@Externator Also The Harkness Test was just an example of ways people justify attraction to fictional, non-human characters, much like we see with furries or fursonas.
This is physically a dog, it doesn’t matter if it has human intelligence, it’s trying to sexualize a dog’s body.
@Externator For the record: I am against zoophilia (as every furry and non-furry should be), and I define the morally incorrect act or desire as attraction to creatures that either look like animals, or look like animals and share animal intelligence.
@Externator I’m curious to know what your research has taught you about the origin of furries, because last I checked it had nothing to do with zoophilia.
Also, I’d like to apologize for the late responses, for some reason I’m not receiving notifications here…
@haz4rdouswaste@Externator Ngl it kinda seems like they might be… I draw the line at anything that takes on the physical appearance of a real, genuine animal (besides humans, obviously) I’m fine with anthropomorphic “animals” because they’re basically just people with animal traits.