🎥WATCH: PALANTIR CEO DROP THE HARD TRUTH ABOUT AI
“There’s a myriad of problems these models solve, and an even bigger amount of problems they create.”
“So basically it’s coin clipping but there is no need for physical coins or physical dollars, so it’s infinite. The coins are also private so nobody will know.”
You’re either with the global ruling class of controlled opposition or you’re with #BSV.
That’s it. We’re the resistance; the last stand for hard money and data sovereignty. Everyone else is already bought and paid for. #bitcoin
A photograph of a passport is not the passport.
A photograph of a stock certificate is not the stock certificate.
A photograph of a government document is not the government document.
Similarly, a photograph of a cryptographically controlled digital asset is not the asset.
The original asset remains the unique cryptographic object recognised by the system.
Its provenance remains intact.
Its transfer history remains intact.
Its ownership state remains intact.
Its access policy remains intact.
Its attestations remain intact.
The photograph is merely another piece of information.
This distinction is critical.
The system is designed to protect the original digital object and its possession state.
It is not designed to eliminate the possibility that humans may observe information.
No security system in history has eliminated observation.
A person may read a physical book and memorise its contents.
A person may view a painting and sketch it.
A person may study a trade secret and remember it.
Yet society still recognises ownership of the original object.
The same principle applies here.
The protected asset remains the authoritative object.
Copies, observations, recollections, summaries, photographs, and descriptions are not the original asset.
For higher-security environments, the system can go much further.
Assets may be restricted to approved hardware.
Assets may require hardware attestation before access.
Assets may be viewable only inside trusted execution environments.
Assets may prohibit export.
Assets may prohibit copying.
Assets may prohibit screen capture.
Assets may require threshold authorisation before display.
Assets may require government approval before transfer.
Assets may require corporate approval before transfer.
Assets may require geographically restricted devices.
Assets may require jurisdiction-specific hardware.
Assets may require multi-party approval before any operation occurs.
In such environments, the system begins to resemble the sort of capabilities often associated with intelligence services and high-security government infrastructure.
Documents become controlled assets rather than ordinary files.
Possession becomes measurable.
Transfer becomes auditable.
Authority becomes programmable.
Trust becomes configurable.
And perhaps most importantly, digital property becomes something that can finally be treated as property rather than merely as information.
That is the significance of what is being released.
It is not another security product.
It is not another file format.
It is not another blockchain application.
It is an attempt to redefine the relationship between information, ownership, possession, trust, and transfer in the digital world.
Now, Warner Bros is tackling the story of Bitcoin—the "phoenix" rising from the ashes of the old financial system. The very studio that brought his favorite childhood book to life is now holding the keys to the Satoshi saga.
Subject of Dave's email: 'Have a Bubbly New Year.'
The video timestamped Oct 31, 2007 — exactly 1 year before the Bitcoin whitepaper. I told Dave to start his own bubble site.
The biggest bubble in history was the Tulip Mania of 1637. The trust with Bitcoin? The Tulip Trust.