@PhysicsHawk Reading is the winner here, as everything in reading is connected. My favorite comparison is fantasy (Lord of the Rings, Narnia, etc.) and the Bible. Both contain the ideas of good defeating evil, and doing what is right. They enhance one another, and can build off each other.
@CadeTischer@PhysicsHawk I agree, the many differences in our brains exist on a whole range, meaning we are different from the understanding of the big concepts of life, all the way down to the useless and small habits.
@PhysicsHawk First off, it reveals every person is different and better or worse at various tasks, thus different levels of attention vary. Secondly, with the understanding of Creation, God MADE all of us with different intended gifts to best serve His overall plan for us.
@PhysicsHawk Feynman's method was more precise, as he attempted the experiment multiple times, added real world variables to said tests, and concluded that each person may end up doing the test differently. Feynman actually took the time to understand the broader process of the test.
@PhysicsHawk This "science" experiment does not make any sense. The difficulty of counting at an even rate. The overwhelming odds of clear variation with each attempt. The absurd variables such as the addition of heart rate. And finally, that many people can do the same task differently.
@kbjunior11@PhysicsHawk It is healthy to have people with different beliefs around you, so that you are not locked it to one type of reasoning or understanding. This can broaden your knowledge of almost any topic.
@PhysicsHawk These conversations usually can happen quite frequently, as me and my friends used to debate every week about some new topic, whether something as useless as video games, to the more grounded issues of spirituality and the Bible. #feynmanchat1920
@TischerCade@PhysicsHawk It is almost unreal on what is visible through a microscope. The fact that there can be a living, moving cell (or part of one), that we can see at such a small scale is truly insane.
@GrieciNathaniel@PhysicsHawk I agree, there are many math and science principles we as humans have yet to recognize and understand, but that does not mean they are not there.
@PhysicsHawk Personally, I remember the vocabulary books throughout middle school. Those were purely memorization of definitions, but I never remember using those words in writing, and vaguely in various books we had to read. We only got taught complex writing understanding in high school.
@PhysicsHawk Mystery as a whole breeds curiosity, and as a result innovation. Mystery gets man wondering of the possibilities, the potential of his work. That potential will then create innovation and structure, and hopefully, at some point, truth and factual evidence.
@PhysicsHawk The story of knitting socks revealed the presence of math and science in everything around us. It's science how I can smell food cooking in the kitchen, and a supply chain used math to organize and distribute food evenly to various stores. Math and science are truly everywhere.
@PhysicsHawk The process of recognizing patterns builds connections in your brain to eventually develop deep and logical thought. Everything builds upon one another in the learning process, and you need to start with the simpler concepts before moving on to advanced scientific thinking.
@KaelibraswellP@PhysicsHawk I agree, last minute decisions usually never work, and only result in hurting people or one's image to the public. Preparing early could be a counter to this temptation to do something last minute.
@PhysicsHawk Any new project will have some safety concerns. The nuclear bomb was a risk to even be in the same room with. Going into space at all is a risk entirely, and even jets, cars, missiles. No innovation happens without risk, but safety should be priority before the creation process.
@TischerCade@PhysicsHawk So many variables can easily result in someone overlooking the smaller, more forgettable ones. This can reduce performance or cause potential health concerns.