Golfing, pickleball-playing heretic. Populist liberal nationalist (rooted in culture and continuity). Defends liberty from Big Gov, Big Biz & Big Spin.
Not Left v Right. Instead: Radiators v Drains. Wealth Creators v Parasites. In the former camp: Enterprise; Communitarianism; Philanthropy; @elonmusk. In the latter: Socialism; Fascism; Globalism; Islamism; Boomerism; Cronyism; Bernaysism; Wokeism; @wef
@darrengrimes Reform resorting to the politics of fear, I see. I doubt we are ever voting ourselves out of this catastrophe, but if there is a vehicle with the slightest chance of achieving this (and I don't just mean winning a GE - that's the easy bit), it's Restore.
The fact that the prime minister, quite deliberately, makes it sound as if Amess was killed in a car accident, rather than what actually happened - murdered by a Jihadist - tells you all you need to know about the state's attitude to his death and its subsequent cynical use of it to introduce new censorship laws on the population. We are not governed by good people.
“STOP DOING IT AND WE’LL LEAVE YOU ALONE!”
United Minibuses and Coaches Limited is a transport company in Crawley, West Sussex.
The directors are Mumtaz Rasool and Yasmeen Rasool.
If its vehicles continue to be used to transport illegal male migrants across Britain, British people will continue to act.
This is the message to ALL transport companies getting rich off the British taxpayer.
You will be exposed.
🎥 Stripey UK / YT
@EstherMcVey1 Because he's a snake who continually lies in order to sound reasonable and charming. How many more times will the British people be taken for mugs?
Again, pre-political loyalties in Britain have been eroded by mass demographic upheaval and major ideological inconsistencies within the ‘anti-racist’ movement. MPs increasingly mobilise around race and religion. It is only a matter of time before the White population follows suit in large numbers.
@PeterMcCormack Voting won't fix it, but neither will 'public meetings, lawful demonstrations, independent investigations & legal challenges'. 'Unite the Kingdom', Restore's Rape Gang Inquiry,NCF's local networks,even Patriot Platform did NOT move the dial. Decentralized targeted chaos might.
Britain's Demographic Transformation: The Promises Broken, The Questions Never Answered
By 2027, Khan is projected to overtake Smith as the most common surname among newborns in England and Wales. According to Telegraph analysis of ONS figures, Smith has declined by 44 per cent since 1996, while Khan has more than doubled. Muhammad has also topped the boys' first-name rankings since 2023. The names themselves are not the problem. What matters is the profound demographic change they reflect, the policies that helped bring it about, and the promises successive governments made to the British electorate.
For fifteen years, governments have pledged to reduce immigration. Yet ministers repeatedly introduced or maintained policies that encouraged arrivals on a scale far beyond what voters had been led to expect. Net migration eventually approached one million annually. Nobody can seriously argue that the long-term demographic consequences were unforeseeable. Oxford University's Migration Observatory identifies two principal factors behind the changing surname rankings: immigration, particularly from South Asia, and differing birth rates.
The fertility figures deserve far greater attention. Since 2008, births to British-born mothers have reportedly fallen by 29 per cent, while births to foreign-born mothers have risen by 18 per cent. Among mothers born in Asia and the Middle East, the increase was 41 per cent. These figures raise a question successive governments have largely avoided. Why has Britain become a country where so many of its existing citizens struggle to afford children, while economic policy increasingly relies on importing workers and their families?
Housing costs, stagnant living standards, expensive childcare and insecure employment have all made family life harder. Rather than confront these failures, governments repeatedly turned to immigration as an answer to labour shortages and economic growth. The consequences extend well beyond the labour market. Immigration on this scale inevitably changes the population's composition, its religious profile, its cultural character and the demands placed upon schools, housing and public services. Whether those changes strengthen or weaken national cohesion depends partly on the pace of immigration and the success of integration.
Yet integration cannot simply be assumed. Shared citizenship requires more than living within the same borders. It demands a common language, respect for British law, acceptance of democratic institutions and a willingness to participate in the wider national community. Governments have a duty to consider how rapidly changing populations affect the society they govern.
Sunder Katwala of British Future argues that the real challenge is ensuring tomorrow's Smiths and Khans live together successfully. That is a worthy objective. But it evades the prior question: who authorised the scale and speed of the transformation? Rob Bates of the Centre for Migration Control calls it demographic change imposed without a democratic mandate. His criticism goes to the heart of the matter. Britain’s demographic transformation was not simply an accident of history. Immigration rules, visa policies and recruitment strategies were deliberate government choices. Ministers knew these decisions would have lasting consequences, even if the precise outcomes could not be predicted.
That does not prove a secret scheme to manufacture new electorate. It establishes a serious failure: successive governments pursued policies with profound national consequences while repeatedly failing to deliver the immigration control they promised. The scandal is not that Khan may overtake Smith. It is that the country was promised one future while political decisions helped deliver another. A nation cannot consent to its future when its governments fail to honour their promises about how that future will be shaped.
"Immigration on this scale inevitably changes the population's composition"
Dear British Society, You’re a real disappointment to your betters. Stop talking to each other, getting angry about stuff that is happening to you, and making up your own minds. Do better. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
🇬🇧 I live in a country that jails its people for deleted tweets and throwing empty plastic bottles.
But foreigners who rape dead women are sent to hospital.
I honesly think, from watch @andyburnham over the last few weeks, ive come to the conclusion he is not very bright.
I know he's been to @Cambridge_Uni, but to me that does not prove raw intelligence, just good at regurgitating info in the right order.
He stumbles & mis-speaks quite a lot, he forgets we have cameras & can call out his lies, he is a perfect #PeterPrinciple exemplar:
https://t.co/zA1fubTeFq