This might be the greatest issue report in history
Some folks wrote a paper about my /retro skill assessing its effectiveness
Incredible
https://t.co/IYo4rhz1Vp
Introducing Claude Duet for Video Editing
Just describe the edit and Pause edits the ENTIRE video in one shot
-> Editors
-> Youtubers
-> Streamers
Stop manually editing like its 2018
We launched OSS Scanner, which gives critical open source projects free, periodic vulnerability scans from our strongest models.
Each finding includes a proof-of-concept, and a patch where possible.
https://t.co/aonfpNG3WO
We plugged Google Research’s Harness² into JEV 1.14.
Zero weights touched, yet driving massive gains on vision benchmarks round after round.
Under the hood, the system:
⚡️ Rewrites its own prompts
🛠️ Builds its own tools
🧠 Distills its own experience
JEV-Harness² repo drops soon. Stay tuned.
Claude writes about 90% of Claude Code's code.
From June to September, merged PRs more than doubled while the share reverted fell by more than 40%.
We wrote about how we changed code review to get there, and how to adopt it:
https://t.co/9sZe64g3mb
One 6-hour run. One hackbot. 4 confirmed criticals. 17 confirmed highs.
@jhaddix breaks down how Arcanum built Armada - their in-house hackbot running on Claude Code - and every failure it took to get there.
Full talk is up. https://t.co/scUwBKQklJ
Official Anthropic tip for Claude Code: don't exhaust Opus 5.5 context on repetitive multi-file routines when Sonnet 5.5 can swarm them in parallel and Fable 5.1 can verify the result
turn mass-agent sweeps into deterministic code with dynamic workflows
claude --effort ultracode /workflows
Opus 5.5 acts as the lead architect, drafting the workflow script, setting input schemas, and synthesizing final verified reports
Sonnet 5.5 workers swarm the execution pipeline across dozens of files, handling bulk refactors and migrations at medium effort
Fable 5.1 stands by as the dedicated verifier, entering the pipeline at three decisive moments:
→ before a fan-out: does this workload justify a 50-agent script or can a tight 5-step pipeline solve it?
→ on worker failure: can the step replay from cache or does the pipeline branch need a clean rerun?
→ before reporting: did every reported finding survive adversarial cross-checking and voting?
Sonnet 5.5 executes. Fable 5.1 cross-examines. Opus 5.5 authors and reports
Jev engineering runs the identical pattern one layer down: mechanical choices that need no cognitive reasoning (which file to inspect, which tool to invoke, retry or stop) resolve in 16ms, so frontier models only wake up when execution paths actually split
Plan on high. Delegate on medium. Keep Fable on call.
- the full workflow architecture
> Opus 5.5 on high drafts the orchestration script inside .claude/workflows/
> pipeline() fans out Sonnet 5.5 workers across target paths concurrently
> each worker operates inside an isolated working copy to eliminate file collisions
> Fable 5.1 cross-checks claims and votes down unverified findings
> intermediate state lives in script variables, leaving Claude's context 100% clean
> 1h prompt cache prefix hold eliminates redundant system prompt processing
paste the setup and this prompt into Claude Code below:
"Configure my Claude Code workspace for dynamic workflows:
1. Audit ~/.claude/workflows and .claude/workflows for existing scripts:
> Draft workflow definitions for codebase audits, parallel migrations, and adversarial verification
> Pin model: sonnet, effort: medium for pipeline workers, and model: fable for verifier agents
> Configure workers to operate on isolated copies to eliminate edit conflicts
2. In ~/.claude/settings.json, enable dynamic workflows:
> Set ultracode = true
> Lock main session effortLevel to high
> Set subagentPromptCacheTtl = '1h' to share prompt prefixes across parallel fan-outs
3. Set workflow runtime controls:
> Set autoContinueAtUsageLimit = true so long batch runs automatically resume after limit resets
> Set CLAUDE_CODE_WORKFLOW_PREFIX_STAGGER_MS = 5000 for prompt prefix caching
> Set large workflow warning threshold to 25 agents
4. Add a rule to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: all multi-file audits must pass an adversarial Fable cross-check before findings are reported to the lead session
Show every configuration diff first. Do not apply edits until confirmed"
↳ https://t.co/PcTdH7e68J
Absolutely recommend using Cache Control in Claude Code
Probably one of the Mods that will save you the most tokens and help keep your sessions going much longer
It adds this bar for Claude’s 5 minute cache and sends notifications to help keep the cache warm
Install command:
npx claude-code-templates@latest --mod observability/prompt-cache-control
We're adding a new plugin to Claude Code: You should Know.
It scans Claude's output for important information you might miss to help keep you in the loop.
Enable it with:
/plugin enable cc-plugin-you-should-know@builtin
Matt Pocock (TypeScript wizard, ex-Vercel):
"Opus 5 got addicted to writing tests that just repeat the code back to itself."
in a 22-min talk at AI Engineer Paris, Matt walks through how to stop AI PRs from turning your repo into a slop cannon:
5:30 → the tests AI writes that pass forever and catch nothing
8:31 → deep modules: how codebase design makes those tests impossible
11:41 → why coding standards belong in a separate review agent, not your implementer
15:34 → your AI reviewer shouldn't comment. it should commit the fixes
17:20 → one-way vs two-way doors: which PRs a human actually needs to review
20:38 → retro skill: turn every review comment into a check so you never write it twice
how to build agents that learn by watching you work – pinned article↓
Jev is the "Internet" moment for the AI industry
It tells your agents and LLMs what to do next, in milliseconds and at almost zero cost
If you set it up correctly, you will have the AI engineer’s stack for 2028
In this article, I show you how https://t.co/x3qn41ejnr
Full Jev Tutorial
What it is, how you can build with it and what new applications it can unlock
→ 0:00 Intro
→ 0:34 Jev explained
→ 4:06 API setup
→ 5:59 Demo 1: Voice-controlled browser
→ 11:33 Demo 2: AI memory
→ 17:27 Demo 3: YouTube predictor
i burned through my entire GPT-6 Astra weekly quota in 3 days
so i'm replacing my $200/mo Codex subscription with this...
a free 32,960-star GitHub repo that runs GLM-5.3 Flash, Kimi K3, and DeepSeek V4 Flash locally
[here's the exact setup i used:]
1. get colibri
download the release archive for Linux, macOS, or Windows. no compiler needed.
python3 coli info
2. or build it from source
git clone https://t.co/nGh4QY3h7W
cd colibri/c
./setup.sh
cd ..
3. pick a model
GLM-5.3 Flash: 321B, ~195 GB converted, 25 GB RAM
DeepSeek V4 Flash: 284B, ~167 GB, or ~85 GB for the REAP 150B version
Kimi K3: 2.8T, ~1.6 TB snapshot, 32 GB+ RAM
none of them needs a GPU. a GPU only makes some runs faster.
4. get the weights
GLM-5.3 Flash uses the dedicated converter:
python3 tools/convert_glm53.py --outdir /nvme/glm53_i4 --min-free-gb 30
DeepSeek V4 Flash and Kimi K3 load from their original Hugging Face snapshots. pre-converted containers work too.
5. run it
COLI_MODEL=/nvme/glm53_i4 ./coli chat
./coli web --model /nvme/glm53_i4 # dashboard
./coli serve --model /nvme/glm53_i4 # headless API
6. tune it
./coli doctor # readiness check
./coli plan # RAM/VRAM/disk placement
./coli tune # fastest safe profile
`coli` reads `config.json` and picks the right engine for each model.
the tradeoff is honest: no token bill, no hosted quota... but you need the storage.
the frontier moved from your subscription to your SSD.
Claude just got a red-team playbook.
Claude-Red just dropped a full pentest skill pack for Claude :
- 78 SKILL.md files.
- 23 categories.
- Load on demand unused skills don’t burn context.
Web, AD, cloud, containers, CI/CD, wireless, EDR evasion, exploit-dev.
Use it for authorized red team, bounty in scope, research, CTF.