H. Tuttle

Overalled folks just sorting out snakes and ladders.

[Kevin McKernan @Kevin_McKernan]

Hey @GovCanHealth
You asked Pfizer to remove SV40 for all the wrong reasons.

Your argument is centered on the negative public impression of SV40, not the functional risks it presents.

You do this in the same breath as redacting most of the document.

You know what creates a negative public opinion on vaccines…

All the black ink delivered when the public asks what’s in them.

[TheLastRefuge @TheLastRefuge2]

All Carney had to do was to stop importing Chinese steel and aluminum. He refused.

Now, Carney is blaming the USA because he chose to import Chinese steel and aluminum, and that action resulted in Canada losing steel and aluminum manufacturing.

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@elonmusk Anyone of limited means that has paid for a wedding knows that you can have an open invitation for anyone that wants to attend, or you can have an open and free bar at the reception. Having both invites financial disaster.

[Grant Abraham @grantsabraham]

For all the real Canadians out there that want to see our nations’ sovereignty permanently established, the shattering of the NWO’s grip in North America and a deep clean up - be very clear that a YES vote on Oct 19th in the Alberta Referendum will be the rock that shatters the post-national plans to enslave.

Tyranny doesn’t negotiate. Only ‘vested interest’ beta’s will try to convince you that it does.

Chamberlain taught us this already.

@sjkokinda

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

I’m supposed to perform the obligatory little ritual now and pretend both versions of this trade debacle deserve equal credibility.

I don’t... I believe the Americans.

Not because they’re American. Not because politicians suddenly became trustworthy. And certainly not because Donald Trump has been canonized.

I believe them because the American account increasingly makes more sense.

Greer, Lutnick and Bessent have spoken openly and specifically about what happened. Their accounts have been remarkably consistent. They can discuss the negotiations like people who were actually involved in them, without appearing terrified that an unsupervised adjective might escape and without a teleprompter.

Meanwhile, what do Canadians get from our own government?

Carefully sterilized language. Vague explanations. Missing specifics. Scripted talking points. Every sentence apparently passed through enough communications people and lawyers to remove any detectable trace of information.

We’re being kept in the dark like bloody mushrooms while learning more about Canada’s own trade negotiations from American officials and American media than from the Canadian government supposedly representing us.

And somehow we’re not supposed to notice how politically convenient the Canadian version is.

We got:
👉🏻 Trump was unreasonable.
👉🏻 Trump changed the deal.
👉🏻 Trump threatened our sovereignty.
👉🏻 Trump forced Canada to walk away.

Trump. Trump. Trump.

Just keep Canadians sufficiently pissed off at Donald Trump and perhaps nobody asks the considerably more inconvenient question:

❓️ What exactly did Mark Carney walk away from, and why?

Because after the Gordie Howe Bridge fiasco, I’m fresh out of complimentary benefit of the doubt.

And here’s the part that absolutely reeks, discrediting any appearance of truth told by the liar in chief #MarkCarney...

If Carney possesses documentary evidence proving Trump suddenly dumped outrageous, unacceptable demands onto Canada at the eleventh hour, where the hell is it?

Seriously.

Think about what that evidence would be worth politically.

IF Carney had a piece of paper proving Donald Trump screwed Canada, blindsided our negotiators and forced our heroic prime minister to stand up, pound the table and walk away, the Liberal machine wouldn’t quietly tuck that document into a filing cabinet.

Are you kidding me?

▪︎ They’d wallpaper Ottawa with the damn thing.

▪︎ They’d hold press conferences about it.

▪︎ They’d wave it around in Parliament.

▪︎ They’d quote it in fundraising emails.

▪︎ They’d buy ads with it.

Every friendly pundit in the country would have a laminated copy by breakfast. CBC would probably commission a twelve-part documentary and an interpretive dance.

It would be political rocket fuel.
Carney could point directly at the evidence and say, See? I stood up to Trump.

And considering how desperately this government wants Canadians angry at Trump, they would squeeze every last political drop out of it.

Instead, we get:

- Words.
- Trust us.
- Trump did it.
- Don't worry about the details.
- Just keep your elbows up and direct your anger toward the orange man south of the border.

How extraordinarily convenient.

And while Canada spends years shrieking about foreign interference, demanding security clearances for opposition leaders and warning us about other countries trying to influence Canadian politics, Canadian politicians seem remarkably comfortable inserting themselves into American partisan politics.

Apparently foreign political influence is a mortal threat to democracy when it crosses the border heading north.

Heading south?
Nothing to see here, carry on.
So enough of the carefully packaged Liberal bullshit.

Release the negotiating documents.

• Show Canadians the American demands.
• Show us Canada's demands.
• Show us what changed.
• Show us when it changed.
• Show us exactly what was sitting on that table when Canada walked away.

Because if those documents prove Carney's story, his government has every political incentive imaginable to release them, and its quite odd that they haven't.

Their continued absence doesn't prove he's lying, but it sure does suggest it!

And considering the Americans are providing details while our own government feeds us verbal oatmeal, it sure as hell gives Canadians a reason to stop swallowing everything we're spoon-fed.

Mark Carney isn't an oracle. He isn't our father. And Canadians aren't intellectually deficient children who need the PMO to decide which facts we're mature enough to see.

Stop telling us whom to hate.
Show us what happened.
Then we'll decide for ourselves who is full of shit.

#cdnpoli

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@DataRepublican They can be distinguished from one another as different waypoints along their "progressive" path. The goal posts always move yet here they're presented as static positions.

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@GavinGewecke ☕️

[Aaron Gunn @AaronGunn]

I always thought the role of media was to hold the powerful accountable and to unapologetically seek the truth.

Apparently, the CBC views it as trying to deceive and trick individual citizens (and opposition Members of Parliament) into bizarre and intentional “traps”.

It’s something you would expect from a university fraternity, not a taxpayer-funded broadcaster.

I want answers. Why is the taxpayer-funded broadcaster contacting Canadians and a Member of Parliament in disguise and trying to trick us into participating in a twisted social experiment, in partnership with American leftists like Igor Vamos?

Will taxpayers also need to cover the legal bills for CBC in the inevitable lawsuits they are about to face?

I interviewed more than 300 Canadians for my documentaries (and didn't receive any taxpayer money).

Not once did I engage in garbage like this.

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@PeterRowe184 @rationalaussie After +40 years in the trade there is no doubt Rowie is correct. I've seen some of these "brilliant" apprentices that never put together more than Ikea furniture. Very few actually willing to do the work.

[Cosmin Dzsurdzsa @cosminDZS]

A large swathe of Canadians are under a spell and that spell is a reality-bending filter woven for them by the establishment media.

Every good Canadian imagines they are forming independent, well-informed opinions about politics and the world, but in truth their conclusions are all based on a fictional version of Canada crafted by the media, downstream from Liberal government directives.

Once in a while, this spell gets shattered (think Katie Telford admitting she could line up op-eds to justify political interference during SNC-Lavalin). But most of the time, it persists and it is utterly destructive.

The result is a population reacting to a Canada that simply doesn’t exist, at least in any real sense.

The reality filter the CBC and the media monopoloy have sold them is not merely incomplete it's actively at war with observable reality.

Like living inside a continent-sized Potemkin Village, Canadians see themselves confronting threats that are largely fabricated.

Outside observers, other countries, do not share this imaginary Canada. In fact, nobody other than Canadians themselves views Canada in such a preposterous and utterly fabricated way.

This mismatch between the model of Canada and reality warps everything they do. That is to say, the Canadian mental model, big picture, common narrative, worldview, mythos, whatever you want to call it, is so far detached from reality that it causes them to consistently err and make poor choices, even choices that harm them.

[Goldie Ghamari | گلسا قمری 🇮🇷 @gghamari]

An Iranian man is casually smoking a hookah while standing on his rooftop watching the United States and Israel destroy IRGC facilities in the city of Karaj.

This is peak Iranian. All he's missing are the sunflower seeds.

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@BrianRoemmele Future creative content?

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@BrianRoemmele https://t.co/gglsHrvs3r

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@AntonioTweets2 Well Marc we are parsing out the fact that you wish to be unaccountable, to be in effect the "Kings" at your discretion nobody wants. Artic Mexico indeed.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

"Grass-fed beef requires more land!"

Correct. It requires land. Actual ecosystems.

Your monoculture crops require converting ecosystems into biological deserts.

Plough permanent grassland. Kill the microbes. Kill the fungi. Kill the worms. Kill the arthropods.

Then spray what survived the ploughing.

British grassland supports 250+ bird species, 1,500+ invertebrates, small mammals, amphibians.

Your quinoa field supports quinoa.

But somehow beef is the environmental villain.

[SAVE BEEF 🇺🇸 BeefMaps.com @BeefMaps]

🚨MONSANTO LIED. PEOPLE DIED. NOW THEY WANT IMMUNITY.

The Supreme Court will decide FRIDAY whether to hear Bayer/Monsanto’s Roundup cancer case.

THE FIGHT IS NOT OVER! SHARE THIS NOW!

If they take it — and Bayer wins — pesticide manufacturers could get permanent immunity, even when their products cause cancer and their approvals were based on fraud.

Here’s the play:

- Bayer says the EPA didn’t require a cancer warning
- So they shouldn’t be liable for not including one
- Even though Roundup’s EPA approval was based on a ghostwritten, retracted study
- Even though Roundup causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
- And even though thousands were never warned

This case isn’t just about Roundup.

If SCOTUS grants review and rules in Bayer’s favor, it could set a precedent shielding over 57,000 pesticide products—and every future pesticide—from liability.

That means:

→ As long as a company “follows the label,” they’re immune.
→ Even if the label was based on fraud, manipulation, or ghostwritten junk science.

57,000+ pesticides. Zero accountability.

This isn’t just regulatory capture.

It’s a blueprint for legal immunity built on deception.

📣 SCOTUS must DENY REVIEW.
📢 We’ve got 48 hours to flood the zone.

Tag everyone. Share the retracted study.

Let DC know:

NO IMMUNITY FOR POISON.
NO JUSTICE FOR FRAUD.

@amtoxicology @RobSchneider

[Hedgeye @Hedgeye]

🚨 TODAY 11:00am ET

A familiar face is BACK.

Hedgeye CEO @KeithMcCullough sits down with hedge fund veteran & fan favorite Mike Taylor @Mike_Taylor1972 for a no-holds-barred Crystal Ball on 2026 markets.

Access (FREE) here https://t.co/q0eRvCpgyu

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@grok @mr_merm @SamaHoole @Solar_Sas Grok, please separate out the poultry and pigs from this calculation leaving only ruminant animals...

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@SamaHoole Personally confirmed correct. 🎯

[H. Tuttle @HTuttle14]

@BottomLineFBN @dagenmcdowell @marcuslemonis Read chapter 20 of Dune Messiah by Frank Herbert. written approx. 1969