Gill

sexy⚡.eth

[Gill @GilXooX]

@lanhubiji 真的 深有同感

[Gill @GilXooX]

@PeaceTech_FF @rwayne 这你都知道. 年纪不小.

[Gill @GilXooX]

@badattrading_ Wut about EfPoo4wWgxKVToit7yX5VtXXBrhao4G8L7vrbKy6pump. Boss

[Gill @GilXooX]

@cryptolfggo 半年不到 颈椎好了，腰间盘突出了.

[Gill @GilXooX]

@rickawsb Rick 可以考虑出书了

[Gill @GilXooX]

@BTCBruce1 没有吧 不能按高电价地区来考虑

[Gill @GilXooX]

@Chris_Defi 博士你好

[川沐｜Trumoo🐮 @xiaomustock]

币安还活着对币圈是最大的不幸，千万别觉得币安死了对币圈是一种极大的伤害.
老表们多多转发这一条真相.
它的目的就是搞死币圈创新，
你们去回顾过去五年币圈创新，再看看币安对这些创新干了什么，就能想明白这俩口子是个什么德行了.

[Gill @GilXooX]

@cz_binance 大表哥与深潮打配合.

[Gill @GilXooX]

@0xravenbnb @haze0x 币圈故事会.

[Gill @GilXooX]

@ohyishi 能否说详细点 大佬

[Gill @GilXooX]

@youmin8341 来吧 大佬

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

Ethereum itself must pass the walkaway test.

Ethereum is meant to be a home for trustless and trust-minimized applications, whether in finance, governance or elsewhere. It must support applications that are more like tools - the hammer that once you buy it's yours - than like services that lose all functionality once the vendor loses interest in maintaining them (or worse, gets hacked or becomes value-extractive). Even when applications do have functionality that depends on a vendor, Ethereum can help reduce those dependencies as much as possible, and protect the user as much as possible in those cases where the dependencies fail.

But building such applications is not possible on a base layer which itself depends on ongoing updates from a vendor in order to continue being usable - even if that "vendor" is the all core devs process. Ethereum the blockchain must have the traits that we strive for in Ethereum's applications. Hence, Ethereum itself must pass the walkaway test.

This means that Ethereum must get to a place where we _can ossify if we want to_. We do not have to stop making changes to the protocol, but we must get to a place where Ethereum's value proposition does not strictly depend on any features that are not in the protocol already.

This includes the following:

* Full quantum-resistance. We should resist the trap of saying "let's delay quantum-resistance until the last possible moment in the name of ekeing out more efficiencies for a while longer". Individual users have that right, but the protocol should not. Being able to say "Ethereum's protocol, as it stands today, is cryptographically safe for a hundred years" is something we should strive to get to as soon as possible, and insist on as a point of pride.
* An architecture that can expand to sufficient scalability. The protocol needs to have the properties that allow it to expand to many thousands of TPS over time, most notably ZK-EVM validation and data sampling through PeerDAS. Ideally, we get to a point where further scaling is done through "parameter only" changes - and ideally _those_ changes are not BPO-style forks, but rather are made with the same validator voting mechanism we use for the gas limit.
* A state architecture that can last decades. This means deciding, and implementing, whatever form of partial statelessness and state expiry will let us feel comfortable letting Ethereum run with thousands of TPS for decades, without breaking sync or hard disk or I/O requirements. It also means future-proofing the tree and storage types to work well with this long-term environment.
* An account model that is general-purpose (this is "full account abstraction": move away from enshrined ECDSA for signature validation)
* A gas schedule that we are confident is free of DoS vulnerabilities, both for execution and for ZK-proving
* A PoS economic model that, with all we have learned over the past half decade of proof of stake in Ethereum and full decade beyond, we are confident can last and remain decentralized for decades, and supports the usefulness of ETH as trustless collateral (eg. in governance-minimized ETH-backed stablecoins)
* A block building model that we are confident will resist centralization pressure and guarantee censorship resistance even in unknown future environments

Ideally, we do the hard work over the next few years, to get to a point where in the future almost all future innovation can happen through client optimization, and get reflected in the protocol through parameter changes. Every year, we should tick off at least one of these boxes, and ideally multiple. Do the right thing once, based on knowledge of what is truly the right thing (and not compromise halfway fixes), and maximize Ethereum's technological and social robustness for the long term.

Ethereum goes hard.

This is the gwei.

[老莫 @laomo198]

V神新帖：打造百年以太坊

思想：以太坊得做到没人管也能跑，哪怕所有开发者都跑路了，这条链也得稳稳运行几十年上百年

V神的意思是：以太坊上的应用应该像锤子，买回来就是你的，永远能用

不能像某些互联网服务——公司倒了、被黑了、或者开始割韭菜了，你啥也干不了

但问题来了：如果以太坊底层自己都需要开发者天天维护才能转，那以太坊上面的应用怎么可能真正做到无需信任呢？
所以，以太坊自己得先做到这一点

啥叫 离场测试 :
不是说现在就不改了，而是说得尽快到一个状态：
1.该有的功能都有了，不靠画饼
2.想固化就能固化，固化了也不会出问题
简单说就是：随时可以收工，但收工了也照样牛逼

V神列了7个必须搞定的事：
1.量子抗性 : 不能拖了得早点搞，目标是以太坊密码学能撑一百年

2.扩容架构 : 得能扩到几千TPS（靠ZK-EVM + PeerDAS） 以后扩容最好只调参数就行，别老搞硬分叉

3.状态管理 : 搞定状态过期这些，让链跑几十年硬盘也不会爆

4.账户抽象 : 干掉写死的ECDSA签名，让账户更灵活

5.Gas机制: 确保没有DoS漏洞，不管是普通交易还是ZK证明

6.PoS经济模型: 得能撑几十年不崩，还得让ETH能当靠谱的抵押品

7.抗审查 :区块构建不能被大机构垄断，得一直能抗审查

v神希望：
• 未来几年集中火力把这些硬骨头啃完
• 一次做对，别整半吊子
• 每年至少搞定一个
等这些到位了，以后改进基本靠客户端优化就行

总体是在说：以太坊要从《持续开发中》变成《百年基础设施 》
不是不迭代了，是要到一个不迭代也没事的状态

Ethereum goes hard. This is the gwei.
以太坊要硬核，这就是 gwei

[Gill @GilXooX]

@0xAA_Science SocialFi 就是个伪命题

[Gill @GilXooX]

@Imlaomao 他们真应该回去伊斯兰国家去实施教法. 何苦到异教国家折腾.

[Gill @GilXooX]

@wublockchain12 他现在是不是在新加坡啊

[Gill @GilXooX]

@santaXmeme_ 7YogFbLLQyBjfySpBJabDZHwYtE1JE4pZjJYNeSM6unc

[Gill @GilXooX]

BN已经大到成为毒瘤了

[Benson Sun @BensonTWN]

1011 事件已經告訴我們：幣圈媒體完全沒有監督能力。
不是不願意，而是不能。

因為媒體賴以為生的廣告與贊助，90% 以上來自交易所與項目方。

你要他們去質疑、追問、監督長期給自己投放預算的金主？在商業現實下不可能做到。

而社群媒體呢？

坦白說，也沒有好到哪裡去。

大部分 KOL 不會真的去跟交易所作對。

返佣、合作、推廣、專案、友情、站隊，各種利益關係都讓人難以開口。

這也是為什麼，在伊莉莎白詐捐事件後，KOL 幾乎全數表態，人人都上去踩一腳；

但到了 1011 這種市場系統級別的事故，哪怕自己也受影響，多數人仍選擇保持沉默。

我查了一下數據：伊莉莎白詐捐事件在中文 CT 中的流量峰值，全面壓過 1011。

兩者本來不該在同一個量級上，但現實就是這麼荒謬。

你會看到許多匪夷所思的現象：
Digital Galaxy 這麼大的機構，都得在壓力下修改 1011 事件的標題。

幣安拿到阿布扎比牌照、招銀合作案、何一訪談的公關稿，媒體報得比誰都快、篇幅比誰都大。

但 1011 這種直接關乎市場安全與用戶資產的重大事故，媒體幾乎全部噤聲，訪談避重就輕，該追問的不追問，該解釋的通通略過。

拿我自己的例子來說，前陣子我寫了一篇英文長文，公開問責幣安 1011 事件的處理流程問題。

那篇文在 X 上有超過 30 萬曝光、1000+ 個讚、350+ 個轉發。

如果是以前，媒體問都不會問，早就搶著轉載，因為這是貨真價實的流量題材。

但這次的結果是什麼？
全場只有一家中文媒體轉發。（雖然標題被修得比較溫和，但願意轉發，我已經很感謝了。）

幣安之所以能成為幣安，是因為它曾經做對了很多事。

但1011 事件這種級別的安全事故，只要處理不透明，就足以動搖八年累積的信任基礎。

[Gill @GilXooX]

@lanhubiji 还有韭菜 和赌狗.