India has violated the ceasefire mere hours after it was agreed upon, targeting Pakistani positions and endangering civilians. Such breaches undermine peace efforts and escalate tensions dangerously. Pakistan will defend its sovereignty at all costs. #IndiaPakistanWar2025
Some pressing questions that must be answered:
1. How did Indian missiles, fired from hundreds of kilometers away, manage to hit targeted religious seminaries with "100% accuracy"?
2. Why did Pakistan’s multi-billion-dollar anti-missile defense system fail to intercept even a single missile?
3. If this was an airstrike, how did the air defense system remain inactive, especially when during the Balakot incident, Indian aircraft were intercepted immediately?
4. How did India carry out such brazen attacks on multiple Pakistani cities with such confidence? Was it assured at an international level that Pakistan would not retaliate?
5. The U.S. Vice President had stated that India should carry out a controlled operation and Pakistan should cooperate. Was India's specific targeting of seminaries linked to designated organizations, while Pakistan silently watched, an implementation of that directive?
6. Pakistan had evacuated seminaries belonging to specific religious groups, including in Azad Kashmir. Did they have prior knowledge of the nature of the attack? If so, did that information come from India?
7. Ata Tarar made a bizarre speech in Parliament yesterday, saying, "Let’s move forward together—this is not the time for internal conflict." Such a sudden shift from someone like Tarar suggests that the government was forewarned about the attack. If so, why wasn’t there any preparedness?
8. India repeatedly issued threats of military action. Why didn’t Pakistan formulate a plan of action to ensure an immediate and strong response in case of an attack?
9. India was initially expected to act within 72 hours, but instead chose to strike nearly 12–13 days later, just two days before May 9—when widespread protests were planned against the imposed regime in Pakistan. Why that timing?
10. Trump stated that the Indian action was anticipated and expressed hope that the matter would be resolved soon. Was this a mutually coordinated plan between two unpopular regimes, facilitated by a third power, where both sides could gain popularity through limited military action?
11. Despite such a large-scale attack on Pakistan, why have Maryam Nawaz and Shahbaz Sharif not tweeted a single statement against Modi? Has the Sharif family staged this joint show based on their personal relations with India—one that benefits both regimes?
#IndiaPakistan
The most dangerous modern health issues aren't:
Obesity. Addiction. Depression. Anxiety.
This one condition is the worst. And it causes the three above.
Here it is (and how to reverse it): 🧵
Somatic Psychology is the best way to rewire your brain from toxic habits, heal old trauma, and restore your nervous system to optimal health.
Here's everything you need to know about it: 🧵
The International Criminal Tribunal (ICT) mechanism is distinct from the International Criminal Court (ICC) and has specific applications. Here’s an analysis of whether an individual can seek justice for crimes committed by the Pakistani military in Islamabad through an ICT or a similar tribunal:
1. What is an ICT?
•ICTs are ad hoc tribunals established by the United Nations or the international community to address grave crimes like genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
•Examples:
•ICTY: For the former Yugoslavia.
•ICTR: For Rwanda.
These tribunals are temporary and are created to address specific conflicts or events.
2. Can an ICT be established for Pakistan?
To create an ICT to investigate Pakistani military actions in Islamabad, certain conditions must be met:
a) UN Security Council (UNSC) Action
•ICTs are typically established through UNSC resolutions. This requires the support of major powers like the US, UK, France, China, and Russia (any of which can veto such a resolution).
•Given Pakistan’s geopolitical alliances (e.g., China and some Gulf states), gaining UNSC approval is unlikely unless significant international pressure is applied.
b) International Legal Precedents
•The alleged crimes (e.g., the Islamabad massacre) must fit the definitions of war crimes or crimes against humanity.
•Crimes against humanity: Requires evidence of a widespread or systematic attack on civilians as part of state policy.
•War crimes: Requires that the acts occur during armed conflict (which might not apply to the Islamabad incident unless it can be framed as part of an internal conflict).
•A robust body of evidence must show deliberate and systematic targeting of civilians by the Pakistani military.
3. Can Individuals File Cases with ICTs?
���No direct filing by individuals: Similar to the ICC, ICTs do not allow individuals to file cases. However:
•Victims and witnesses can submit evidence or testify.
•Advocacy groups or states can lobby for the creation of a tribunal to investigate specific incidents.
4. Alternative Pathways to Establish Accountability
If an ICT for Pakistan is unlikely, here are other options:
a) Advocacy for Universal Jurisdiction
•Some countries (e.g., Belgium, Spain) have universal jurisdiction laws that allow their courts to prosecute crimes like genocide or crimes against humanity, regardless of where they were committed.
•Victims or advocacy groups could file cases in such jurisdictions against individual Pakistani military officials.
b) UN Human Rights Mechanisms
•Victims or groups can push for a UN Commission of Inquiry or Fact-Finding Mission to investigate and document abuses. This could pave the way for future tribunals or accountability mechanisms.
c) Regional Pressure
•Lobbying organizations like the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) or regional human rights bodies to condemn the acts and advocate for justice.
5. Challenges
•Political Obstacles: Pakistan’s international alliances and UNSC dynamics make it hard to establish an ICT.
•Proof and Documentation: Strong evidence of systematic and deliberate targeting of civilians is crucial.
•International Awareness: Building a global consensus on the need for accountability is critical.
Conclusion
While an ICT specifically for Pakistan is theoretically possible, it is highly unlikely without overwhelming international pressure and solid evidence of crimes qualifying as war crimes or crimes against humanity. Alternatives like universal jurisdiction, UN investigations, or international advocacy may offer more immediate paths to justice.
#IslamabadMassacre
Remember those stories of Baloch that
“Pakistan Army throws them down from helicopters, buries them in mass graves after torturing and sodomising them”
Now you have evidence.
@KhSaad_Rafique اللہ سے دعا ہے کے تمہاری نسلیں اس فسطیف کا خمیازہ بھگتیں ۔ تم لوگ ایسی جگہ مرو جہاں موت بھی مشکل ہو جاے۔تم تڑپو موت کے لیے نا آخرت میں سکون ملی نا دنیا میں موت آئے ۔
@PTIofficial We do not need to read what we already know so just fuckin get out of the house and be a leader you assholes ! Get out with public now let the public lead you you fuckin failed so called leaders!!!