And yet people continue to claim that the Wahhabi movement is not run by intelligence agencies.
Wahhabism is NOT HANBALISM OR AQIDA OF SALAF.
IT IS THE POLITICAL MANIPULATION OF HANBALISM AND THE SALAFI AQIDA BY INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES TO ADVANCE US-SAUDI-ISRAELI INTERESTS.
Today's Wahhabis tell you that to understand them, you must study the Quran, hadith, and the opinions of the Salaf.
This is how they deceive you.
If you want to understand contemporary Wahhabism, you must begin by looking at the secret British and American records on Ibn Saud - the founder of the third Saudi state.
Contemporary Wahhabi doctrine, at the deepest level, has been designed to legitimate the policies of the third Saudi state.
I challenge any Wahhabi to debate me on this matter.
Wahhabis
Your evil atrocities continue to blacken the name of all Muslims.
You keep pretending to represent Muslims but you have nothing to do with us.
Real Muslims build missiles, drones, and nukes to directly confront the oppressors of Muslims.
Wahhabis simply take small arms and explosives, and then use them to engage in arbitrary attacks on churches, mosques, and marketplaces.
And these attacks accomplish no political or military purpose whatsoever.
Traditional Sunnis do NOT do this.
Sufis do NOT do this.
Ikhwanis do NOT do this.
Shia do NOT do this.
IT IS ONLY ONE FILTHY GROUP THAT DOES THIS OVER AND OVER AGAIN.
WHENEVER WE READ ABOUT A CHURCH SHOOTING WE KNOW IMMEDIATELY IT IS THEM.
IT IS THE WAHHABI ANIMALS!
The ISIS group that did this closely follows the deviant teachings of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab.
In fact, ISIS explicitly emphasizes that they follow these teachings more closely than anyone else.
When will we hold online preachers to account for spreading these filthy teachings?
Till this day, Wahhabi spokesmen like Farid al-Bahraini and Adnan Rashid preach these Wahhabi teachings online.
Both of these evil men should be ashamed of themselves.
TO BE CLEAR, I AM NOT CLAIMING THAT THESE WAHHABI PREACHERS DIRECTLY PARTICIPATED IN THE ATTACKS.
But they preach the underlying teachings, and will not stop preaching them no matter how many times Muslims tell them to cease.
Muslims have an obligation to prevent this type of evil violence being done in our name.
And this will not happen except by aggressively confronting the Wahhabi movement and eliminating it from our communities.
BRITISH COLONIAL OFFICERS DESCRIBE HOW IBN SAUD SOLD PALESTINE TO THE BRITISH
Abd al-Aziz Ibn Saud is the founder of the modern day state of Saudi Arabia.
Up until the present, all the Saudi kings have been his sons (i.e., up until King Salman).
Ibn Saud built his state by annexing Ottoman territories with the aid of the British.
This required agreeing to Britain's transfer of Ottoman Palestine to the Jews for the purpose of establishing the state of Israel.
Lieutenant Colonel Harold Richard Patrick Dickson (4 February 1881 – 14 June 1959) was a British colonial administrator in the Middle East from the 1920s until the 1940s.
He describes key events from Ibn Saud's life in his book Kuwait and her Neighbors (London: Geroge Allen and Unwin, 1956).
In one famous passage, Dickson describes the colonial officer Percy Cox drawing up the borders of various Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia and the Gulf. Ibn Saud begs Cox for more land, but insists that since Cox has created him and his kingdom from nothing, he will do whatever Cox demands.
Dickson says:
On the sixth day Sir Percy entered the lists. He told both sides that, at the rate they were going, nothing would be settled for a year. At a private meeting at which only he, Ibn Sa’ud and I were present, he lost all patience over what he called the childish attitude of Ibn Sa’ud in his tribal-boundary idea. Sir Percy’s Arabic was not too good, so I did the translating. It was astonishing to see the Sultan of Najd being reprimanded like a naughty schoolboy by H.M. High Commissioner, and being told sharply that he, Sir Percy Cox, would himself decide on the type and general line of the frontier. This ended the impasse. Ibn Sa’ud almost broke down, and pathetically remarked that Sir Percy was his father and mother, who had made him and raised him from nothing to the position he held, and that he would surrender half his kingdom, nay the whole, if Sir Percy ordered.
p. 274 Dickson, Kuwait and her Neighbors (London: Geroge Allen and Unwin, 1956).
Later on Dickson speaks of Ibn Saud's stance on British decisions on who will get the land of Palestine. Prizing his relationship with the British over the Palestinians, Ibn Saud agrees to submit to British decisions no matter what happens to the Palestinians. In return, for him sacrificing the Palestinian cause, the British offer him gifts.
Dickson says:
My personal reactions to all I had seen and heard in Riyadh can be briefly summed up.
While the people of Sa’udi Arabia, and especially the religious leaders, were manifestly in great excitement over the Palestine question, the King was definitely in control and would keep his people in hand. Though himself indignant and distressed at the trend of policy in Palestine, particularly the scheme for partition, he was determined not to jeopardize the friendly relations existing between him and the British Government. Hence he would make no move at all of an anti-British nature in Arabia, beyond giving advice and offering suggestions.
Nevertheless his policy of remaining neutral was going to harm his prestige in Arabia, and he could see this. I felt that if the British Government could grant him some sort of quid pro quo for standing aloof in the present crisis—something that would be of immediate benefit to the Arabs of the Arabian peninsula proper, and that could be seen and appreciated by all his peoples—the British Government would be wise to grant him such. He would have his own way of explaining the gift to his subjects, and a less hostile atmosphere among the Arabs would, I felt, follow. Any quid pro quo would, however, have to err on the very generous side. Anything niggardly would spoil all.
p. 414 Dickson, Kuwait and her Neighbors (London: Geroge Allen and Unwin, 1956).