Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

أقدم عينات السلالة G حسب دراسات لرفات أثرية بين الأعوام 10800-6500 سنة ق.م
https://t.co/4vcDgAjHz7

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@tmooofi Please run
samtools coverage https://t.co/lMZXRhc8GO

chromosome meandepth
X 0.00158692
Y 0.000690425

Is sample A55056 even male?

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@KhaleelAlq79154 من المرجح أن يكون الشخص المصري الموجود في هذا الفرع من دراسة هابر (2017) التي أجريت في تشاد شخصًا مصريًا معاصرًا، وليس شخصًا من العصور القديمة.
هذا خطأ تمامًا.

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@KhaleelAlq79154 معلومات خاطئة! غير دقيقة وغير موثقة.
تجاهل هذا.

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@sapphiregnm @nrken19 The link to the 24x high-coverage hg19 BAM file for Denisova 25, a 200,000 year-old male Denisovan from Denisova Cave in Siberia, with a high coverage Denisovan Y chromosome for the first time.

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

The high coverage genome BAM file is now available for Denisova 25, a male Denisovan with 24x coverage:
https://t.co/TSSvdn9SFS

@nrken19

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@alwakeel1983 باغراتيوني جورجيا هي Q-FT284461، وليس G.

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@alwakeel1983 عند تصنيفَي STR (23 و20)، وفقًا لـ FTDNA، جميعُ تطابقات STR الخاصة به هي G-S11415 (G-S9591 في YFull):
https://t.co/wYnP8N9sGY
https://t.co/xC6ZxDCQxQ

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@Akkadian_V12 Thank you, you should edit or delete your tweet in that case, to avoid confusion.

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@GildosAssuros @nrken19 These are not based on @MiroCyo coordinates, but on those from @alwakeel1983 which he deleted:
https://t.co/Cceh8UTceF

[Miro C @MiroCyo]

@alwakeel1983 You are way off Alwakeel

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@KamalMu44550913 @MiroCyo Not true at all. In many Jewish populations, haplogroup G is the 2nd or 3rd most common Y haplogroup.

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@MiroCyo https://t.co/Cceh8UTceF

[Miro C @MiroCyo]

@alwakeel1983 You are way off Alwakeel

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@MiroCyo @MiroCyo
Can you post the Global25 values for this sample?

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@ARAMBNSAM

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@OriginsUnveiled These include not only Harbin in Homo longi, but also
These include:

Maba
Penghu (confirmed Densiovan)
Denisova (Denisova 3 molar, defined "Denisovan")
Xujiayao
Jinniushan
Xiahe (confirmed Denisovan)
Hualongdong (HLD 6)
Harbin (confirmed Denisovan)
Yunxian
Dali

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@OriginsUnveiled The soon to be published Feng et al. preprint classifies all the existing Denisovan samples and others in a "Longi clade". This would formally include all these specimens in "Homo longi":

https://t.co/Yt72lleZoP

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@OriginsUnveiled According to article 23.9.3, an older synonym or homonym can be suppressed in favor of a newer one. So a researcher would have to formally propose a new binomial name, with a holotype.
This hasn't been done (yet).

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@OriginsUnveiled According to the conditions of ICZN Article 23.9, the two conditions for any name besides Homo longi have not been met, so there cannot be an reversal of precedence.

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@OriginsUnveiled 23.9.1.2. the junior synonym or homonym has been used for a particular taxon, as its presumed valid name, in at least 25 works, published by at least 10 authors in the immediately preceding 50 years and encompassing a span of not less than 10 years.

[Ted Kandell Y: G-Y53746 mtDNA: HV5a A3397G @Haplogroup_G]

@OriginsUnveiled 23.9.1.1. the senior synonym or homonym has not been used as a valid name after 1899, and