@comandingo Great point! The very idea of an omission requires an understanding of what it means to have different interests or assumptions about relevance, i.e. a perspective. The contrary concept would be that of completeness (God) which doesn't make sense across different perspectives.
If you do not see this man, and his peers, as cult leaders, you are a fool. They are playing all angles simultaneously—doomsday cult, healing miracles cult, secret knowledge cult, messianic cult—and it’s been effective.
@ArianeKonzepte Gern! Stammt aus einem Gedicht von Lucebert, aus dem das Zitat dann von Toni Burgering als Kunstwerk (wie hier fotografiert) in Rotterdam installiert wurde: https://t.co/8eDxmPD3D5
@comandingo@QuirinPoulsen It doesn't matter, if it's a one-off. It will matter, if it becomes a trend or pattern to cook AI recipies. Repetition legitimizes.
Usually, we tend to think of the alignment problem as the problem of getting AI to align with human intentions, values, and so on. But the real alignment problem is that humans tend to align with AI.
@comandingo I see. But where does that leave the aspect of purpose? The organisation of human knowlegde is linked to purposes. If these affect knowledge production, wouldn't that require ascribing similar purposes to machines?
@christianbangel So differenziert wie Sie äußern sich sonst nur sehr kompetente Kritiker der Ideologiekritik. Wirklich beeindrucked. Allerdings glaube ich, dass Sie "Palestinismus" meinen.