Dawn

Hungry for the truth. Sick of the bullshit.

[Dawn @HappyPupMomma]

@1_and_only_Wade @Napyhed2 😂😂😂😂😂😂🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶 Tell them everything, Bobby!

[Sir Thomas A. Wade 😂 @1_and_only_Wade]

“You’re about to get cooked again Jen!” 😎

[Thrilla the Gorilla @ThrillaRilla369]

If arresting Epstein’s pedos will collapse world governments, then world governments need to collapse.

[Bobby Sauce @takenaps]

Another one of my Karen Read trial bangers, in preparation for the new @netflix documentary

[Dixie Normus @DixieNormu95224]

Kim Fair said she’s screenshotting every one of my posts, so Kim, screenshot this one nice and clear.
I’ve been saying this all along, Allie, Colin, and Higgins are not three separate stories. Their timelines overlap.

If Higgins’ Jeep was where they say it was, Allie should have seen it when she pulled in. Allie Could not tell MSP how Colin was at Fairview ummm well.... colin told us in court Allie drove him!!!!! Higgins should have seen Allie arrive. Colin should have seen Higgins’ Jeep when he came out. This was not some complicated maze. There are only so many ways to get to 34 Fairview.
Yet Allie could not clearly remember the route she took to pick Colin up, and now the filing says Life360 data from Jennifer McCabe’s phone showed Allie did not travel straight home after dropping Colin off and even more importantly, showed no evidence of Allie arriving at or departing from 34 Fairview or Colin’s house on January 29.

So once again, the “simple explanation” is not simple at all.
If Colin left the house exactly how they said he did, why does the data make the story messier instead of clearer?
If Allie picked him up at 34 Fairview, why does the record not cleanly show that?
If Higgins’ Jeep was there, why does nobody’s testimony cleanly account for who saw who?
A normal pickup does not need this much explaining.

Screenshot that.

[Matt @Yette1]

@GrantSmithEllis Unfortunately not a single State Trooper has been taken into custody yet

[Dawn @HappyPupMomma]

@TrueGrit10 @ThePatriotTea @nicksortor Trump and Obama are one in the same. We all need to wake up and realize it’s all a bunch of shit. It’s us against them. Do your research.

[Cody Eastmont @CodyEastmont]

@nicksortor @Beardvet Bestie is stuck on the tarmac at Tucson and sent this live shot of fighters being scrambled. Something isn't right

[Janaya @Janayabee]

@DoctorTurtleboy

Christina Rex went to Morriseys office and HOUSE to ask questions. Just wanted to let you know in case it helps your argument.
CBS Boston video
https://t.co/G7ltA2fwbj

Free turtle boy. 🐢Sending my support from Tasmania, Australia home of Neil the Seal 🦭

[Lara @TheChauffeurX]

It’s disgraceful that Michael Morrissey continues to target and prosecute journalist Aidan Kearney for exposing the corruption of Michael Proctor, John Fanning, and Brian Tully. This is retribution for daring to challenge the establishment.

“Why are we protecting him [Proctor].”

[James Sullivan @realjustsully]

“You’re leaving”?

“Ya, we’re heading over to the Waterfall, you should come”.

I wish I took him up on that offer.

Let me make this clear to anyone I used to know….I will leave no stone unturned to try and find out what happened to John O’Keefe.

He deserves JUSTICE.

[BoozeyBeauty @BoozeyBeauty]

Brian Holmes testified in the US vs Matthew Farwell trial (Sandra Birchmore case) and here he is confirming what many of us have thought: that it would not be a surprise if more individuals were indicted from Stoughton.

Holmes was the deputy chief at Stoughton and completed the 2021 internal affairs investigation that had both Farwell twins and Robert Devine resigning from their positions at the department. He worked on it for 19 months before bringing it to Norfolk County District Attorney Michael Morrissey. Morrissey refused to open an investigative grand jury. So Holmes decided to go above him and report the findings to the FBI.

He was also present when chief McNamara started a second IA investigation regarding the January 20th, 2021 phone call to SPD. Sandra Birchmore's friend called the department which set the scene for her murder - occurring only 12 days later. Holmes didn't leave the department until December 2024 so he is very aware of what was going on in this second investigation.

McNamara, in a lawsuit she filed over the summer against town administrator (and long time buddy of Morrissey) Thomas Calter, claims Calter called the second IA report a "hit piece," repeatedly ordered her to destroy it, and retaliated against her when she refused. McNamara states that she refused Calter's orders because destroying an official investigative record would violate department rules, public records laws, and police standards. She kept the report intact and continued cooperating with the FBI and Department of Justice.

Not only that, she alleges Calter retaliated against her for refusing to destroy the 2024 report and for warning him in June 2026 that she might open additional internal probes as trial testimony unfolded. Weeks after that warning, she claims Calter used an unrelated personnel dispute as a pretext to demand she resign or be terminated, leading to her suspension on paid administrative leave.

Essentially, Morrissey's pal is attempting to block further investigations and punishments of bad cops in town. I've said for some time that the "Stoughton boys" are oddly protected. But, I think soon enough we will see that shield be brought down and finally understand what really has been going on. To be continued...

[TinyElvis @TinyElvisx]

The Alberts and McCabes have spent the last 4 years insisting that everyone else needs to stop talking about them. You don't get to demand that the public stop asking questions while simultaneously making yourselves recurring characters in a true-crime franchise. That's like showing up at your own press conference and demanding privacy.

[Boston Tom @BostonTom23]

@netflix @SandpaperFilms Does your new #KarenRead documentary discuss at all how Kate Peter, one of the people covered in the docuseries, was collaborating with the District Attorney's Office and openly posted racial comments directed at a juror?

[Dawn @HappyPupMomma]

@Evolved6_ It’s funny how Karen allegedly saying I hit him makes her a killer, but the two a-hole “stand up” cops who are really allegedly responsible deep six their phones to, you know, upgrade are innocent. How do you back this idiotic bullshit?!

[Dawn @HappyPupMomma]

@xMiss_B If you watched even one segment of anyone’s YouTube show about this case, you won’t be able to stop following it. It is truly insane.

[Bobby Sauce @takenaps]

Which Story is More Believable?

If you don't think the Karen Read trial is a cover-up, you must be Angela Lansbury.

Two-dozen buttdials and a story straight from a Nancy Drew mystery. Temu Heisenberg and the gang of questionable Cantonians wove a tale so intricate only Sherlock Holmes and the Hardly Boys could crack.

Maybe the Lexus SUV has a mouth of dog teeth? Anything is possible if you have slop for brains. #karenread #FreeKarenRead @FreeKarenRead @Free_Karen_Read

[Boston Brandi @BostonBrandi100]

Veterans should always come BEFORE agendas but some people just dont get it. Or respect it. 😔 🇺🇸

[Eric Digirolamo @EricDigirolamo]

Whitey’s back! 🔥 🔥 🔥

[BoozeyBeauty @BoozeyBeauty]

Jennifer McCabe sat for at least two separate interviews for the soon-to-be released Netflix special. Production may have interviewed McCabe initially and brought her back to address additional questions, developments, or subjects that arose during editing.

This means that anyone who is in active litigation with McCabe will have likely hours of footage to sort through via discovery.

This also opens up discovery obligations for McCabe herself. Because she is a party in the defamation litigation, opposing counsel can seek relevant, nonprivileged materials within the scope of Rule 26(b).

On Netflix's end, they could object based on burden, relevance, confidentiality, or protections for newsgathering materials. Massachusetts does not have a comprehensive statutory reporter shield law, although a qualified common-law privilege may be asserted. This is something McCabe would know all about as Karen Read and other media organizations were subject to similar issues with Read's interviews.

Another potential issue is that Netflix says the documentary has been in production for several years. That means the interviews could have occurred at very different stages of the criminal and civil proceedings. For example:
🔹An interview conducted before the first criminal trial would be particularly interesting to compare against subsequent trial testimony.
🔹An interview conducted after the second trial could contain statements made with full knowledge of how the evidence was presented and challenged.
🔹An interview conducted after the civil lawsuits began could raise additional questions about whether McCabe discussed subjects directly related to her pending claims and defenses.

All of which would be expected to be cross-referenced to her statements to police and during the two criminal trials.