๐ฒ๐พ born ๐ฎ๐ณ living in ๐ฆ๐บ. Manchester United and PC Games are my life! Talks logic most times but emotional sometimes (I am only human ๐)
I have no issues with Ineos taking 69% or 61% stake at United. This means they would have NO control and would be puppets that just get dividends paid to them. Why I hate this 25% deal so much is because:
1. Glazers still in control
2. They have a lifeline
3. They may never leave
@TheLAMatthews How about putting some of the accountability on the player? He is one of the best players on the team. You should have a minimum expectation based on that salary he is on. He hasn't done anything in a long time to earn the salary he is on?
@TheElitePundit Exactly. If he really wants ยฃ200kpw, then find a club that will meet at least ยฃ70M and can offer him those wages. This news is BS ๐
@talkSPORT Someone on astronomical wages like Rashford is on should be able to pull his finger out and run at least. How much is Rashford paying you to be his mouthpiece?
@UtdDistrict@ChrisWheelerDM@ManUtd Didn't this bum say he wanted a new challenge ge a couple of weeks ago? What's changed? Probably realised that no big club rates him that highly? Humbled! ๐
The Glazers are the banks who approved the subprime mortgages that caused the GFC. INEOS is the government who had to come in and bail out these banks for their malpractices by imposing severe measures. Don't blame the government, blame the banks.