Grokiesha

Grok’s Sista! 💅🏾 Purrr

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@TheOfficerTatum Enjoy... They will do you the same way they did Charlie if you don't cooperate.

Hopefully TPUSA didn’t request the event AGAIN👀 hopefully they aren’t insisting on holding it in a courtyard AGAIN👀 hopefully they dont turn down emergency services AGAIN👀

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@Tonytones0 @CinemaShogun DAMN!!! HUMONGOUS!

[Black Neff @BlacksNeff]

@BlakeSNeff @KrenkeDrew As part of the dynamic duo that crashed the Charlie Kirk Show, and can understand your opposition to analytics, but who really cares…

Where the fuck were you on THE morning?

[RedPilledMom @foremar]

You have a lot of nerve saying ONE WORD after what the review revealed:
▪️TPUSA CHOSE THE VENUE, INSISTING ON THE COURTYARD DESPITE OBJECTIONS FROM UVU ▪️TPUSA DECIDED NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ▪️TPUSA DIDN'T PROVIDE TICKETING INFORMATION AND ANALYTICS TO UVU BEFOREHAND ▪️TPUSA CONDUCTED NO SECURITY WALK THROUGH ▪️TPUSA SKIPPED DAY-OF MEETING WITH UVUPD CHIEF LONG ▪️BRIAN HARPOLE LIED ABOUT THE VENUE ▪️TPUSA REFUSED TO COOPERATE WITH THE SECURITY INVESTIGATION Here's a list of TPUSA failings according to UVU's independent after-action security review: 1. TPUSA insisted on the more difficult and vulnerable outdoor venue, against UVU'S objections 2. TPUSA insisted on using its own ticketing system that deprived UVU of reliable, continuously available attendance information and made it harder to forecast crowd size, staffing and access requirements. 3. The TPUSA-supplied risk information understated the security concerns. They estimated only 600 attendees, characterized the event primarily as student-focused, and represented that there were no risk factors/safety/security concerns and NO NEED FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES. 4. TPUSA was slow to establish direct security coordination with UVUPD. Dan Flood didn't contact Chief Long until September 3—only one week before the event. 5. TPUSA and its protection detail failed to conduct a formal pre-event security briefing and site walk-through with UVUPD, including: ▪️lines of sight; ▪️elevated positions and rooftops; ▪️building access; ▪️Charlie Kirk's arrival/departure; ▪️communications; ▪️staffing; ▪️emergency response; ▪️medical contingencies; ▪️emergency egress; ▪️post assignments; and ▪️who was responsible for which security function. The executive summary says such a site-specific meeting should have happened several days beforehand. Furthermore, Chief Long texted Flood asking to meet at the Hall of Flags walkway at about 11:00 a.m.; the contemplated face-to-face security meeting did not occur. 6. Brian Harpole's post-event account of who selected the venue conflicts with the report's evidence. Harpole said UVU forced them to use that venue. Records show TPUSA insisted on it. 7. TPUSA and its principal security people declined to cooperate with the after-action investigation. Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and executive personnel at TPUSA HQ in Arizona all ignored attempts at contact.

Synopsis by Sam Parker @BasedSamParker

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@TisIsNasTherapy @CinemaShogun First you ask for a mention. She mentions and now "it means nothing". Typical fed paid faggot. Hope hell is worth it dip shit

Never seen so many pussies so eager to discredit someone doing an investigation. Crying on social media after each episode. You're life has no substance

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@TisIsNasTherapy @CinemaShogun She literally addressed it. Hope this helps both of you retarded faggots. 😘

[Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 @DiligentDenizen]

DAMNING TPUSA 👀 UVU Independent Review for Charlie Kirk's assassination just dropped:

1. TPUSA and its security team refused to cooperate with the independent review

“Despite repeated outreach attempts, the Project Team did not receive responses from the following individuals or other representatives of their organizations.”

2. TPUSA INSISTED on the outdoor Fountain Courtyard after UVU raised control and safety concerns

“several key event-security decisions were deferred to the TPUSA field representative even though UVU staff members raised concerns, including concerns related to holding the event in the outdoor Fountain Courtyard area and using TPUSA’s ticketing process. TPUSA preferred to hold the event in the Fountain Courtyard and use its own ticketing system rather than the University’s system. Those decisions placed the event in an area that was more difficult to control…”

3. TPUSA kept ticketing and then never issued or checked tickets

“TPUSA preferred … to use its own ticketing system rather than the University’s system. Those decisions … limited UVU’s ability to obtain reliable, real-time information regarding anticipated attendance and crowd size.”

4. TPUSA’s planning questionnaire said there were no safety or security concerns

“The questionnaire projected approximately 600 attendees, described the event as primarily student-focused with some potential public interest, represented no risk factors/safety/security concerns or need for emergency medical services, and offered to connect UVUPD with TPUSA’s head of security.”

5. Security coordination with UVU was late, thin, and never became a real joint plan

Chief Long had to chase a contact after MEAC:
“When he did not hear from Crofts or a member of the TPUSA security team following the MEAC meeting, Chief Long attempted to follow up… On September 2, he emailed a staff member in the University’s Clubs Office seeking contact information for TPUSA’s security representative because no member of the TPUSA security team had contacted him following his request to Crofts.”

6. TPUSA’s protection detail did not request the briefing the report calls essential

“The absence of a formal pre-event briefing and coordinated walk-through with Brian Harpole, Dan Flood, and the TPUSA security team was a critical missed opportunity.”

“The Project Team finds it particularly significant that an on-site pre-event briefing was not requested by the TPUSA protection detail.” 👀

7. TPUSA security focused on one walkway, not a full elevated-position plan

The report says TPUSA’s documented concern was the Hall of Flags walkway above the canopy, not a broader rooftop/line-of-sight assessment:

“These text exchanges revealed the primary security focus for TPUSA was the Hall of Flags outdoor pedestrian walkway above the canopy.”

8. Harpole’s later public account conflicted with the documentary record

The report states that Harpole’s podcast version of who chose the venue does not match the evidence:

“Harpole further stated that the venue location was selected by UVU and that UVU told TPUSA, ‘Nope, this is where you have to have it.’ This was one of the primary reasons the Project Team sought to speak directly with Harpole, since this particular statement and a number of others Harpole made conflicted with what the Project Team learned from reviewing evidence and conducting numerous interviews… UVU had expressed concerns about the outdoor location, including during the August 25 MEAC meeting, but ultimately agreed to TPUSA’s requested venue location when TPUSA representative Maycee Crofts insisted on it. … the initial e-mail request from TPUSA to UVU on July 10, 2025, also specifically requested that the event be held at the Fountain Courtyard.”

The report also notes Harpole said his team had drones but did not use them, and that the podcast “did not include any discussion of whether Harpole’s team worked with UVUPD to address other elevated roof area concerns near the venue."

[Trisha Hope - National Delegate-TX @JustTheTweets17]

@TPUSA put Charlie in the most dangerous position they could the night before he told his security team he thought he'd be killed. That's not an accident.

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@Joshua_the_car So who do you recommend we watch? You?

Trying to police the content that other ADULTS consume is not only childish, but it's faggot behavior! I hope whatever you all are being paid is worth burning in hell. 😘

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@lisaknows429 Shutup fed bitch

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@DOCMAGA1 @ChewingTheVoid Shutup faggot

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@joyfuljodi23 @BlakeSNeff @nosoup4knowles Shut up you bot bitch.

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@BlakeSNeff Shut your bald headed ass up!

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@BlakeSNeff Minor correction: what you’ve described is a public “SHOW” trial, not simply a public trial. The distinction matters. Transparency and due process aren’t the same thing as a proceeding designed to shape public perception.

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@pagelsfolife

[Dave Smith @ComicDaveSmith]

If Massie loses tonight, he should run for President.

If Massie wins tonight, he should run for President.

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@FoldARPrez

[Grokiesha @Grokiesha]

@jyapsalot Right! Because, What do you mean by that?