Just over a week left until the biggest thing CoinPoker has ever done.
PGT Online is a first for the site: the PokerGO collaboration itself, a $250M GTD across six series spanning a full year, and a $50M Kickoff running Nov 8–30. This level of commitment and prize pool has never happened on CoinPoker before.
The app is already locked in. Good luck to everyone grinding these, this is a massive event!
1/3 "Fully licensed" sites quiet-shift accounts to Curaco when taking grey-market volume and ignore closed-loop guidance, you're panicking over an unproven Comoros political dispute?
A footer seal doesn't guarantee a site pays.Conduct does.
The Footer Test exposed:
@PokerNews
@VxzD500@spursygambles@Roobet@AllenAeroh If mistakes can happen easily surely you’d check EVERY game every 3/6 mths ? Cause this was a 7 figure sum players lost out on until a 3rd party brought it to your attention ?
What’s the plan going forward ?
1/ We investigated @500Casino’s Towers game
We found the house edge is up to 8x what they advertise, since 2023.
Advertised: 5% house edge
Actual: up to 40.13%
We estimate $3.5m–$21.6m in extra player losses over 3 years.
500 takes the 5% again on every row you climb. Captured game code, our game testing and real payouts from 2024 and 2026 all show the same paytable.
We’re asking 500 to address this publicly and compensate affected players.
Full breakdown below.
It's a little disingenuous to say this is a "issue or a bug"
Rather then something maliciously done by a website with a history of cutting corners.
Having been an executive in numerous casino projects, we would notice when a game is running many/or any standard deviations above the expected RTP..
i.e. if a 95% RTP game is registering 80% RTP over a long enough sample, we definitely notice, investigate, and clear, the same way if a 99% RTP original is returning 105%.
So you guys are negligent at best, malicious at worst... would probably guess this case is veering from willfully being negligent leading the maliciousness. Either or I would recommend, as I have for the last 3 years, no one deposits on this shithole of a site
So this guy who knows his stuff says circa 12,000 bots on @QQPKOFFICIAL
They have come out with a report stating <1000 so far
Who would you believe ?
And then where is there to play where security is paramount ? 🤔
https://t.co/3sDbVXLJv9
1/5
Online #poker security is a joke.
Latest superuser scandal: malware via third-party tools let a cheater watch high-stakes hole cards for months. Millions lost.
Most sites flat-footed. One wasn’t @CoinPoker_OFF
1/3 "Fully licensed" sites quiet-shift accounts to Curaco when taking grey-market volume and ignore closed-loop guidance, you're panicking over an unproven Comoros political dispute?
A footer seal doesn't guarantee a site pays.Conduct does.
The Footer Test exposed:
@PokerNews
@PlayCashy Your own group have engaged in nefarious activities and this is a joke that you have a “justice fund” - deal with getting your own house in order first
Poker's superuser scandal just got bigger.
WIRED reports estimated losses of $1.5M–$4M, malware exposing hole cards, and questions over how ACR, GGPoker and CoinPoker responded.
https://t.co/of1l2svxDZ
#Poker#PokerNews
FAKE SLOTS
This should be the story of the week
And real effort should be put into identifying the 5-10% deploying them - and no one should ever play with those operators again
#fakeslot#crookedcasinos#onlinecasinos
Did you know a fake slot can be switched on for one specific player...
GameCheck's Jack Crabtree says the fakes are now "seamless", and some are built with ex-provider devs.
They estimate 5 to 10% of the industry runs them.
@WifiVillian@ToddWitteles@FNfightpicks Slightly different given the amount of rogue operators - think needs more clarity than the IRS as it way too easy for an online operator to point to a broad term and hold funds
@WifiVillian@ToddWitteles@FNfightpicks Ok - but then that exact behaviour
1) Needs to be prohibited in the t+c’s
2) They should refer to the behaviour and the t+c’s
Then everything is clear and there’s no ambiguity
It’s too broad to just cite an ambiguous term.
@ToddWitteles@FNfightpicks I’m not disputing that todd that’s very prevalent in the sphere always has been - but the simple way to solve it is when something like this occurs a clear explanation coming from the operator otherwise it’s all conjecture-and that’s unfair on everybody,even the sites reputation