@SIN3R6Y@CappyWallet 👍 i would love to see the best fiat onramp Rampnow in ypur wallet. That would be an onboarding gamechanger.
https://t.co/C6dmqJAL1H
Cappy early website is up: https://t.co/lnvhzelcDi
Cappy X account: @CappyWallet
Just wanted thank you guys for all the support on this. This is just the tip of the iceberg, there are a lot of things I plan to do in as short as possible of order. Couldn't do it without you guys.
I'll be splitting updates between my personal / Cappy X accounts. I've been asked many times how people can help, I put some info on the site for now.
Anyways, less talking more doing. The roadmap on the site is accurate as of right now. But I'm moving fast.
I want this wallet to exist so I can enjoy it too.
I've been working in silence for quite a while now. Tbh, I don't really even know where to start, so cue the rambling and ranting.
Regardless of which side of the fence you sit on, no one can argue the past few years haven't been politically and economically wild. For crypto as a whole it feels like a never ending game of tug of war.
A lot of X content has become toxic, so I just largely am not interacting these days. But I read, I read a lot of it. I think we like to forget history a bit in this community. $PLS launched off the highs, and the SEC swooped in right after.
Very few people want to admit it, but it shook confidence immediately. I mean no other crypto project has survived such a thing at the time. But #PLS $PLSX and $HEX did. However, winning doesn't unshake that confidence. And RH during and after that event took social precautions to protect himself and his creations.
Thing is, the guy isn't stupid. Someone once asked me if I thought certain aspects of the launch we rushed because he knew it was coming? And honestly, maybe. I'd attribute at least a non-zero probability to it. And If that were the case, im glad it was rushed. That case may have gone differently otherwise.
Do I still think #PulseChain, #HEX, etc... all have futures? Yes. RH has had the opportunity to just straight up bounce from all of this. Why hasn't he? You could point to exhibit A, B, C, D, etc... of how he's likely got the funds to do that and we all could relatively do nothing about it.
So why is he still around? I think it's pretty simple. The usual answer, he wants to win. It's in his twitter handle for Christs sakes. I'll go a step further and say he likely also wants us to win by extension, arguably not as much as he wins, but I mean that's pretty locked in at the moment 🤣
That's not to say he hasn't long been encumbered. And in that state, at lot has gone on without him. Much of which is / was bad. $pDAI guys... I pointed out from day one how building all this around a protocol in a dangerous state was a risky move. And I was right about that.... on multiple occasions... But does that matter now? I suppose not as much. In its current state, it's seemingly no longer exploitable. No different than a meme token now. (presumably, not like I have deep dove on any further risks since ESM). So I guess just whale risk mainly now?
Now a lot of people here are in the anti-pdai camp. Me too for what it's worth. But I don't care as much about it's negative anymore in its current state. A lot of people are still in the #pDAI camp strongly. We view this as tribalism, but it's important to note that makes all of us in the #PulseChain camp universally. So these day I find myself relatively pDAI neutral. If you guys want to send it to $1 do it. Only whales can stop you, they run out eventually. (insert super strong this is NOT financial advice). Hell you can maybe even use Sigma to help? Or maybe it wont help, idk. Depends on how people use the software.
Conversely, when looking at chain state overall... Why is there nearly $50M in stables sitting on the sidelines. Why not just bridge it out if you want out of what you think is a dead chain. Surely leaving it there exposes you to bridge risk? Why all these yield movements, why the $HEX dusts.... Something is happening. People are seemingly waiting to see what that something is. Or I am reading into things, NFA as always. This whole post is just ramblings of someone trying to do the best they can and certainly not any kind of advice.
When I look at other ecosystems, I see a level of polish we don't have. I see tooling we don't have, I see a fostered developer environment we don't have. So I've just been building it, painstakingly.... Because someone has to if we want to be taken seriously.
And what I've been building has allowed me to get Sigma to where it is. Sigma is so close... Really just in UI mode, performance optimization, going through nice to haves. I don't believe in launching in a non-finished immutable state. So yeah, I take my time. As with everything.
But my point with all of this, and the "why" #Sigma question.... It's unifying, anyone can participate. Which tribe you're in doesn't matter. And if you don't like it, don't use it. It's just software you can use or not use. As it should be.
The years of tooling work to deliver this has been a lot of work for one guy in silence. In that time AI has appeared. My take, every dev should be using it. Given the right direction and context. It will make you better. If you blindly trust it, it will make you worse. GPT 5.4 audits smart contracts better than most auditing services. Especially if you give it the context of what you are trying to do.
Anyways I digress, testnet is soon. Soon more meaning a feeling of near completion not always reality. That how software is. I do think Sigma stands to unify the chain in a common goal, and shift liquidity into more meaningful places, but ultimately it up to the people the decide to use the software or not use it.
And after these frameworks I've built will be applied to what I am tentatively calling the universal hex UI. More or less something aggregative of every derivative I can reasonably support. With data and analytics we since lost. So not just $HEX, $HDRN, and $ICSA, but others as well. However, that depends on some aspect of $Sigma to exist first, so sigma first, chain unity first.
And last but not least, take care of yourselves and strive to do cool things. If we aren't doing cool things then what's the point?
Hope you think my UI looks good, I spent a while on it.
/rant
Mega, guys.
I strongly encourage @RichardHeartWin to take a closer look at what you’ve consistently proposed, especially around strengthening developer attraction. Your solution holds substantial, still underestimated potential and could be a key driver for long-term investor conviction in the chain. Unfortunately, that signal doesn’t seem to be landing yet.
Read it, @RichardHeartWin 👇
https://t.co/PoTRh0JRx2
Piteas is heading toward a massive upgrade, routing capabilities will be completely rebuilt from scratch and execution will get some game-changing improvements. We’ll take a one-week break to mentally reset, then this process will fully kick off. The core parts of the development are already done, we’re planning to finalize it within a month and roll out the upgrade in June. This isn’t just minor improvements, it means the entire architecture is being redesigned.
Our official AI protocol will be fully activated. It’s been trained on the entire Pulsechain history and liquidity provider algorithms, and it has completed its base testing. This is exactly why we’re making this big move now.
Some key points to note for this upgrade 👇
▪️ Liquidity sources will be handled independently by 4 agents through Piteas native LM, and controlled by a trained 5th module. Some manual liquidity scans will be fully replaced by an autonomous system.
▪️ The homogeneous liquidity approach is changing as well, including additional protections against arbitrage bots. All available liquidity will be accessed 100%, with pure real-time sources free from cache, enabling isolated instant routing.
▪️ Routing capabilities are being completely redesigned. It will scan within a flexible range that expands and contracts based on need. Not going into too much detail for now, let the rest be a surprise.
▪️ Throughout calculation, routing, simulation, and execution, a hidden observer will monitor the process to ensure flawless operation and instantly handle any chain-related issues.
▪️ The final version for tax tokens will be included, permanently solving the known issues.
▪️ On the UI side, a new user protection module will be added. Even if the system is secure, user<>protocol interactions also need protection, so optional shields will be introduced. Unfortunately even if contracts are secure, we can’t fully protect users during interaction, this module will help reduce those risks.
▪️ For the Piteas Token $PTS, phase one is complete. So far 10% of the supply has been fully burned and over 7% is waiting in the burn pipeline. Our deflationary model is working exactly as intended, and our token scarcity philosophy has proven itself independently of recession risks. We’ll all see what phase two brings.
▪️ A portal for partners and API users is also on the way; initially with limited fee charging options, and later evolving into a direct revenue-sharing model.
On top of all this, limit order aggregation, DCA, and experimental strategy-based trading algos are being developed on the Pday side and will be fully compatible with this new architecture. Once ready, they’ll be integrated directly into the core, turning Piteas into a full trading terminal. This will also be the first step toward an open-source expansion, allowing external contributors to join over time.
As always, Piteas will continue to be the leading protocol on Pulsechain, no doubt about it.
For now, a short break…
then we’re coming back full force!
🧙♂️🧙♀️🧙
cc: @RichardHeartWin
Hey LP providers. Consider bonding stable directly with PLS, PLSX, HEX. I'm curious what the PLSX and HEX charts look like if they don't have the majority of their liquidity in PLS. The fractured liquidity might cause more slippage, but allow each coin's merit to be more accurately valued?
Heck, the liquidity is so low, if there was a good time to experiment, it'd probably be now? Here's a great thread for the thought experiment.
Do remember, cryfags get le ban.
What works?
🔥 You don’t listen to builders
More and more developers are leaving, not because of price, but because their feedback goes nowhere with you.
Result: talent drain, lower quality, less momentum.
🔥 No stablecoin strategy
PulseChain has no native stablecoin.
The only multichain stable (hUSDC) that was gifted to the chain gets no meaningful liquidity, even though the community donated hundreds of millions.
Result: weak DeFi utility, capital cannot park safely, many use cases stay unattractive.
🔥 No clear market positioning and no branding
There is no clear sentence answering: What does PulseChain stand for versus other chains?
🔥 There is no real brand positioning.
Without positioning, marketing cannot deliver a consistent message.
Result: communication feels random, advertisers have no clear story, demand is not built.
🔥 No adaptive developer support
No real DevRel structure (clear contacts, fast response, feedback loops).
No visible grants or incentives program with transparent criteria.
No reliable integration paths.
Result: serious smart contract teams are discouraged immediately.
🔥 Technical stagnation and missing basics
For three years, no meaningful chain updates and no visible technical momentum.
🚨 Not even one fully working explorer. The basic infrastructure is buggy.
Result: no future signal. People do not want to bet on something that stays this stagnant and does not even offer a roadmap ⚠️ as a credibility anchor.
🔥 Amateur public presence
pulsechain_com looks unprofessional and has poor usability.
A professional offer for the ecosystem was made (less than $200k for a proper relaunch and strong positioning) and it gets ignored.
Result: loss of trust from users, partners, and developers.
🔥 Wrong focus: X subcomments instead of execution
You frame everything as market and price.
You spend time on pointless comments on X that cannot move anything, instead of building foundations or talking with the devs.
Result: no substance, no progress signals, no course correction.
🔥 You are demotivating the people who brought life to the chain
Do you not notice how the people who actually brought life to the chain are getting demotivated and going quiet?
You think you are enough, but you are wrong. Understand it, or you will end up as solo power at best, a brief flare in a better market.
🔥 It is not “just the market”
We said months ago what is necessary. Keep ignoring it, but do not be surprised by the outcome. 🤷♂️
🚨 No, @RichardHeartWin : it is not only market conditions or price. There are deeper structural issues that have been called out for a long time.
I have never seen this community in a state where influencers think they can actively go against Richard & win, as if they think they have a bigger influence than him.
May your humbling be a lesson learned so #PulseChain can move forward. RH will have the last say, trust me.
$PLS $PLSX $HEX
After almost three years, we still don’t even have a fully functional PulseChain explorer. Don’t expect to be taken seriously by the broader market if even the most basic tool can’t run without errors. To this day, the Transfer tab still isn’t reliably functional on a consistent basis. It’s unfortunate that the community has been pointing this out for nearly three years without it being fixed. Do you really not grasp how much credibility is being damaged at a point like this?
New features I feel will be releasing soon, but aren't out just yet. 1. https://t.co/YziFPT0ZbE code that supports trading AFTER graduation. 2. add/remove liquidity on same screen. 3. user profile shows token balance and $ val. 4. Protocol stats page. 5. Search in table by user address, username, type (trade, burn or liquidity.) 6. Full transaction history for each coin with full index of coin holder balances. 6. Updates from mined block to UI in about a second.
I hear someone is working on a multi-wallet https://t.co/XSf55kraIc as well.
I'm still here doing the right things. Lots of people are gone, or worse, doing the wrong things.
I persist.
Make some noise if you would like to see a @joerogan and @RichardHeartWin podcast!
Hey Joe, big fan. If you're looking to talk to the most wanted man who beat the SEC, rumored billionaire, crypto expert, and leader of a cult community, he's your guy.
$PLS $PLSX $HEX
For days now, FUD fake news has been circulating claiming that HEXscout is selling. “The blockchain doesn’t lie.” Yes, we already know this topic from pDai 🤣. Indeed, the blockchain does not lie. Only those who interpret it do 😉, especially when they do so with absolute certainty instead of transparently telling their followers that this is merely a possibly completely nonsensical interpretation and not actual knowledge.
We are on vacation, enjoying life, and apart from this statement we will not say anything further on the matter. Everyone is free to think whatever they want 😘. However, the actions of these influencers once again make obvious the self-sabotage that our ecosystem repeatedly suffers from.🥳
HEXscout makes no secret of the fact that we will withdraw from our investments significantly earlier than was still the grand life plan half a year ago, should our very clearly and transparently communicated expectations for more substance and professionalism continue to be ignored. But we are still far from saying goodbye to our bags as well. In the end, we are now merely a small individual on the chain who either feels sufficiently comfortable or does not. Just a spectator who has to let himself be surprised by the play on stage, but of course is free to leave if he does not like the performance enough.
We are all experiencing the ecosystem’s first bull run together. None of us would be so naive as to think that our time, even if perhaps with more limitation of potential than in some naive fantasies, will not come once the overall market gains momentum.
The only thing that made us step back from WORKING for the ecosystem was the fact that our work and our optimization proposals met with too little meaningful support and were thus driven into inefficient absurdity, for which we personally are no longer willing to sacrifice our time or go the extra mile.
We built the community the best HEX brand site, organized the fastest and best fiat on-ramp, and secured the best cross-chain bridge with Hyperlane, as well as freeing PulseChain from its single point of failure, both in terms of a) the “main bridge” and b) the multichain-backed hUSDC with regard to stablecoins, and c) the previous sole dependency on Ethereum, which no longer exists. What the ecosystem makes of this, or does not, is now up to it. We remain invested and certainly will not be deterred by the lowest depths of a depression. ;) Have fun and good luck. ❤️
@brian_armstrong@CoinbaseDev@base Since you're listing everything, give PulseChain a shot, it's had flawless operation for a few years. I wouldn't bother you, but since it's actually decentralized there's no fancy entity to fill out your forms.
Yes, unfortunately we are aware of how a number of serious investors currently assess the recent developments, and we regret this situation.
We hope that the current events are not left without consequence, but instead help clarify an important distinction: the difference between emotionally driven, largely price-related frustration, which can be dismissed as cryfagging, and well-founded, constructive criticism that merits careful consideration.
If leading supporters continue to feel unheard, this risks creating dynamics that can reasonably be described as self-sabotaging. Such perceptions inevitably send signals into the broader community and may erode long-term confidence among investors. In practical terms, this can contribute to increasing sell pressure at lower price levels. Within this relevant investor segment, a sentiment is becoming more common: “I would be satisfied simply to recover my initial investment.”
This would be less concerning if it were limited to short-term or weakly committed participants. However, recent observations suggest that these dynamics are beginning to affect structures that are essential for an ecosystem to persist across multiple cycles. This represents a relatively new development in recent weeks and should be understood in its full significance.
We have outlined possible approaches that could demonstrate to the ecosystem that lessons have been learned and that concerns are being addressed (→ https://t.co/TPnk7VbIOk). These steps are neither complex nor unrealistic, but they do require implementation, @RichardHeartWin. Time is a relevant factor, and prolonged inaction increases the risk of lasting damage that may, in parts, be difficult to reverse.
Whoever initiated this unfortunately once again shows that they are either not even capable of reading properly or simply not capable of assessing what is important for the ecosystem.
We stated very clearly that HEXscout can be preserved as a project under a different entity and therefore does not have to suffer as a result of our personal decision to the detriment of the community.
Now, without any necessity, it is being turned into a disadvantage for the community.
This is to the detriment of the ecosystem.
Another act of self-sabotage 🤷♂️, and it underscores what is going so wrong and why we no longer want to emotionally expose ourselves to this through our work.
"...healthy prices require pain. Those who cannot walk the journey must be washed out, freeing space for new, hungry, energized participants. This constant renewal strengthens the foundation from cycle to cycle, even if it hurts in between. So if it dips, let it dip. If OG pain is needed, so be it. There should be no market making in a bear market depression. Better we start the new ecosystem with a hard core and new strength than with a large mass of millionaire crybabies."
https://t.co/6LGYgZeWIn