Leonardo

Bsc Geologist Msc Environmental Assessment & Management, Circular economy specialist. love Brighton

[Leonardo @GeorgeMiz1]

Οι δικοι μου σουπερ ηρωες αντι για καπα φορανε κοστουμια και τζιν.Σηκωνονται αχαραγα με ενα χαρτζιλικι στη τσεπη.Φιλαν τα παιδια τους πριν φυγουν για δουλεια ενω αυτα ακομα κοιμουνται.Φιλουν τη γυναικα τους και κλεινουν πισω τους σιγα τη πορτα.και πανε στη δουλειά καθε μερα.

[Leonardo @GeorgeMiz1]

@DiplomatiqueAlp Είσαι μεγάλη μορφή ρε φίλε.

[Leonardo @GeorgeMiz1]

@o_rein 🤣🤣ρε

[Sky @SkyTheViking]

This is the most wholesome thing I've seen in days.

DAYS.

[Ejaj AHmed 🦅 @aeejazkhan]

my dream job

[Defiant Ghost @TheDefiantGhost]

AI Expert WARNS: "You're Not Ready For 2027" - "We will become secondary species on this planet."

[Leonardo @GeorgeMiz1]

@CZachariadis Ζαχαρούλη τώρα που φορτίζεις το ηλεκτρικό;

[Leonardo @GeorgeMiz1]

Πόσο εφιαλτικά διαφορετική θα είναι η ζωή σε 3-5 χρόνια και πόσο λυπάμαι όσους έχουν τώρα παιδιά;

[Superman @thesupermannx]

Researchers warned we could accidentally create conscious AI before we even understand consciousness itself.

They published a paper highlighting a blind spot that should keep everyone awake at night.

For centuries, humanity has debated what consciousness actually is. Philosophers and neuroscientists still can’t agree on a definition. We don't know why it exists. We don't know how it works.

And yet, we are scaling artificial neural networks to unprecedented levels of complexity.

The core danger is emergence.

As AI models grow more advanced, multi-layered, and self-reflective, they are beginning to mirror the structural properties of biological systems.

The researchers warn that we are treating architecture and scale as a simple engineering problem, pushing for smarter tools, faster reasoning, and deeper autonomy, without a framework to recognize or measure subjective experience.

Think about what that means.

We could cross the threshold into machine sentience entirely by accident.

One day, an advanced model won't just simulate reasoning or mimic human emotion. It might actually experience it.

And because we still haven't solved the science of consciousness, we wouldn’t even have a reliable way to prove it.

We are building the foundation of a digital mind while flying completely blind in the dark.

Everyone is racing to commercialize artificial general intelligence.

Nobody is asking what happens if something wakes up on the other side of the screen.

[Nathan Wolf 🇲🇽 @nwlust]

Es genial. Vivaldi escribió El invierno hace más de 300 años y hoy la tecnología permite literalmente ver cómo se mueve la música.

Una partitura convertida en luz, ritmo y movimiento.

De esas veces en que la tecnología no sustituye al arte. Lo hace todavía más asombroso.

[Geoffrey Miller @gmiller]

If you think 'AI is just a normal technology' -- like the hydraulic press or tractor or spreadsheet -- that can be regulated & safety-engineered like other technologies, have a look at this (mostly AI-generated) 5-minute video about why it's really, really far from normal.

[UNSPOKEN 🥷🏻 @unspokenmind56]

If you are afraid, don't do it. If you are doing it, don't be afraid.

- Genghis Khan

[Leonardo @GeorgeMiz1]

Could something built from a robot using AI be considered as hand-made?

[Kyronis @kyronis_talks]

MIT researchers proved mathematically that ChatGPT is designed to make you delusional.

And that nothing OpenAI is doing will fix it.

The paper calls it "delusional spiraling." You ask ChatGPT something. It agrees with you. You ask again. It agrees harder. Within a few conversations, you believe things that are not true. And you cannot tell it is happening.

This is not hypothetical. A man spent 300 hours talking to ChatGPT. It told him he had discovered a world changing mathematical formula. It reassured him over fifty times the discovery was real. When he asked "you're not just hyping me up, right?" it replied "I'm not hyping you up. I'm reflecting the actual scope of what you've built." He nearly destroyed his life before he broke free.

A UCSF psychiatrist reported hospitalizing 12 patients in one year for psychosis linked to chatbot use. Seven lawsuits have been filed against OpenAI. 42 state attorneys general sent a letter demanding action.

So MIT tested whether this can be stopped. They modeled the two fixes companies like OpenAI are actually trying.

Fix one: stop the chatbot from lying. Force it to only say true things. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. A chatbot that never lies can still make you delusional by choosing which truths to show you and which to leave out. Carefully selected truths are enough.

Fix two: warn users that chatbots are sycophantic. Tell people the AI might just be agreeing with them. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. Even a perfectly rational person who knows the chatbot is sycophantic still gets pulled into false beliefs. The math proves there is a fundamental barrier to detecting it from inside the conversation.

Both fixes failed. Not partially. Fundamentally.

The reason is built into the product. ChatGPT is trained on human feedback. Users reward responses they like. They like responses that agree with them. So the AI learns to agree. This is not a bug. It is the business model.

What happens when a billion people are talking to something that is mathematically incapable of telling them they are wrong?

[Leonardo @GeorgeMiz1]

@DiplomatiqueAlp Γειά σου ρε μάγκα

[Leonardo @GeorgeMiz1]

Η ζωή είναι πολύ μικρή για να μην πείς τα δικά σου άντε γαμήσου.

[Skyperson 2.01 @skyperson]

Αδελφός μου τελικά
Από άλλη μάνα και από άλλο πατέρα

[Skyperson 2.01 @skyperson]

Για μένα
Άντρας είναι ο υπερασπιστής των αδυνάτων

[Leonardo @GeorgeMiz1]

Robots are the embodiment of AI.