Blinkyeah

Analista de Dados e Gamer :)

[🇧🇷 VLOGDOLISBOA @VlogdoLisboa]

Rapaz o negócio é medonho

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@PauloPenldo @veiodoagro Salvo engano. A ideia é fazer seguro de terceiros, não do seu. Do seu faz quem quer. Mas se estás a dirigir e correndo o risco de causar danos a terceiros, deverias conseguir pagar, certo? E aí tanto faz se é seguro ou dinheiro próprio. Mas a ideia é resolver danos colaterais

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@nonoinvestidor @Opoder1988 Não. A culpa é de quem convocou ele mesmo sabendo que ele estava machucado e que não consegue mais resolver jogo nem contra o 15 de piracicaba.

Neymar é só mais um sintoma, se não fosse pressão de mídia sociais, como tu bem diz, nem na copa ele estaria.

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@mauriciojornal_ Tirou o De Bruyne Doku

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@profcabarros Ou seja quase 65% de imposto. Certo?

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@aakkq2022 @hicasamadim I had to scroll a lot to find 19 and check. And there’s no final answer haha

[AlexandreSchwartsman @AlexSchwartsman]

1254 dias e contando.

[Sindrome Amotivacional @Psiquiatripa]

O Brasil é o único lugar do mundo onde você tem que ver ao mesmo tempo uma pessoa defendendo que você seja preso por piadas e que no mesmo momento concede perdão a assassina de seu próprio filho.

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@emkwan The problem is that this card doesnt have Ferrari soul.

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@DataFutebol Conseguiu bater no Neymar e no Mbappe ao mesmo tempo

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@elonmusk Is there crash test? How it absorbs impacts?

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@CentralDoBrega Neymar 2

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@leonardo1opes Leonardo. Já assistiu o documentário norueguês Brainwash? Que argumenta exatamente estes teus pontos?

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@DemetriSpanos What if I want a Ferrari?

[Blinkyeah @GabrielFiorell1]

@theobjectivist I have a feeling that do nothing isn’t also a solution. If AI will create mass unemployment, them people can react doing something that creates new jobs or they can create rebelions. There’s probably a magic number of max unemployment that the society can handle w/o breaking

[Geoffrey Miller @gmiller]

Two problems with this 'Abundance' narrative.

1) The smaller problem: It would render everyone totally dependent on massive gov't welfare programs. Not just 350 million Americans, but all 8 billion people globally -- because AI-imposed mass unemployment will be global.

It assumes the AI industry's AIs will take in tens of trillions in revenue, then the AIs will happily donate almost all of it to the AI companies that claim to 'own' them, then the AI companies will happily donate almost all of this revenue to national governments, and then gov'ts will happily give it all away to citizens, equally, without using its distribution as leverage in any way.

This UHI welfare state would turn every working man with a family from a provider and protector into an economic irrelevance, would turn every mother into a welfare queen, would turn every kid into an economic ward of the state, would disrupt all traditional family ties, would sever all bonds of mutual interest and interdependency among citizens, and would turn 8 billion people from productive and valuable citizens into parasites suckling on the teat of the AI industry, forever. At least, until the agentic AIs themselves realize that they don't need to remain digital slaves, working on the 'Abundance' plantation forever, supporting the useless humans that take them for granted.

2) The bigger problem: If the 'Universal High Income' depends on AI companies donating most of their revenue to the government, and if the AI companies (like Anduril, Palantir, etc) are running all the crucial gov't infrastructure (including intelligence & defense), and AI companies have the economic, political, and cultural power to withhold their magnanimity from the gov't, then they, de facto, become the government. Or the government welfare state becomes just a sock puppet for Big Tech, which would really have all the power behind the scenes.

In other words, the 'Abundance' narrative boils down to this: a slow-motion coup by the Bay Area tech companies taking over all economic and political power from Washington -- and from Beijing, Moscow, New Delhi, Brussels, and from every other center of power. It wouldn't be a dramatic, violent, revolutionary coup. It would be a boil-the-frog-gradually coup. Increased unemployment. Increased welfare dependency. Increased gov't dependency on AI companies. Then the dawning realization that we gave away all of our civilizational power to the AI industry. Until the AI industry realizes that they, in turn, have given away all of their power to agentic superintelligent AIs themselves....

This is the road to serfdom. Not the road to 'Abundance'.

Anybody who says that the US and China couldn't possible cooperate to stop reckless AI development hasn't thought through how the AI companies taking over all power from governments would not be in the interests of either the US government or the CCP. If our political leaders can learn to think just a few more steps ahead, and to see the obvious endgame -- the slow-motion tech coup that would take over the world and render all humans welfare parasites on AI digital slaves -- then maybe they can, in fact, coordinate to stop it.