Olivia
Online
⛏️HCRick⛏️
@HCRick1
Mine $NAK. Stop NWO, WHO. Support Vets, elderly and hospice patients. Firm up your faith.
Joined March 2022
546 Following
127 Followers
93 Posts
@AmericaPulseNew Get Thune out in whatever way possible and as soon as possible
@gregmadder Protocol please
Who to follow
Delta Harbour Assets 
@DeltaHarbour
Delta Harbour provides its clients with the tools necessary to take control of their wealth outside of the traditional banking system using Gold and Silver.
⚜️A.W.⚜️
@AWagny
ROYALISTE, MONARCHISTE, SUPPORTER DU PARIS SG ET AMOUREUX DE PARIS, VIVE LE ROY, ALLEZ PARIS ⚜️⚜️⚜️❤💙🇮🇹
S
@Shunbaseball228
G党 #6坂本勇人
@pvtjokerus PTL, but why isn't he in an orange jumpsuit yet?
@TruthHurtsTKV Happy, Happy, Happy.
@MarcMilette Appreciate you much Mr. Marc 👍
Foreign (Noncitizen) Labor: We All Heard the Expression … “Dead Man Walking”
Now imagine living it! Courtesy of American Corporations!
Too many American citizens are being displaced, laid off, or pushed aside while companies rely on foreign noncitizen labor, offshore contractors, visas, green cards, international students, and AI substitution.
The ONLY Structural Solution:
Phase 1: Transparency First — Make ALL Legal Non-Citizen Labor fully visible.
Phase 2: Real Accountability.
Read the full plan here:
👉 https://t.co/gYuHQH7nft
Who’s with me? Repost if you want American CITIZEN workers to come first again
You have every right to know what your government is doing, and they have no right to know what you are doing.
That is why they are called public servants and we are called private citizens.
Instead, the relationship has been inverted. The state hides behind secrecy, classified files, and redactions while demanding total visibility into your finances, communications, movement, and behavior.
A society where the rulers live in privacy while the population lives under surveillance is the very definition of tyranny.
@DataRepublican @LeaderJohnThune @POTUS @SenateGOP #cruz #Cronyn Thune is way beyond any change of colors or tactics. No sense for any begs or threats directed at him. ALL the GOP senators are now complicate. Cronyn & Cruz are my state's "GOP" senators. We will get rid of both and every other state with GOP senators do it also.
@HouseLyndseyRN So happy to see your recovered face. Peace, Love PTL
@ThrillaRilla369 middle finger
@Sassafrass_84 2 of my best friends on earth...sadly succumbed to the death jabs 'special vaccination shots' within a short time after the jab. Both "elderly" at 11 & 14 human years. Both fully vac'd since day one. Never again, never again
@runews YOOYFM there, I said it.
Everything anyone may want to know about Pebble Mine $NAK current status
🏔️ NAK Nation — Monday Analysis Post 🏔️
A quick reminder before I get into today's post.
As previously communicated X is discontinuing its Communities feature at the end of May. That includes the NAK Pebble Mine Community. If you have not already done so, please follow me directly on X now so you do not lose the connection to this analysis going forward.
While you’re at it, I’d also like to encourage NAK Nation to follow some of the other outstanding content creators in this community — Tye, Kris, Joseph, and others who have done exceptional work keeping everyone informed and engaged. This story is best understood from multiple perspectives, so these are voices worth following directly before the community disappears.
Now let me tell you what the next seven weeks are going to look like.
THE VETO UNRAVELS
That is the name of the series I am launching today.
I chose those three words carefully. Not because I am promising you a specific outcome. I am not a lawyer and I never oversell certainty that does not exist in a legal case. But because when you read the actual documents in this case the ones EPA filed the ones DOJ filed the ones PLP filed and the Supreme Court rulings that changed the legal landscape after the veto was issued what you find is remarkable.
This series has one purpose. To take the most important legal case in this project's history and explain it in plain language so that every person in this community understands exactly what is at stake and exactly what the documents actually show. The best investment decisions come from the best information. My job in this series is not to tell you what to think. It is to make sure you have access to the same documented evidence that the lawyers in this case are arguing about in front of a federal judge. Armed with that information you can draw your own conclusions. No hype. No agenda. Just the information you deserve to have.
The legal foundation underlying this veto has faced increasing pressure since the day it was issued. Not because of political pressure. Not because of advocacy. But because of legal questions embedded in EPA's own administrative record that the courts are now required to confront under a very different judicial framework than existed in January 2023.
For two years this community has watched and waited. You have held through dilution through political reversals through what felt like endless delay. You stayed because you believed in the asset. You believed in the deposit. And you believed that eventually the legal system would have to confront the legal and factual questions embedded in the record.
That reckoning is now 45 days away.
I have spent months reading the primary source documents in this case. EPA's Final Determination. The Response to Comments. The DOJ brief. The plaintiff briefs. The Supreme Court decisions that reshaped administrative law after the veto was issued. And what I found is a case that is materially stronger than most retail investors realize. Stronger than the promoters will tell you because they have obvious incentives. And stronger than many skeptics appreciate because the governing legal framework changed significantly after the veto was issued.
What I am going to do over the next thirteen posts is show you exactly what I found. In plain language. Grounded in the actual documents. No hype. No guarantees. Just the documented evidence the governing legal framework and the honest analysis they support.
By the time June 25 arrives you will understand this case better than most people who have followed this story for years. You will understand what Judge Gleason is being asked to decide. You will understand why several aspects of the veto's legal foundation are now genuinely vulnerable in a post-Sackett and post-Loper Bright environment. And you will be able to watch oral argument and understand in real time what the questions mean and where they may point.
That is what The Veto Unravels is.
Thirteen posts of document-based analysis for a community that has earned the right to understand exactly what is happening.
What Is Coming — All Thirteen Posts
Here is exactly what is coming and why each post matters.
Post 1 today. The three streams framework and why the court case is the near term catalyst but permitting reform is the permanent solution.
Post 2 Thursday May 15. What oral argument actually is. Most people following this story have never watched federal court litigation before. Before June 25 you need to understand what is actually happening in that room.
Post 3 Monday May 19. Who is Judge Sharon Gleason and how does she think. Her background. Her track record on complex cases. What her handling of this specific case may tell us about how she approaches agency legal errors.
Post 4 Thursday May 22. Where all three streams stand right now heading into the final stretch before June 25. The complete picture for new readers and a strategic refresher for veterans.
Post 5 Monday May 26. Argument One. A statement in EPA's own administrative record that became materially more important after the Supreme Court's Sackett decision four months later.
Post 6 Thursday May 29. Argument Two. EPA's own lawyers described their statutory interpretation in a specific way in their court brief. Under current Supreme Court doctrine that wording may carry far more significance than many investors realize.
Post 7 Monday June 1. Argument Three. A problem with how EPA drew a line on a map. 309 square miles. No separate economic analysis. 66 times larger than any prior action in the fifty year history of this law. This may represent one of the cleanest pathways to a ruling in the entire case.
Post 8 Thursday June 4. Arguments Four and Five. Something the government lawyers chose not to request in their brief. And something EPA did that had never been done before in the entire history of the Clean Water Act.
Post 9 Monday June 8. Inside the courtroom. What oral argument actually looks like in real time. What Judge Gleason is doing when she asks questions. How to interpret what you are watching as it happens.
Post 10 Thursday June 11. The specific questions Judge Gleason may ask on June 25 and what each question could signal about where the court's concerns are focused.
Post 11 Monday June 15. A recent public statement that describes in precise legal terms the exact framework now placing pressure on the Pebble veto. Pebble Mine was never mentioned directly. But the description fits perfectly.
Post 12 Thursday June 19. How the five arguments work together and why having multiple independent pathways to relief matters more than relying on any single argument alone.
Post 13 Monday June 23. Two days out. Everything you need to know for June 25. A complete guide to the hearing what to watch for and what every possible outcome means for the investment thesis.
Thirteen posts. Five major legal arguments. One judge. One courtroom. And a legal framework that looks materially different today than it did when the veto was issued in January 2023.
45 Days To Oral Argument
On June 25 2026 attorneys for Northern Dynasty and its partners will stand before United States District Judge Sharon Gleason in a federal courtroom in Anchorage Alaska and argue that the Biden EPA's preemptive veto of the Pebble Mine was unlawful.
45 days from now. On a Thursday.
Before I get into the courtroom I want to make sure NAK Nation understands where the court case fits in the bigger picture. Because this is not the only thing happening right now.
Chapter 1: The Three Streams
I have been writing for months about what I call the three streams framework. Three independent pathways all moving simultaneously toward the same destination. The removal of the Biden EPA's preemptive veto and the eventual development of the world's largest undeveloped copper deposit.
Stream One is the court case before Judge Gleason. Oral argument June 25. Written ruling to follow. Multiple significant legal arguments that I will walk through in detail over the coming weeks.
Stream Two is the administrative stream. The new WOTUS rule being finalized by the Trump EPA. If finalized in line with current proposals it could significantly complicate the jurisdictional foundation underlying portions of the veto. This stream advances regardless of what Judge Gleason ultimately decides.
Stream Three is the legislative stream. Permitting reform. The SPEED Act. The PERMIT Act. The Critical Mineral Dominance Act. All passed the House. Senate action expected this summer.
And here is the most important thing I want NAK Nation to understand about these three streams.
The legislative stream is the most important of the three. Not the court case.
I know that seems counterintuitive when oral argument is 45 days away and the courtroom is getting all the attention. But here is why the legislative stream matters most in the long run.
A court ruling can be appealed. A regulatory rule can be rewritten by a future hostile administration. But when Congress writes something into law it takes an act of Congress to undo it. The PERMIT Act would permanently ban preemptive vetoes of the kind EPA issued against Pebble Mine. The SPEED Act would protect issued permits from arbitrary revocation. Codified law is the only thing that provides the investor certainty needed to commit the five to ten billion dollars required to actually build this mine.
The court case is the near term catalyst. Permitting reform is the permanent solution.
But that does not mean winning in court does not matter. It matters enormously. And I want to be clear about why.
A favorable ruling from Judge Gleason could vacate portions of the veto outright narrow portions of it or send parts of it back to EPA under a materially different legal framework than existed when the veto was issued. Any of those outcomes could have major implications for the permitting path going forward.
It could allow PLP to resume movement through the permitting process without the same legal uncertainty hanging over every step. It could send a significant signal to capital markets that the regulatory landscape surrounding this project is changing. It could strengthen momentum behind the legislative stream by reinforcing concerns about the breadth of EPA's asserted authority. And
it could constrain how future administrations attempt to use similar veto theories against other critical mineral projects across the country.
In other words a court win does not replace permitting reform. But it accelerates everything. It clears the path. It builds the momentum. And it delivers a near term catalyst that the legislative stream alone cannot provide on the same timeline.
The court case is the near term catalyst. Permitting reform is the permanent solution. And right now both are moving forward simultaneously.
What Is Coming Thursday
Thursday I start with what oral argument actually is. Before you can understand what happens on June 25 you need to understand what is actually happening in that room and why it is so different from anything you have seen on television.
Do not miss a single post. Follow me directly on X. Follow Tye. Follow Kris. Follow Joseph. And share this with everyone in your network who follows this story.
The NAK Pebble Mine Community disappears at the end of May. The story does not.
Stay locked in NAK Nation. 🇺🇸🏔️
#NAKNation #PebbleMine #TheVetoUnravels #OralArgument #JudgeGleason #June25 #CriticalMinerals #NorthernDynasty #AlaskaComeback #CopperDemand #CleanWaterAct #PermittingReform #ThreeStreams #SPEEDAct #PERMITAct #WOTUS #SarahPalin #Alaska #AlaskaFirst #DrillBabyDrill #AmericaFirst #MineAmerica
Up 5.51% in just over a month...
On 550 million shares, that's...
That is an increase of institutional ownership to the tune of 30.3 million shares.
Amen 💪🛢️
But also need the green light to tap our abundant critical minerals & rare earths. Trump can dump Biden’s illegal veto & OPEN #PebbleMine $NAK no more playing politics on this… our state & nation’s solvency & sovereignty depend on Alaska’s proven-responsible extraction! #MineBabyMine #DrillBabyDrill #NoMoreWar (because it’s always about energy!!)
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.2M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.3M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.4M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.8M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.4M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.4M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.1M followers