The National Gallery Citzens' Jury was a cynical exercise in manufacturing support for transformational changes. An unrepresentative sample was hand-picked and given a narrow assignment. Then they were led to the answer by approved cultural entrepreneurs with no dissenting voice.
You know what I really want from a national gallery? Pictures. Pictures on walls. That's it.
Maybe a little plaque next to them listing the title, artist, date, and what movement it represents.
What I don't want - and would frankly pay good money to never have to suffer through again - are 'installations' or insufferable woke lectures on how the cis-normative artist used imagery of waterlilies to impose patriarchal ideas of femininity onto unsuspecting female members of his audience, or any other similar nonsense.
@NationalGallery - just let us view the pictures in peace, for God's sake.
@SebMilbank You might be right! I'm no strategist. But I've followed the Citizens' Juries closely and I'm worried. I hope you're right that it's hysteria.
@SebMilbank Did you see the NG documentary years ago? There was a fascinating exchange between Nicholas Penny and an earnest woke curator. I think there's a lot of internal pressure and the Jury was a major intervention on that side.
@SebMilbank He's been great and I've followed closely. But a lot of colleagues would like to go woke, and their recent Citizens' Jury looks like an institutional attempt to force that agenda forward.
The bell tolls for National Gallery, London. Yesterday, the NG announced plans for sweeping changes. Phrases such as "taking an audience- and customercentric approach in everything we do", "removing barriers to engagement" and "reach new, more diverse visitors" will send a chill down your spine. (1/2)
Why did the National Trust "queer" the Ham House Chapel? I've written about this extraordinary treatment of a Christian place of worship @Telegraph in next post...
@eliblee Is it really especially true in economics? I have high confidence that economics will end up looking much better than other disciplines. Worst problem is probably already obvious: application of high rigour to unimportant topics.
@Aella_Girl Interesting - I'm kinda the opposite. Very high neuroticism on five factors, and I am self-conscious, but extremely comfortable talking to strangers. Supports your thesis that there's another dimension here.