@primarily_prog Just listened to the first couple of tracks. Lovely stuff. Gotta love a Hammond organ. Thanks for pointing out this one - a new one for me.
@YesterdaysBrit1 Repetition in comforting in comedy. I understand that this wasn’t everyone’s “cup of tea” but it had a marvellous Britishness about it. Could never be made today as stereotypes aren’t funny - apparently.
@TheNorskaPaul And I suppose education, languages, English and physiology departments will be advertising for cis or trans men also to address gender imbalance?
@TheNorskaPaul Just in time for the next good weather hopefully. (Or climate change heat wave as we now call it). Enjoy the staff party and the holidays!
@simonso15792314@YesterdaysBrit1@Rainmaker1973 Ok. I don’t want to get into a pedantic argument, but seeing as you are being argumentative, let me tell you that you are simply wrong. The Mach “term” is not what you think, it is a ratio of the speed of an object to the speed of sound in that medium. Undefined for a vacuum.
@simonso15792314@YesterdaysBrit1@Rainmaker1973 I don’t wish to be patronising, but I appreciate it will come across that way. You need to understand what a Mach number represents. The Mach 2 for Concorde was (correctly) based on the speed of sound at the altitude it flew at. There is no Mach number for a vacuum.
@VWolf83864177@MathMath901 But the answer to the question is A or B - not all of them as you have said. Your value of vi in the equation is the vertical velocity. A and B have a larger vi so therefore a larger vf.