@LaylaAbdalMasih@AEnjoyer447201 Not really, Bauckham is used for gospel authorship, online apologists would barely refer to him on christological issues, hurtado is even less (since he also explicitly says that Jesus didn’t claim to be god) and also says that the idea that ‘jesus is god’ does not make sense
Today I read parts of "The Gospels in Islamic Context" (2025) and came across a chapter by Ali Ataie. He argues that the canonical gospels (and the Diatessaron) are authoritative, and partly outlines how they may be interpreted consistently with Islam. Interesting contribution.
*Correction*
ISLAM
Music: sin according to some branches; according to some it is not.
Dancing: sin according to some branches; according to some it is not.
Singing: sin according to some branches; according to some it is not.
Owning a dog: not a sin; though most Muslims would suggest the dog be kept outside, which makes sense since houses are for humans.
Woman without veil: minor sin, not a major sin. There's a difference between the two in Islam.
Rape of anyone: sin.
Killing anyone who isn't guilty of murder or tyranny: sin.
You're Christian/Jewish/Buddhist: good for you.
You're gay: sinful, but no death penalty. Though there are some reports of questionable authenticity which one might appeal to in order to make a case for the contrary.
You're welcome.