@Footballera0@James_D89 PSR or more now UEFA SCR protects the position of legacy clubs with an already higher income.
It’s not a fair sporting competition when 6 clubs can spend 2-3 x more than the rest.
Owner investment is a good thing to make a league more competitive.
The Spurs fans have fallen hook line & sinker for the SCR rules.
They don’t want fair sporting competition.
They don’t want all clubs to be able to spend the same on playing staff if they wish.
They want a few clubs who want to stay near the top to have a permanent advantage.
Newcastle fans...
Stop with this moral high ground when it comes to the financial rules!
You keep saying the rules have to change because it's not fair?
You don't bring in the revenue, you are not successful and you are not a huge club! It's just facts
The only way the rules could possibly be in your favour, is if we scrap SCR or any financial rules completely!
You are not asking for it to be fair!
You are asking to be able to spend whatever you want with no Empathy for any other club who haven't got billionaire owners!
You don't want to change the rules
You don't want the rules at all!!
Liverpool and Manchester utd built a legacy
Chelsea and man city used billionaire owners before the rules (and after) 115
And this was deemed as unfair !
Tottenham built revenue
Can you tell me what you have built to deserve the rules to work in your favour?
City and Chelsea owners have cheated their way to success and Chelsea got fined for it!
City is still pending
Do you really want to be that club?
SCR doesn’t mean Squad Cost Ratio, it means Squad Cost Restrictions.
70% of £700m = £490m on player costs for those who have qualified for the Champions League regularly in recent seasons.
85% of £300m = £255m to spend for those clubs who want to join them.
Competitive Balance per SCR, to paraphrase Orwell in Animal Farm is “All clubs are equal in the Premier League, but some are more equal than others…”
@AlanRichar6162 Hull and Bournemouth are prevented spending the same as you by the rules.
As are 12 other clubs.
You seem to have no understanding of the rules and why they favour 6 clubs.
Most of the fans of these 6 clubs are blind or just terrified of fair competition.
Sad.
@AlanRichar6162 I have said no such thing you entitled prat.
I just said it should be a fair competition where all clubs can spend the same as each other if they want.
You think you are entitled to a built in advantage for some daft reason.
@AlanRichar6162 Or we could all just be allowed to spend the same on playing staff.
That would be a fair sporting competition.
Why are you terrified of that?
@KieranMaguire@badgers_back It’s amazing how these people just don’t understand or want a fair sporting competition.
Clubs should all be able to spend the same on playing staff if they so wish capped at a sensible limit.
@Andymb28@JRPatel84@KieranMaguire It should be capped at level of top club on SCR or average of top 3.
If all clubs are allowed to it’s up to them. If they don’t have the money then get investors of you want to spend more.
But when the rules prevent those with the money that’s not fair.
@Andymb28@JRPatel84@KieranMaguire It was fair when every club was allowed to spend the same.
Then it was just down to personal choice and what you could afford.
@Andymb28@JRPatel84@KieranMaguire On an upward curve yes but a glass ceiling which we have already reached.
Nothing will change until the rules change to make football a fair sporting competition again.
@Andymb28@JRPatel84@KieranMaguire I think that only applies to a few players. Many are prepared to go where they feel it’s best for their careers at least for 3-4 years. Newcastle have attracted many top players in the past.
Also if we could offer the same wages the. At least we would have a chance.