During his visit to South Korea, Wang Yi urged Seoul not to take sides between Beijing and Washington.
China’s attitude toward its neighbors is actually quite simple.
If the dispute is between us, we can talk.
But the moment you invite an external power into Asia, turn your territory into its military platform, and convert a bilateral dispute into part of a containment architecture against China, the relationship changes.
That is why China can manage disagreements with countries like Vietnam, Indonesia and Malaysia while reacting far more harshly when regional states turn themselves into forward positions for U.S. strategy.
Disagreement is negotiable.
Encirclement is not.
China can live with neighbors that disagree with it.
What it will not accept is neighbors renting out Asian geography to outsiders and then pretending the consequences are still merely “bilateral tensions.”
Keep Asian disputes in Asia, and there is room to talk.
Turn Asia into someone else’s battlefield, and there is much less to discuss.
🚨#BREAKING: A grand jury has REFUSED TO INDICT an man for destroying a Flock camera in Ohio.
Cody Morelock allegedly brought down the camera, solar panel and support pole before destroying them.
A grand jury wouldn't indict him and the charges have been dismissed.
If you oppose Israel (which I do) but don't also oppose the us, Canada, Australia, nz, uk, france, Germany & The rest of the imperial core & the imperial periphery combined You are doing the empire's bidding. Their project encompasses the entire world and all of its people.
Flock takes their privacy very seriously.
But the ethical gray area in surveillance technology works both ways.
Under no circumstances should elected officials or public servants enjoy an expectation of privacy when spending tax dollars to attend a surveillance lobbying event.
✨🇨🇳A Chinese veteran in his 90s just tried a powered exoskeleton suit — and walked up stairs with ease.
“I feel decades younger,” he said. “Completely comfortable.”
Technology that truly changes lives. ❤️
Not that long ago, everyone had to repeat the mantra that Russia destroying its own pipeline was part of the “Russian playbook.” Anyone who disagreed by suggesting we use common sense was denounced as carrying water for Putin. Our societies would be less radical and gung-ho about war if we could have honest and open debates about the Russiagate hoax, NATO expansionism, and the costs of not allowing dissent.
When federal agents seized my phones at Dulles Airport, they flagrantly violated several 4th circuit rulings which explicitly forbid advanced forensic searches of devices without a warrant or individualized suspicion.
Was the order to seize my devices delivered under pressure from unregistered Israel and Ukraine lobbyist Laura Loomer, who boasted about calling Trump cabinet officials to demand I be jailed for my reporting from Iran, and effectively took credit for the confiscation of my devices?
We're filing this lawsuit to answer that question, and to prevent the unconstitutional weaponization of federal law enforcement against journalists whose reporting complicates their malign, Israeli-directed agenda.
There has been a lot of replies (especially from Japanese accounts) stating Article 107 of UN Charter is obsolete and there was a General Assembly (GA) resolution for this in 1995
Amending any part of the UN Charter requires a two-thirds vote in the General Assembly followed by ratification from two-thirds of member states—including all five permanent members of the Security Council (the US, UK, France, Russia, and China) under Article 108
The fact that the GA resolution was never voted in SC after 31 years means that the Article 107 is still part of the UN Charter today in 2026. Unless SC has a resolution to amend that, Article 107 still remains within UN Charter
💬 #Zakharova:
At the 1945 Yalta Conference, the USSR agreed to join the fight against militaristic Japan, while the US & Britain agreed to the transfer of the Southern Kuril Islands to the USSR.
@USAmbJapan is encouraging Japanese revisionism.
https://t.co/LOBPMshCj9
🇯🇵 PM Takaichi has now lined up Japan in a crashing course against 2 powerful neighbors 🇨🇳 🇷🇺 . Her Administration recent clash with Russia led to Lavrov to mention UN Article 107 Enemy Clause once again
Lavrov noted that Japan was originally designated as an enemy state in the UN Charter and only joined the organization after expressing regret for its wartime actions against several nations. He expressed hope that Japanese officials would thoroughly review the Charter, especially Article 107, before signing it.
Article 107 grants the Allied powers of World War II the authority to take any measures against enemy states, including Japan, without requiring UN approval.
https://t.co/6BchPAWGhl
The Chinese Foreign Ministry’s response to the Japanese government’s performance on the anniversary of Japan’s defeat in World War II was simple:
Spare me the fucking performance.
Japan knows how to bow.
It bows to the power that defeated it.
It bows at Western war memorials.
It bows before the alliance that now protects it.
But toward the Asian peoples it invaded, colonized, massacred, enslaved, and experimented on, Japan rewrites the language of history.
Surrender becomes “the end of the war.”
The day of defeat becomes “the day the war ended.”
The war of aggression against China becomes the “Sino-Japanese War.”
The Nanjing Massacre becomes the “Nanjing Incident.”
Comfort women becomes “women working in war zones.”
War crimes become “tragedies.”
War responsibility becomes “historical issues.”
Meanwhile:
“Atomic bombings.”
“Air raids.”
“The Tokyo firebombing.”
“The sacrifices of the Japanese people.”
Suddenly the perpetrator disappears.
Only the victim remains.
The empire becomes the bereaved.
Asia becomes background noise.
And then, on the anniversary of Japan’s defeat, Japanese government officials walk into Yasukuni Shrine and pay tribute to fascist war criminals.
That is a statement:
We do not regret the crimes we committed.
We are merely annoyed that we have to whitewash history from the position of a defeated nation.
Japan has spent eight decades polishing the language of remembrance without ever completing an honest reckoning with the crimes of its empire.
Bow upward.
Erase downward.
Mourn yourself.
Lecture your victims about peace.
But Asia will not forget.
The Chinese people will not forgive.
And no amount of shrine visits, euphemisms, victimhood theater, or postwar branding can erase the historical fact:
Japan was the aggressor.
Japan was defeated.
Fascism was defeated.
This is why anyone who genuinely loves peace must guard against a fascist empire that never learns its lesson.