Vediamo se i nostri simpatici tifosi di sinistra sanno incassare, loro che trovano anche le offese e le bestemmia gratuite sempre umoristiche e legittime…
Could Bitcoin hit $600,000 by 2029?
Veteran trader @PeterLBrandt shares his Bitcoin outlook, says further interest rate hikes would have little effect on its price, and calls XRP a “fool coin.”
“XRP can be effectively used for transactional purposes, cheaply,” he says.
Watch the new #TRADESECRETS episode with @itsciaranlyons:
00:00 - Intro
01:30 - Do you still expect Bitcoin to bottom in October?
05:30 - What negative catalyst could trigger another Bitcoin drop?
09:10 - Is $100,000 by year-end a realistic scenario for Bitcoin?
11:45 - Could Bitcoin reach $1 million by 2030?
18:00 - What is the better short-term play: AI stocks or Bitcoin?
20:30 - How would further interest rate hikes impact Bitcoin?
23:00 - Will institutional demand change Bitcoin’s boom-and-bust cycle?
25:35 - What is your current view on XRP?
28:30 - Could quantum computing threats ultimately push Bitcoin’s price to zero?
I guess a good way to put it would be this. Making a hook is a little bit like launching your own DEX easily (launchpad but for DEXes?). Great for innovation, but imagine what aggregators think when they need to support 10'000 DEXes with arbitrary code is hard.
And to quote well - they do have to actually model it off-chain. And now, on top of it, they have to figure what's bad and whatnot.
A quick review. Islam has a problem with democracy, bacon, alcohol, dogs, music, gay people, Christmas, Hindus, Jews, Buddhists, Christians, Orthodox, churches, temples, women showing hair, people leaving Islam, and those who draw Muhammad or Allah. They love polygamy, stoning, genital mutilation, women are considered equal to animals, they practice slavery, animals are slaughtered and left to bleed, boys are dressed as girls, made to dance, and molested; they marry young girls—buying them—and have "amorous" relations with them as soon as they reach puberty; and if you complain about these things, they will call you an Islamophobe. Are we forgetting something?
A historic moment in Italy: patriot Simone Carabella interrupts Islamic prayers in a park in Mestre and sings Italian national anthem; he then eats a pork sandwich, tramples on prayer mats, and orders Muslims to leave Italy, sparking chaos. Let's make this hero famous.
Antonio Gramsci – The Most Dangerous Intellectual of the Twentieth Century.
Not the most famous. Not the most read. The most dangerous and the most consequential – because he was the one who figured out why the revolution kept failing, and what to do instead. The man who invented the long march through the institutions.
Everything that followed — the Frankfurt School, the Fabian Society’s operational model, the WEF formation pipeline, the captured university, the HR department enforcing approved speech — is downstream of what he wrote in a prison cell in Mussolini’s Italy, in code, between 1929 and 1935.
1. His central question: why hasn’t it happened? The working class was supposed to rise. The contradictions of capitalism were supposed to produce the revolution. They hadn’t – not in the West. Gramsci’s answer was precise and devastating: because the ruling class does not maintain power through force alone. It maintains power through cultural hegemony – the control of the ideas, values, and frameworks through which people understand the world. The worker who accepts that the existing order is simply how things are will not revolt, regardless of his material conditions. The revolution requires cultural change first.
2. The instrument was the long march through the institutions. Not the barricade. The school, the university, the media, the judiciary, the civil service, the cultural establishment – every institution through which a civilization transmits its values to the next generation. Capture these, fill them with people who share the counter-hegemonic project, and the cultural assumptions that maintain the existing order gradually dissolve. No barricades. No visible moment of rupture. Just the slow replacement of one cultural hegemony with another.
3. The educational capture was the masterpiece. Control the curriculum and you control the categories of thought available to the next generation. Not by telling them what to conclude – by shaping what questions they think to ask, what they consider obvious and what they consider unthinkable. The generation educated after the long march does not need to be told what to think. It thinks what it was formed to think – and experiences that thinking as its own.
4. He also theorized the organic intellectual – the person who translates the theoretical framework into stories and assumptions that circulate through the culture without appearing ideological. The film that makes the existing order seem absurd. The journalist who frames every story within the approved assumptions. Gramsci understood that culture is politics by other means – and that the side that controls the culture wins, regardless of who wins the elections.
5. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a published, documented, widely taught strategy that the left implemented consciously across the entire Western world. The 1968 generation put it into practice in the universities. They became the professors, the journalists, the civil servants, the judges, the HR directors of the decades that followed. The march took fifty years. It worked.
6. Mussolini’s prosecutor said at his trial: "We must stop this brain from functioning for twenty years." The brain did not stop. It produced thirty-three notebooks – smuggled out, published, and became the most widely read Marxist text in the Western academy after Marx himself. Gramsci died in 1937, six days after his release, at forty-six. He did not see the march he theorized. He did not need to.
7. Every captured institution, every transformed curriculum, every HR department enforcing approved speech, every content moderation policy suppressing the unauthorized voice – all running the program Antonio Gramsci designed in a prison cell, by a brain that was supposed to have been stopped. It wasn’t. And neither was the march.
Until now – because the distribution monopoly that made its outcomes enforceable is cracking. The counter-march has begun. It just doesn’t have a name yet.
Normalmente no contesto directamente a tanta noticia falsa, pero esta me pareció un buen ejemplo de cómo estos “periodistas” y medios de comunicación MIENTEN descaradamente a sus lectores.
Lean este tuit, que ASEGURA que El Salvador ha transferido sus reservas de bitcoin a un privado, lo cual es TOTALMENTE FALSO.
Aquí está el enlace de la misma institución que EL PAÍS cita como fuente: el Fondo Monetario Internacional (FMI): https://t.co/o7KtcAItBw
Léanlo. Claramente dice todo lo contrario: que lo único que se transfirió fueron las acciones de Chivo, algo que se ofreció hace año y medio, y NO la Reserva Estratégica de Bitcoin.
De paso pueden leer cómo El Salvador ha logrado un superávit fiscal primario y ha superado todas las expectativas de crecimiento económico gracias a la seguridad y a la confianza de los inversionistas, además de haber alcanzado una reducción significativa de la pobreza, apoyada por mejoras en la eficiencia de los servicios públicos 😘