@nuwandiss I suppose that the legal rep can put forward any challenge as they see fit. A similar common argument in MHTs is that a recall may be no quicker than a arranging MHA Ax, but of course they are failing to understand that recall does necessarily = inpatient admission.
@HarryMaguire93 You might want to spend the summer trying to understand the concepts of humility, dignity and integrity. Your best wishes for 'the players' appear far from genuine.
@wendyburn@nuwandiss Yes, that's a nonsense approach. The Code makes it clear that the least restrictive principle is about 'detention or not', because of course, s.2 is no less restrictive than s.3.
@1968Tv Lots of people laud England in that World Cup, but we were generally mediocre/awful against Netherlands, Ireland, Egypt, Belgium and Cameroon. Arguably our best performance was the one we lost!
@MentalHealthCop In short, the new power is a mechanism to facilitate conditional discharge, it is not an authority to deprive the person of their liberty.
@MentalHealthCop It would depend on the situation at the time, because whilst this new power allows P to be cond. d/c in circs that means they will be deprived of their liberty, it provides no authority for the residence to actually deprive liberty; that authority must be found elsewhere.
@geoff_speight@MentalHealthCop Itโs an attempt to plug a โloopholeโ whereby the Tribunal and SoS were previously unable to conditionally discharge someone with conditions that amount to deprivation if liberty.
@MentalHealthCop Hi Michael, if hand delivered to last known address, service is deemed to be the day after, which includes 'non-business' days; see Reg 6(6)(b) in here:
https://t.co/spld0SEDFE