In Christianity there’s a doctrine that if someone leaves the faith and publicly speaks out against it we are supposed to KILL them.
No… wait…. *checks notes
That’s Islam. My bad.
@Soteriology101 Ezek 18 doesn’t get you ‘sin-stained but not guilty.’ It gets you not guilty for another man’s sin. That’s the whole point of the chapter. How is this a defeater? The ‘sin-stained Inclined from Adam’ is an extra claim Ezek 18 does not make.
Before Christianity, much of the world practiced child sacrifice
Now, many atheists will argue that child murder is obviously wrong, even without Christianity
However, as the western world has strayed from Christ, it's clear that child sacrifice is once again being normalized
@Soteriology101 Just reflecting on this. If they are "sin stained" then isn't that saying that they suffered from Adams sin? Doesn't that meant they're guilty? Surely the Tabula Rasa view makes more sense for infants to be innocent. Otherwise how is a stillborn innocent?
@Soteriology101 At 35:34 He’s saying that Provisionists soteriology and EO is similar enough that Provisionists could become EO any day, because ‘smells, bells and incense’ is essentially what separates them from Doesitheus and his confession of 1672.
@MethodMinistry@PracticalCL The irony is Warren's views and criticisms of the past means that Warren has indirectly critiqued Flowers views in the past.
@Soteriology101 If regeneration causes faith, how would a person (or God, evidentially) distinguish 'genuine' faith from an effect indistinguishable from no faith at all? What's the epistemic marker that regeneration happened prior to belief, rather than faith and new life being simultaneous?