Sneako is a good example of a common phenomenon: the racial alien who grows up enjoying a great standard of living in the West, has no reason to feel anything for Whites but gratitude and should be an ideal case of "integration," yet still ends up making resentment of their hosts the core of their worldview.
Sneako grew up to a middle-class family in Connecticut and attended a private school paid for by his immigrant parents, yet he larps as a black New Yorker. He adopted Malcolm X and Andrew Tate as his idols because they were more self-assured mulatto men who seemed to assert an identity outside White cultural norms, and even converted to Islam to imitate them. He has since made his entire justification for his religion that it is the most universal and anti-racist creed, because he is absolutely obsessed with "White supremacy."
He gradually went from red pill slop content to brown clown leftism because the one constant incentive he couldn't resist was the racial justice angle, which like most Muslim immigrants in the West trumps any of the other social values his religion might prescribe.
But like many brown clowns who adopt the language of leftism to articulate their hatred, the mask always eventually comes off and it becomes clear the driving force is his resentment of White civilization and cope for his feelings of inferiority and deracination.
Interestingly if you look at the profile of Islamic terrorists in the West, many are second-generation immigrants who came from middle-class families and lived pretty liberal, degenerate lifestyles before a sudden dramatic conversion – and they are typically driven by the same resentment.
“A visão de mundo de Nolan não é grande o bastante para caber deuses de verdade nem pessoas de verdade que pudessem ser diferentes de nós.”
gente ela esmagou KKKKKKK
I hated The Odyssey with the passion of a thousand suns: it is the most aggressively revisionist adaptation I'm fairly sure I've ever seen, and thoroughly and separately trashes each and every main character, making them either weak or unlikable or both. And despite what reviewers claimed, every tiny thread in it hummed to the tune of progressive ideologies that were deeply woven into every piece of how it framed reality and the world: gods aren't real, or are indiffernet or cruel or can't be known, there's no transcendence or mystery, there are no heroes or heroines or glory or true bravery, and grim, terrible, bleak things happen in a nihilistic world, and the eeevil Greeks are to be horrifically blamed for sacking Troy and not living in a kumbaya world where all peoples just get along in peace and harmony (I can't believe I"m even writing that but it was the main theme of the entire third act and there's a specific line about how sacking troy and winning the war broke Zeus' law and therefore irrevocably "broke the bonds between people" thus plunging the world into chaos and disunity). Unity and harmony between people groups is portrayed as the highest ultimate good. The idea of individuals being heroic is spat upon over and over and over: there are no heroes in Nolan's adaptation. Penelope in particular is turned in the second half of hte film into a whiny, crying, explicitly feminist figure who tears up constantly and also wants the throne for herself. Also, the majority of the film is boring: two separate people in the rows around us fell completely asleep (we went to an 8:30pm showing) and only woke up when the movie was over
🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: The New York Times has ranked the 10 best players at the 2026 World Cup.
1. Lionel Messi 🇦🇷
2. Kylian Mbappé 🇫🇷
3. Rodri 🇪🇸
4. Jude Bellingham 🏴
5. Pau Cubarsí 🇪🇸
6. Aymeric Laporte 🇪🇸
7. Erling Haaland 🇳🇴
8. Harry Kane 🏴
9. Michael Olise 🇫🇷
10. Ousmane Dembélé 🇫🇷
Watched Nolan’s leaked Odyssey film and it’s so much worse than you can imagine. I expected it to at least be a well made film, but instead is very difficult to get through. This isn’t even a fun ride like Batman or Inception.
1. The dialogue is absolutely terrible and breaks immersion. American street slang and colloquialisms are shocking to hear in a film set in antiquity. I feel like I’m watching an SNL skit.
2. Scene cuts are absolutely terrible and unexpected. It seems like burning through the expensive 70mm film intimidated all the actors and even the director.
3. Scenes just seem so imperfect. Dialogue rushed, 3rd wall unintentionally broken by stupid lines every other scene.
4. Random black or ethnic faces are jarring and break immersion.
5. Anne Hathaway, whose milkers were enjoyed by all on the red carpet, acts terribly in the film, like some teenager acting for the first time.
6. They have Penelope say stupid dishonorable lines like that she, Odysseus, and Telemachus should flee their kingdom and Agamemnon so Odysseus doesn’t have to go to war.
7. No large historical battles on Troy showcasing heroes and siege. No shining armor or spears under the Mediterranean sun, arrow volleys, etc.
8. No feast or revelry after Troy is captured. Somehow they leave angry instead of victorious and with full bellies. They feel too guilty to take provisions from Troy but they’re ok raiding additional villages on the way home… what?
9. Everything is so dark. The beauty of the Aegean is sometimes showcased, but it never lasts long enough, and so much happens during the night or by fire light that 70mm film seems wasted or limiting.
10. All the gods, nymphs etc look like vagrants wearing clothes form H&M rather than ethereal beings. ZERO AURA
Nobody will remember this film even if it makes money. I’m in disbelief of how terrible it is.
this performative argentinian hate is literally getting ridiculous like why is samuel jackson calling argentina the most racist country itw💀 it really gets to a point where it feels like the global north doesn’t care about systemic racism, its just an excuse to be nasty to the global south without consequences
¿De qué hablaba exactamente el mundo cuando nombraba en redes sociales a 🇦🇷 durante el Mundial? Un análisis con NLP sobre 40.000 posteos publicados durante el torneo lo midió y la respuesta fue categórica: de fútbol, casi no se hablaba.
Los 29 tópicos detectados se agrupan en 5 grandes narrativas, y solo una es futbolera: la del “mundial arreglado” y el VAR. Las otras cuatro no tocan una pelota: racismo como atributo de la nacionalidad, Malvinas usada para humillar (con especial intensidad en la conversación en inglés), Argentina como refugio nazi, y la etiqueta de “Israel de América Latina”, que aparece aislada en el mapa semántico porque no nace del fútbol sino del alineamiento político con Israel. Hay además un hallazgo extra: “Hambrientina”, una conversación más chica pero tan consistente que emergió como tópico propio, burla organizada sobre la crisis económica. Ninguna de estas narrativas es nueva, ya existían como repertorio de años anteriores y este mundial funcionó de amplificador.m de las mismas.
El estudio es de la politóloga y data scientist María de los Ángeles Lasa (@condolasa) y su conclusión es precisa: una conversación hostil, persistente y organizada, con la pelota como excusa. La campañas de odio espontáneas son difusas, estallan y se apagan… esta tenía ejes definidos, términos propios y consistencia en el tiempo. Eso es propaganda funcionando a escala y, lamentablemente, seguirá creciendo pues los algoritmos la aman.