BIRTH CONTROL IS WAY WORSE THAN THEY ARE TELLING YOU 😳
Casey Means went on TCN and exposed what it really does to the female body.
Calling it a “disrespect of life” and exposing how it shuts down a woman’s “life-giving nature” which has serious repercussions that are hidden from the public.
People in the industry profiting from ‘The Pill’ are losing their minds over this, which tells you everything you need to know. She’s exactly the kind of Surgeon General we need. @SenatorCollins@lisamurkowski confirm her and give us someone in that position who is willing to fight for life!
When Candace first launched her so-called “Davidic” crusade to defend Charlie and “uncover the truth” behind his assassination, she accused me of being unfazed by his death and publicly condemned me for giving an interview to The Wall Street Journal a week later, calling my timing and tone “icky,” and insinuating that I—and TPUSA—were somehow exploiting Charlie’s death to advance our mission. (It should be noted that I was the only TPUSA contributor who declined ALL media for the first week.) Normal people don’t respond to death the way they did, she attested.
But we responded in the only way Charlie would have wanted:
(1) empowering law-enforcement allies like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino—two men Charlie himself advocated for to secure positions within this administration, to pursue justice for his killer; and
(2) working tirelessly to ensure that Charlie’s message and legacy were amplified across the globe. Exactly what that WSJ article did.
That was the beginning of Candace’s tirade against the very people Charlie called his closest friends and mentors. She’s stopped just short of outright accusing them of orchestrating his death, preferring instead to “just ask questions,” say “the vibes are off,” or otherwise insinuate what she didn’t have the courage (or legal standing) to claim directly, likely fearing another defamation lawsuit.
Candace has said she was virtually incapacitated with grief in the days following Charlie’s death—that she couldn’t bear to speak to the media about it. Yet by her own later admission, this was false. While defending her incoherent CNN interview, she excused her erratic answers by saying it was recorded “a couple of days after Charlie’s death.” (She now says it was two weeks after the assassination.)
I was icky and self-seeking for talking to the media a week after his death, to honor Charlie’s legacy, mind you. But when Candace jumps to do a CNN interview about conspiracies she started (not even honoring him) a “couple of days” after his death? She’s Charlie’s guardian angel. Cool. Makes sense!
Since then, she’s been weaving strings of “evidence” connecting Charlie’s mentors and allies (e.g., “everyone at TPUSA is involved in a coverup”) to sinister motives, all while accusing them of mismanaging or profiting from his death. Candace, positioning herself as Charlie’s self-styled “David,” claims she’s only seeking truth. But it’s become increasingly clear that she’s projecting, doing precisely what she accuses us of doing: leveraging Charlie’s death for brand awareness and personal profit.
Unlike David, however, Candace hasn’t slain a giant. She’s been sparring with a lightweight libtarded CNN reporter, and somehow still losing.
Must be hard to be a Democrat right now.... you have to be against good health, support war, oppose free speech, promote high taxes, support gun control and want open borders.
@megynkelly@ZacharyLevi Excellent interview! Much respect to both of you for the ways you shared your hearts so vulnerably and beliefs so passionately. Many lives will be touched and changed because of the truth and hope you conveyed.