If someone made this exact same statement -- but replaced "Muslim" with "Jew" -- their career would not only be instantly and permanently destroyed, but their families, banks, communities and employers would be relentlessly hounded until they were denounced, disowned and banned.
BreakThrough issued its official response to the House Ways and Means Committee today, detailing how the Committee’s own statements reveal the illegitimate and unconstitutional nature of their witch-hunt. We are overwhelmed by the outpouring of support we have received from the community to respond to this challenge head-on.
BT’s response makes clear: “Congress may not train its power on a speaker because of the viewpoint that speaker expresses. … [It] has no legitimate interest in the viewpoint of a domestic news organization, and it may not use compulsory process to reach it. The First Amendment does not tolerate inquiry into American opinion.”
“BreakThrough News cannot be required to respond to a process that, as presently framed and as publicly described, seeks to punish, silence, expose, and condemn protected expression, including disfavored reporting, and it will not yield its First Amendment rights and privileges.”
The full 17-page reply prepared with our legal counsel can be read at https://t.co/vbYSC8wOB3. BT is represented by the Law Office of Andrew D. Herman and Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (@thepcjf).
We are determined to not surrender our First Amendment rights. Check the link in bio to sign the petition or make a donation in support of BreakThrough’s ongoing work.
Read the full response:
https://t.co/KWR1pokvJ6
Part of what makes Tucker so compelling is that he’s genuinely skilled at seeing through other people. But exposing someone else’s dishonesty is not the same as being willing to confront your own, and there can be no real growth until that confrontation happens.
By shifting responsibility for his choices onto someone else, he gets to perform the part of a changed man without fully reckoning with the man he was. He’s hoping the performance will be enough to persuade you that transformation has already begun. That’s why discernment matters most when someone’s charisma, talent, and message are telling you exactly what you want to believe.
Those are the moments when it’s easiest to mistake someone’s ability to see through others for a willingness to see themselves clearly.
ANTI-ZIONISM PROTECTED BY UK LAW
We have set a binding legal precedent!
Anti-Zionism is now a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010. Full stop.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal finally handed down its judgment this morning. The University of Bristol’s attempt to overturn my 2024 Employment Tribunal victory has been comprehensively dismissed. We won on every single count.
This is a public humiliation for the genocidal Zionist regime, whose assets in Britain bullied the University into sacking me and then dragged them into this futile appeal. Their legal strategy has collapsed. Their pressure campaign has spectacularly backfired.
Thanks to everyone who believed in me and supported me. This is a victory for the whole anti-Zionist movement.
A full statement will follow shortly.
From the River to the Sea
Palestine will be free! 🇵🇸
#DismantleZionism
This is not a serious country?! This is MADNESS 😱
@AnnekaSvenska was visited by the police, citing the Online Safety Act, for posting about animal suffering - and they told her to to do an “online thinking skills course” 🤡
We need a legal overhaul….
RFK Jr. explains why Fauci had such a problem with early treatments like ivermectin:
"Tony Fauci's problem is this: there's a little-known Federal law that says, 'You cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.'”
“So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been ILLEGAL for them to give the emergency use authorization to the vaccines, and they could have NEVER gotten them approved. And a 200 billion dollar enterprise would have collapsed."
Add another reason to resist the impact of AI. Just disgusting and their attitude shows through. They do NOT care about humanity. It is about money and profit.