@BrandonASWard@bog_beef This is simply not true. Every culture didn't develop systems that are based on giving land feuds to vassals for service and loyalty. It's not even applicable to entire medieval Europe, only West Europe
@turbojedi Все просто. Людям не нравится игросодержащий продукт не менявшийся с 2018, который будет продаваться за 70$, но вместо того чтобы критиковать очевидные минусы, они выискивают какую-то хуйню, чтобы положить на алтарь культурной войны или докапываются до херни по типу мокапа куба
@Yumyellen110439@tylkoCzytam0 As for Israel, there's a history of Israel dealing with people incapable of peaceful negotiations who constantly threaten their people, and deny everything but total destruction of a Jewish state. They have every right to do what they're doing
@Yumyellen110439@tylkoCzytam0 Social constructs change all the time, but they change along with SOCIETY. But you can't just decide you are of a different gender, just like you can't decide what race you are. Social contra construct implies that it's the society and social conditions that decides your gender
@Yumyellen110439@tylkoCzytam0 You cannot be a marxist and believe in welfare and worker unions as salvations for a working class. It's not some niche marxist opinion that only a fraction of them believes , it's part of their own doctrine
@Yumyellen110439@tylkoCzytam0 Humans have in-built mechanisms of recognizing who's their own and who's alien to them, that always lead to discrimination of minorities and what sabotages non homogenized societies. Also saying white people aren't over represented in racism, that is just a lie
@Zyzy1585552@eurocompel@Robipony Are humans who asleep consciousness? People in coma? People who do not meet the requirement levels of intellect to be represented in court? It depends on a definition of sentience that can easily be twisted to support a certain ideological stance
@Zyzy1585552@eurocompel@Robipony Yes. i know, that's the problem. You can't certainly define what sentient means, while not dehumanizing those groups pro-choicers actually care about. It's an eternal struggle that only few of them understand
@yupyuppmmmm@Vameru_GG@eurocompel@Robipony I don't care how many artistic adjectives you put into describing a newborn baby the minute before it comes out. This hypothetical doesn't even prove anything, it's just "would you save more or less people" Can you do any other argumentation beside using emotions?
@Zyzy1585552@eurocompel@Robipony Pro-abortionists in majority don't make those arguments towards anybody else though, and stand against this argumentation in every other discourse. That's the problem, it's illogical
@yupyuppmmmm@Vameru_GG@eurocompel@Robipony if i had to choose and those embryos were ensured to grow into adults, i'd pick the 10 embryos. This is still not an argument to kill your children because you feel like it, just FYI
@yupyuppmmmm@Vameru_GG@eurocompel@Robipony Abortion procedure always results in a child's death, even before it comes out of mother's womb. There are no "safe for embryos" abortions. And again, no one in third reich's death camps would call gypsies and slavs people as well
@yupyuppmmmm@Vameru_GG@eurocompel@Robipony since you mentioned me as well, 10 embryos outside of mother's womb in a fire probably won't survive either way so I'll pick a newborn baby. Trying to come up with shitty hypotheticals to justify mothers killing their children is so fucking pathetic
@yupyuppmmmm@Vameru_GG@eurocompel@Robipony You couldn't prove it. Firstly because all fetuses and embryos are dead after abortion procedure, secondly because if laws allow you to kill humans it doesn't prove it's morally okay to do so(again, example of genocides and slavery)
@Yumyellen110439@tylkoCzytam0 It's in human nature to recognize people different from yourself and be defendant towards your own. It doesn't lose analytical value, it just describes human behavior, just as hunger, present in human species. With exceptions, of course, as there always are some