The Brave Nobel Lord

Dominicans First, the world second.
Showcasing Dominican History & Sovereignty
From Taíno blood to digital rebellion.

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

Im a white Domincan, I hate niggers,spics,jews,jeets and even myself. Chud The Builder is my HERO. I grew up in new york calling niggas bitches 24/7 he is proof that you monkeys are all chimp out retards who dont do shit when a real white ass nigga is going hard as fuck.

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@Chad_Goy @LegacyProgramVP He was in the navy, a complete faggot

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@BFreshDude @Vicious_nut @LegacyProgramVP its what they do , spread the lie like the truth. People who literally saw chuds live and actual live witnesses recount the absolute opposite of what this moron typed. He made up a bunch of bullshit

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@konanomics @ANTHONYBLOGAN you were saying?

https://t.co/gprE8QvwdT

[Andrew Branca Show @TheBrancaShow]

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY!

TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached).

This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT.

All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you.

FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE.

NOT. ONE. WORD.

That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest.

But it gets even BETTER for Dalton.

SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.)

Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever.

I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads:

"... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse."

This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course).

"During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..."

There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance."

"... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket."

Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket."

"Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued."

Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation."

Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation.

This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him.

The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times."

There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table.

Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls."

Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness.

Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly.

I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness.

Not a single element. Not a word of it.

If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action.

Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever.

At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint."

If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits.

HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H).

https://t.co/0CGqlDtmuO

@AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

[Pollen8TV 🦋 @POLLEN8TV]

Dalton "Chud the Builder" Official Bond Hearing Update

REG INSTABUL PLANE TICKET : this was for a promotion event to play poker with, he had no reason for "fleeing"

Bond reset from $1.25 million to $1 million. He stays in custody while the court reviews his source of funds. They want to determine whether donations from platforms like GiveSendGo can be used for bond. They have NOT ruled against him using these funds - source hearing required.

If released, the conditions are GPS monitoring, surrender of all firearms, a gag order prohibiting him from discussing the case on social media or in interviews, passport surrender, and travel restrictions.
The case is now bound over to grand jury. Preliminary hearing still set for May 26.

New evidence from today: at least 12 courthouse cameras captured the altercation. Prosecutors say Eatherly reached for his weapon first. Seven shots fired total. He claims self-defense and says he was reaching reflexively for mace, which he ALWAYS has on him but was confiscated a week prior by police.

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@RuddArjen @ArchetypeTheory this can clearly be proved by a good lawyer during the trial. the grand jury hasnt heard it yet because the trial hasnt started.

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@DameDarhk @ArchetypeTheory you work for the opposition why are you here?

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@ArchetypeTheory prosecutors are clearly race mixing jews /white cucks/ and mudsharks with an agenda. They botch so many self defense cases they think they can just fuck him over and no one will say anything, you better believe real americans support and feel just like chud regardless of color

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@WyronGaines Also to answer the stupid niggers question, a punch that has equal to a gunshot and justified by a court of law is another high profile case he is familiar with. The death of king von was caused by a punch. Courts later ruled it JUSTIFIED

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@numberoneSAHD @groyp4l @TheBrancaShow locked in = down for life , homies, tapped in, friendship, respect, companionship. What the fuck else do i need to say so you can comprehend

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@numberoneSAHD @groyp4l @TheBrancaShow nah nigga youre fuking retarded

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@Arlieredeyejedi @numberoneSAHD @groyp4l @TheBrancaShow @numberoneSAHD why are you so fucking retarded that you cannot comprehend this shit READ THIS

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@numberoneSAHD @jlynnbatts @anon01123581321 @TheBrancaShow @FightClipFilms @groyp4l because youre not making any fucking sense you unhinged failed schizophrenic laywer wannabe

[Andrew Branca Show @TheBrancaShow]

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY!

TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached).

This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT.

All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you.

FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE.

NOT. ONE. WORD.

That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest.

But it gets even BETTER for Dalton.

SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.)

Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever.

I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads:

"... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse."

This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course).

"During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..."

There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance."

"... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket."

Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket."

"Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued."

Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation."

Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation.

This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him.

The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times."

There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table.

Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls."

Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness.

Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly.

I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness.

Not a single element. Not a word of it.

If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action.

Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever.

At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint."

If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits.

HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H).

https://t.co/0CGqlDtmuO

@AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@MyronGainesX @JoeBuddenPod Fuck that nigga joe budden his pussy ass got punched out by raekwon slapped by consequence and bitch slapped by a random person from someones crew. This guy has a history of L's recorded on the internet for the last 25 years. See for yourself

https://t.co/Y1hVYHUxSF

[Myron Gaines @MyronGainesX]

This clown @JoeBuddenPod is the biggest faggot on the internet.

[Myron Gaines @MyronGainesX]

Chud is has a valid self defense claim. The usual suspects are about to chimp out now 😂🫵🏽🐒

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@MyronGainesX @Poetikflakko bruh wtf is wrong with his legs???

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@MyronGainesX HAHAHAHA MONKEYS !!!! PLEASE GO LIVE !!!

[Dale Partridge @dalepartridge]

Textbook anti-white racism is this:

Black guy murders a white girl and rapes her corpse for a week.

$15k bond.

White guy defends himself against a black attacker for saying “a word.”

$1.25m bond.

[The Brave Nobel Lord @Guari0nex]

@idijama123 @int3rrupt3d @redpillclipperx @MyronGainesX @AkademiksTV @TheOSSGeneral @WyronGaines @myrongainesclip these nigger fucks are seething until the trial