I deleted my account in 2023 with a few thousand followers and a record of my thoughts going back to 2010.
I'm back, with a clean slate. Mostly here to quietly observe.
@GarrisonLovely I find people respond so much better to the tangible economic risks ("rich people will get richer while you lose your job!") than x-risks that sound both paralyzingly huge and remind them of a local cult leader declaring the next doomsday.
It's been interesting getting reactions to these projections at The Curve & EAG NYC - AI Safety folks think our AI Safety number is way too low, global health folks think the windfall is way below what they need, philanthropy folks think we're pretty spot on
What do YOU think??
Last month GPT-6 Astra (@chatgpt) beat Montezuma's Revenge, and a lot of people declared that our "weakly general AI" question, originally launched in 2020, resolved.
But…it still hasn’t resolved.
We wanted to give everyone a quick update on where things actually stand and the steps we’re currently taking (cc @swishfever@joeykrug@emollick). 🧵
@philiptorr Yep. I personally think public messaging should lead with economic impacts. People are already feeling so squeezed that this feels more salient, tangible, and feasible than crazy-sounding existential risk.
@DavidSKrueger This workshop was my first event in the AI Safety world, after a career pivot. You/this talk were instrumental in shaping my thinking on the subject, and I appreciate the accessible and tangible ways you talk about existential risk and pathways to stop AI.
@GarrisonLovely I thought your question during yesterday's big name Q&A was excellent - thanks for asking it. But such a disappointingly unsatisfying answer.
The Anthropic & OpenAI IPOs could mint thousands of new millionaires, & a lot of them plan to give. But how much will actually reach the philanthropic ecosystem? Some predictions:
@nanransohoff: $37B+/year
@georgecaweiner: $12-32B to DAFs
@cogcelia: $37.9B from 7 Anthropic co-founders
Our forecasters expect $100B+ in pledges, but only ~$26B of it to reach charities by 2031. We used our new visual mapping tool, Radiant, to land at those numbers. Read more here:
@copykat510 Per the usual, he's the only politician paying any attention 🫠
Hopefully his awareness and efforts will get more of them on board with AI safety policies ASAP
@HumanHarlan And in January 2020, all the epidemiologists were freaking out, while no one else paid them any attention. Feels way too familiar to the vibes in the AI safety space currently.
1/ Which jobs are most vulnerable to AI automation?
The Labor Automation Forecasting Hub now has individual pages for 15 US occupations, including:
- Community forecasts at 2027, 2030, and 2035
- Pro Forecaster commentary
- 3 distinct AI exposure metrics (Felten, M&A vulnerability, Anthropic). More details about each in the replies.
Curious which jobs forecasters think will grow or contract, and the reasoning behind the forecasts? Read on 🧵