appears a paper tiger. Infantino will be emboldened by Nyon’s retreat. Yes, it’s good for the players that the Women’s Under-20s World Cup in Poland goes ahead. They've worked hard to get there. It's not their fault that Infantino's actions plunged the sport into civil war. And the fact that FIFA tournaments are going ahead with a slightly sheepish European flock is particularly good for Infantino.
His supporters will be delighted. Those wavering may see UEFA blinking first and so throw their support behind Infantino. He now has more time to rebuild his support and ensure he gets voted back in when the presidential election is held in March. Four more years.
Any resistance movement within FIFA will surely melt quietly away, knowing that UEFA was not maintaining its initial, lauded firm stance. Pity. When the game needed strong, enlightened leadership to step forward, UEFA stepped back. Pity.
Yeah.. they are absolutely guilty. The entire UAE threatening UK because their cheating and money laundering club is about to be relegated to league one.
The outcome of this verdict could lead to UAE selling Man City and potentially the demise of that club forever.
@WestHam_Central No they didn’t, they just have a bunch of gullible marks. Shit could not have been more obvious, we’ve seen the exact same play time and again
@WestHamWayCom “The budgets not as big as some believed, INCLUDING ME”
That sentence broke something in me. I’m tired of feeling like the only fan with a brain. Even Ex is buying their PR poppycock?
Wtf has to happen for people to wake up and realize what we’re dealing with? National league?
Rightfully booked.
Wouldn’t be against a games ban when it’s this obvious.
What he should have done is stood up & accepted the tackle he expected never happened, to appeal afterwards was embarrassing.
But let’s not pretend it’s just Arsenal players who dive
@JamieGeorgeSpe1@TheLawless “Bowen is the best player in the history of the league”
“Taty will be a 20 goal a season striker in this league”
…
“… who says we have the players to go at Burnley!?”
🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent POINTED A GUN at a U.S. citizen, through her car window, while threatening her, in Falls Church, Virginia.
And the excuse?
They claimed she “almost ran them over.”
Except… she had a dash cam recording the entire thing.
She immediately called their bullshit:
“You are so full of shit. I didn’t almost run anyone over.”
The agent tells her, “You aren’t funny.”
She responds, “You aren’t funny.”
Then he threatens her… “Keep it up, I will arrest you.” While he has his gun aimed inches away from her.
She says, “I’m a legal citizen, for what?”
And they keep threatening her with arrest.
Then, the agent repeats the accusation that she tried to run them over.
So, she tells him, “Run you over when? I have dash cam recording. That’s a lie.”
And suddenly… they WALK AWAY.
Because if she had actually tried to run federal agents over, why did they just leave after she called their bullshit, and said she had video proving them wrong?
And just to emphasize the seriousness of what happened…
An ARMED federal agent had his GUN POINTED AT A WOMAN, through her car window, while threatening her with arrest.
Pointing a firearm at someone is an enormous use of force that should NEVER be treated casually… especially when the supposed justification is an accusation they apparently couldn’t… or wouldn’t… back up.
She wasn’t arrested.
They didn’t show her evidence that she committed a crime.
They just threatened her, pointed a gun at her, and repeatedly told her they would lock her up if she continued following them.
And the SECOND she says, “I have it on dash cam,” they WALK AWAY.
Because apparently the threat disappears when there’s a camera that can prove what actually happened.
This is exactly why people need to DOCUMENT these encounters.
Because when armed federal agents can point guns at citizens, and make accusations with seemingly no consequences, the public needs cameras.
And when they threaten you for asking, “For what?”
keep recording.