@RonFilipkowski The six people are Akash Bobba, Edward Coristine, Luke Farritor, Gautier Cole Killian, Gavin Kliger and Ethan Shaotran. Posting names is not doxxing, it’s perfectly legal, and surely it will be supported by the owner of this site, a self-proclaimed free speech absolutist.
@GDuker52004@maxfawcett So weird that somebody who has been paying taxes for decades has paid more than people who have been paying taxes for a small fraction of that time.
@Nonnas_Lasagna @bailiwickostats @CP24 If you would like to try again with specific amounts and countries, and details of why that is not a good use of funds, then we can engage on that. But if all you have is wild hyperbole, then this is not a discussion.
@Nonnas_Lasagna @bailiwickostats @CP24 He has demonstrably not sent “all of our money to every other country except Canada”. There are loads of countries we have not sent any money to, and the money we have sent to other countries is a tiny percentage of the budget. So this is a vague falsehood, not a specific truth.
@NickFoscarini No lint-type tool that could have helped catch that faster? Or just didn’t think of using it? (I don’t know if I would in a similar scenario.)
@bailiwickostats @CP24 Can you us tell which things Trudeau has done which unnecessarily cost the country hundreds of millions of dollars to actually make things worse, while simultaneously crying poor about critical budget items like infrastructure, health care, education and housing?
@Paul_D_Heaslip @1loriking@DonCochraneYOW Sebastian Skamski is a placeholder name an author uses for a malevolent character and then forgets to come up with an actual name for them in the final draft.
@ToniEBowen@maxfawcett People who hate Justin Trudeau really don’t seem to get that loads of people who have voted liberal for years really do still quite like him and think he’s doing a good job. Not a great job in every way, but far more to our liking than what any other party is putting forward.
@Navigator504@AnimalsRockOn@RepJasonCrow I’m directly commenting on your use of AI to bolster your point, as that is an area I have some expertise in. Summary: don’t do that, accuracy levels are extremely low. It might be right, but only by accident, not by design.
@DanielBuchfink@dr_andrealove Are you familiar with the ongoing fentanyl crisis, where people are absolutely putting deadly chemicals into things they then sell as being not deadly? And this is happening despite regulations. Imagine if the regulations didn’t exist.
@Navigator504@AnimalsRockOn@RepJasonCrow You know that AI summaries are based on what it finds on the Internet, and are therefore susceptible to the same disinformation that is driving your own narrative? Presenting one as proof of anything is only proving your own gullibility.
@AaronMikita@Timcast If you can’t see it, it’s either because you’re too dumb to understand, in which case I’m not wasting my time explaining it to you, or it’s because you’re willfully not understanding. Maybe you’re being paid to publicly not understand? That would also be disinformation.