BINANCE CÓ VẤN ĐỀ CHUYỂN TIỀN, TAM TAI THẬT SỰ!
Hết hack 6 tỷ đô tới Elon Musk giờ tới hệ thống UID
Sự việc: Mội người dùng muốn chuyển tiền từ Binance Global sang Binance Thailand thay vì QR Code thì người dùng sử dụng UID với tổng số tiền là 11.398 $USDT.
Tuy nhiên, người này lại không nhận được tiền trên Binance Thailand mà tiền lại bị chảy vào một tài khoản khác.
Người dùng này sau đó đã tố Binance có hiện tượng UID trùng nhau và cho rằng Binance đang không hợp tác với cảnh sát để thu hồi tiền.
Với mô hình hoạt động của Binance thì hiện tại thì mình tạm hiểu như sau:
1️⃣ Các Binance Global, Binance Turkey, Binance US, Binance Thailand,... là các nền tảng độc lập, không dùng chung hệ thống tài khoản và UID với Binance chính.
2️⃣ UID của Binance Thailand và Binance Global có thể giống nhau nhưng thực chất là 2 tài khoản khác nhau do các nền tảng này là độc lập.
Ví dụ: Người A có UID là 123456 tại Binance Thailand.
Người A này có nhu cầu chuyển 20.000 $USDT từ Binance Global về Binance Thailand và quyết định sử dụng gửi thông qua UID.
Tiền được gửi đi nhưng người A không nhận được 20.000 $USDT tại tài khoản UID 123456 tại Binance Thailand.
Thực chất thì 20.000 $USDT vẫn tới tài khoản UID 123456 nhưng tới tài khoản của ai đó tại Binance Global.
Thực ra bản thân mình cũng hoàn toàn bất ngờ với câu chuyện này và nếu đóng vai là người dùng A trong này thì mình cũng sẽ làm điều tương tự với khi chuyển khoản Binance với Binance thì không cần sử dụng ví mà thường sử dụng UID cho nhanh, quét QR cũng phải tải ảnh về khá mất thời gian.
Yi He cũng chính thức lên tiếng với một số thông tin như:
1️⃣ Không có chuyện UID trùng số. Mỗi tài khoản Binance chỉ có một UID duy nhất, hoàn toàn độc lập.
2️⃣ Đây là lỗi người dùng nhập nhầm: chuyển liên sàn (sang Binance Thailand) phải dùng địa chỉ/QR, không được nhập UID của sàn chính.
-> Yi He âm thầm xác nhận có sự trùng lặp UID giữa các phiên bản Binance khác nhau là có thật.
Yi He tiếp tục khẳng định về việc sàn có bước xác nhận lần 2 nhưng người dùng không kiểm tra kỹ.
3️⃣ Phía Binance cũng đã có những hành động như:
- Ngay sau khi được liên hệ, Yi He cùng 4 nhân viên đã đóng băng số tiền ngay lập tức.
- Người nhận tiền không phải kẻ gian, chỉ là người dùng nhận nhầm và hiện không hoạt động, sàn đã liên hệ nhiều lần nhưng chưa có phản hồi.
Nguồn: https://t.co/reRCRmuPU2
Với mình thì vấn đề này nên thuộc về Binance chứ không phải người dùng khi mà mình sử dụng Binance bao năm nay nhưng chưa hề biết tới việc chuyển tiền liên Binance phải dùng QR Code chứ không được xài UID.
Lẽ ra Binance có thể đền bù + phần thưởng bù đắp cho người dùng phát hiện ra lỗi + tìm cách thu hồi tiền trong ví người dùng kia chứ không nên đổ lỗi ngược lại cho người dùng kể cả là xác nhận nhưng kia là xác nhận số UID có đúng hay không chứ không phải xác nhận gửi liên sàn Binance là không được sử dụng UID.
Lẽ ra trước đó Binance cần có một câu hỏi là bạn đang gửi tiền tới Binance Turkey, US, Thailand,...
I can’t stop thinking about this… before hackers stole $6.4 billion from Binance, they spent days rehearsing the attack in public. The test transactions on Ethereum were worth only a few dollars. Nobody stopped them.
Bloomberg reconstructed what happened. Once the code worked, the hackers launched the real attack across multiple blockchains.
Then I reached the detail that doesn’t feel real. Some of the compromised wallets kept receiving fresh funds from Binance while the hackers were draining them. The attackers emptied a wallet, Binance refilled it, and they emptied it again. For a period of time, the exchange was effectively feeding new money into its own robbery.
Binance co-founder Yi He was at home in Abu Dhabi. She reportedly discovered the breach while scrolling X before bed. Imagine opening Twitter and learning that billions of dollars are disappearing from your own exchange.
Within minutes, Binance assembled a 100 person crisis team. The FBI, the U.S. Secret Service and blockchain analysts around the world joined the response. Meanwhile, some employees were reportedly already worried about losing their annual bonuses.
But the most disturbing detail came later. According to the investigation, the hackers used valid permissions to execute the transfers. To the blockchain, everything looked authorized. There was no transaction labeled “hack” just legitimate-looking operations moving billions out of wallets the system still trusted.
The $6.4 billion heist didn’t begin when billions started moving. It began days earlier with transactions worth a few dollars, too small for anyone to care about.
By the time it looked dangerous, the blockchain was still saying: authorized.
So rumours are coming that ELON MUSK and some other insiders are going to invest in Hyperliquid $HYPE.
Trump may also announce something big related to Hyperliquid soon.
Hack is still ongoing guys.
167 ($13.3M) $WBTC 14 mins ago
21,851,879 ($8.3M) $ONDO 4m ago
9,707,546 ($9.7M) $USDe 1m ago
Follow here:
https://t.co/7Z42dLWHbN
$BTC: I’m now long with $36M USD
I continue to accumulate longs at the box, now is another great opportunity to add more! Bringing my average long entry to $80,400 and a position size of $36M USD
My wallet balance is currently around $1.3 million.
But one thing I have learned is that making money and keeping money are two different things.
I am more proud of the lessons I learned than the money I made.
I have come a long way, but I still have a long way to go.
Continuing my memecoin recap series, the second token I want to talk about today is solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM
I've actually been following the Claudia narrative for a while, ever since the character first appeared within the $Agency ecosystem
But what made me dig deeper this time wasn't necessarily the chart pumping. It was the story behind the token and how the original creator is now getting involved
In just a few days, solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM went from an extremely low market cap to several million dollars, briefly surpassing $9M according to the data I collected on October 11
What's interesting is that several factors are coming together here: an AI character that had already gone viral, Elon Musk interacting with the creator's content multiple times, creator fees, and publicly disclosed token purchases and locks
I think this is a pretty interesting case to research, although there are definitely some risks worth discussing
1. First, what exactly is Claudia?
Claudia is an AI character created by @anabology, a creator with a background in technology and biohacking rather than a traditional crypto KOL
He uses AI tools such as Claude, Midjourney, Seedance, and Suno to produce high-quality AI music videos
Some of his notable creations include Clodyssey, Escape Velocity, and Macrohard: Windows XP
What caught my attention is that Claudia isn't just a character appearing in a few viral videos
Anabology is trying to develop her into an open character that other creators can also use to produce their own content
The concept is somewhat similar to Hatsune Miku, but built around modern AI technology
This is also why I think the narrative is a little different from most AI memecoins
The character and content existed before the token, rather than someone launching a token first and then trying to manufacture a story around it
2. The connection to $Agency and why there are two Claudia tokens
This is probably where a lot of people get confused
Before the current solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM token appeared, the Agency ecosystem had already launched another Claudia token, with a contract beginning with H7TuvDxE
That token launched around October 3 as part of Agency's living token model
According to its design, it features an AI agent, its own treasury, buyback/burn mechanisms, and automated content production
Its ATH reached approximately $2.87M before dropping significantly, trading around $60–80K based on the October 10 snapshot
Meanwhile, the solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM I'm discussing today launched later, around October 6–7, through https://t.co/MDT1D8rHCr
The key difference is that this newer token received direct acknowledgment and participation from @anabology, the original creator of Claudia
Based on the information I've gathered, he confirmed the contract, started receiving creator fees, and publicly bought and locked tokens multiple times
So these two tokens essentially represent two different theses
Agency focuses on AI agents and automated infrastructure
The current solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM focuses on the original creator, content production, and the possibility of developing Claudia into a recognizable AI cultural character
Personally, I think the second narrative is easier for the memecoin community to understand
But that doesn't necessarily mean it has better technology or deserves a higher valuation
3. Who is @anabology, and why does he matter?
I spent some time looking into the creator's background
Based on the available snapshot, @anabology has approximately 83–84K followers on X
His work primarily revolves around AI content, biohacking, and technology. He's also associated with projects involving bioelectricity and at-home MRI
What's interesting is that his influence doesn't come from constantly promoting memecoins
It comes from producing AI videos that have attracted millions of views, including content that Elon Musk has interacted with directly on multiple occasions
To me, that's an important distinction
A crypto KOL might bring traders into a token for a short period, but a creator capable of consistently producing viral content can potentially attract attention from people completely outside crypto
Of course, millions of video views don't automatically translate into token buyers
But if Claudia continues developing into a recognizable AI character, that could become a relatively organic source of attention
4. Elon Musk has been the biggest catalyst behind the recent rally
The recent surge in solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM is closely connected to the attention generated by Elon Musk
On October 10, Elon published his "Super Persuasion" post, linking directly to a video created by @anabology
Before that, he had already interacted with the creator's Escape Velocity content in late September
Another interesting detail is that Elon Musk also follows @anabology on X, according to the information shared
This makes the connection even more interesting to me. We're not just talking about a random viral video that Elon happened to notice once
He's interacted with the creator's work multiple times, and the reported follow suggests an additional level of interest in his content
With anabology currently working on another Claudia video, this is definitely something worth keeping an eye on
However, there's an important distinction here
Elon follows and interacts with the creator, not necessarily the token itself. None of this should be interpreted as Elon endorsing solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM
Still, from a memecoin narrative perspective, having a creator whose work repeatedly catches Elon's attention is a pretty interesting advantage
The real question now is whether anabology can keep producing content good enough to maintain that attention
5. Creator fees and the "Fees fund future films" mechanism
This is probably my favorite part of the entire story
According to the information shared publicly, @anabology confirmed that he was receiving creator fees from the token through https://t.co/MDT1D8rHCr
He has also publicly disclosed multiple token purchases and locks through Streamflow
One reported lock involved approximately 936,874 CLAUDIA, with an unlock date of December 31, 2026
However, compared with the total supply of approximately 946M tokens, that particular lock represents only around 0.1% of supply
So I wouldn't exaggerate this by saying the creator has locked a significant percentage of the supply
What interests me more is the behavior and the idea behind it
The narrative the community is building is "Fees fund future films"
In simple terms, token trading generates creator fees, and those fees can potentially be used to finance future Claudia videos
If this continues, it could create an interesting feedback loop
Good content attracts attention, attention generates trading volume, trading volume produces creator fees, and those fees help fund more content
However, this model depends on the creator's decisions. It isn't an automated system that uses all trading fees to buy back tokens
So high trading volume doesn't necessarily mean the token price receives direct support from those fees
6. On-chain data and what has changed over the past few days
Based on the snapshots I've collected :
> The market cap initially sat at just a few thousand dollars before quickly moving above $1M
> On October 10, market cap fluctuated around $3.3–4.6M.
> By October 11, the token briefly surpassed $9M before fluctuating around $5.6–8.3M
> Holders increased from approximately 2.8–3K to more than 5.5–6K
> Daily trading volume reached several million dollars, exceeding $5M at certain points
These figures show how quickly capital and attention have flowed into the token
But I also want to emphasize that high volume doesn't necessarily mean sustainable buying pressure
For a memecoin that's only a few days old, volume can come from FOMO buyers, profit-taking, and short-term trading activity
What I want to monitor next is whether holder growth continues while the price consolidates, whether liquidity remains healthy, and whether people are still interested once the initial Elon catalyst starts fading
Those factors will help me determine whether solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM is actually building a community or simply experiencing a short-lived FOMO cycle
7. Another potential catalyst is already developing
After the Elon-driven rally, my biggest question is whether anabology can keep the attention going
According to his latest update, the new song is already finished, and the video is currently in production, with an expected timeline of roughly 1–2 days
He also mentioned scrapping two earlier videos to focus on making this one better
I find that pretty interesting
If the next video goes viral again, the Claudia narrative could have another reason to maintain momentum instead of relying entirely on Elon's previous post
There have also been discussions within some crypto communities suggesting that Marc Andreessen (a16z) may have noticed Claudia-related content
However, I haven't seen enough evidence to confirm any direct interaction with the token, so I'm not treating that as a verified catalyst
For me, the most concrete thing to watch is still anabology's upcoming video and how the community reacts once it's released
8. The open-character concept might be a more interesting long-term narrative than Elon
There's something I think people are overlooking while focusing entirely on the chart
Anabology is developing Claudia as an open character
Through https://t.co/g3Ux5gapGq, the community can access resources such as character sheets, skills, and related tools to create content around Claudia
If other creators start using Claudia in videos, artwork, or AI projects, the character could potentially grow beyond a single X account
This is where the Hatsune Miku comparison becomes interesting
The value of a cultural character doesn't necessarily come from having the most sophisticated technology
Sometimes it comes from an entire community continuously creating content around that character
Of course, Claudia is still nowhere near that level
And even if the character becomes successful, it doesn't automatically mean the token will capture all the value created by that success
But if you ask me which narrative is worth following beyond the short term, I'd choose Claudia's potential as an open AI character rather than simply betting on Elon tweeting again
9. Bull case and bear case for solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM
My bull case is fairly straightforward
Anabology continues producing high-quality content, the upcoming video gets a strong reception, creator fees help fund further production, and more people start creating content around Claudia
If those things happen together, the token could maintain attention longer than a typical memecoin built around a single catalyst
The creator acknowledging the token and publicly locking tokens is also a positive signal, since the community can at least track some of his actions
But the bear case is equally clear
The token has already experienced a massive rally in just a few days, and most of its current momentum is still driven by social attention
If the next video fails to generate similar interest, Elon doesn't interact again, or trading volume starts declining, selling pressure could appear very quickly
Another risk is that solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM doesn't have the automated treasury or buyback mechanisms found in the Agency version
The token depends heavily on anabology's activity and decisions
Also, the creator wasn't the person who originally launched this token
His acknowledgment and participation in creator fees establish a meaningful connection to the character, but they don't eliminate risks related to the original deployer, large wallets, or short-term speculative trading
So I wouldn't automatically equate Claudia's success as a character with future token price appreciation
10. My personal view and what I'm watching next
After going through the entire story, I actually like the solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM narrative quite a bit
Not because the chart has already pumped, but because there are several things here worth researching
The character existed before the token, the creator has demonstrated an ability to produce viral content, Elon has repeatedly shown interest in his work, and the creator is now participating in the token through fees and publicly disclosed locks
However, I still consider this a highly speculative memecoin rather than an AI project with fundamentals strong enough to justify a long-term valuation
At a market cap that has already multiplied several times from its early levels, I'm not interested in FOMOing simply because Elon posted something
I'd rather watch how the chart behaves after this rally, particularly whether liquidity, holder growth, and volume remain healthy once profit-taking begins
If we get a reasonable reset, volume stays alive, and the creator continues releasing new content, that would be a setup worth reassessing
On the other hand, if attention fades quickly, price loses important support levels, and no new catalysts emerge, I'm not going to force a thesis just because I like the story behind it
11. My final thesis
solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM sits at a pretty interesting intersection of AI content, the creator economy, and memecoin speculation
Elon helped bring significantly more attention to the narrative, but anabology is the person who will ultimately determine whether the Claudia story continues developing
And for me, the most important thing to watch isn't how many more times Elon might tweet about his content
It's whether Claudia can maintain attention even when Elon stops talking about it
That's the real test of this narrative
I'll continue watching solana:2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM, but at these levels, I'd rather wait for a setup with better R/R than chase candles that have already moved too far
2j5SaS7xy776qCBpyPQbZjyQSAtKiFgrwjfErthnW2ZM