To feel emotions, you need to empathize with the characters. And for me, both of them are already a completed stage; their stories happened quite a long time ago and didn’t leave a sense of unfinished business.
@whsbvtcher Because she is a metaphor for a state of rage and a desire for revenge, and that doesn’t evoke positive emotions. Meanwhile, Loki represents reason and deliberation. Reason and common sense always evoke sympathy.
@euandredaiki@Ben_XI0 Their destruction would lead to the disappearance of the universe, not due to changes in time flows. This is not about controlling time and changes. This is about the conditions for the existence of this universe — stones are at the core of existence.
because the infant Loki simply didn’t survive on the icy cliffs. But I suspect that the director brothers aren’t creative enough to use this fact in the plot.
Loki, having deleted himself from time, doesn’t delete his adult version — he deletes himself completely, from the moment of his birth. Thor doesn’t know Loki; Odin didn’t bring him to Asgard. The stories about Jotunheim, the battle for New York — none of that ever happened,
Let me remind you, because it seems like everyone has simply forgotten about this: Loki, in order to stop time jumps, removes himself from the timeline. That is, he no longer exists in the universe, anywhere. Therefore, he is not destroyed along with the time streams or in the TV
If Marvel had at least made an effort to adhere to internal logic in its narrative about the multiverse, no one should have known Loki at all — he literally never existed from the moment he removed himself from the timeline in the first episode of the second season.
@4gusRie5tra Creo que en la segunda temporada de Loki hay un momento en el que viajan a la linea sagrada y no ocurre nada. Supuestamente esto no alteraría la linea sagrada porque siempre fue Loki. Es una paradoja.
@nWoBteamVet@ewenmind I’m really curious who this “explanation” is intended for.
The prop was created specifically, the episode was filmed, edited, and included in the film. This requires too much effort to be a coincidence.
@TearsSmilesAo3 🤷♀️ beats me. I’ll always pin the majority of the blame on him/his variants for the way things ended up. I really like HWR’s character, I love that they wrote and played him as ‘just a man’ and he isn’t some maniacal villain, but calculating and meticulous in his manipulations!
@rvrsecrets@AlenaPe41226687@RjNol From an anatomical perspective, the elephant is correct. Therefore, it’s hard to imagine that the monkey was depicted so implausibly.