Hatecaster

Somewhere, somehow, someone is dreaming of a better world.

AND YOU ARE NOT A PART OF IT.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

Screw it.

THE WORLD SHALL SEE IT

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

He could of said this with much more tact and accuracy.

In my family, there is virtually no female that is interested even remotely in video games. A fair amount of the males are. It is not because the males pushed them away from it either: In fact, they would love it if the women would join them, but the women are simply, frankly put, not interested.

But by far, it seems that people are skipping over the rest of what he said, in favor of criticizing him for the first six word and absolutely seeing nothing else. Which actually gives him much more vindication than anything else.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@elliereeves >Insists the government regulate everyone else more
>At the same time can't stop people from getting stabbed and beheaded on the streets

So, how's needing a license for everything working out for you?

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@pugandcorgi Really when you look at how good current AI is, it is...really all just a glorified search engine.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

Here is the real question: Why does mail in voting favor only democrats, and why do we accept this with zero actual data? If anything, I could make the reasonable assertation that mail in voting should actually favor republicans, as republicans tend to live in rural areas, thus have less access to voting because locations are much further away. As compared to democrats, which typically live in cities and usually have to just go a block or two.

In regards to the vote, what we should really be looking at is the statistical anomaly. It is clearly highly anomalous that Raman suddenly got a gigantic surge of votes, when she could not even win in her own district. Bass and Pratt on the other hand largely are flat, while her curve simply exploded, enough to knock Pratt out.

I'ma say this: Who does this benefit? Bass. There is zero way Raman is going to win over Bass. But Pratt had a decent chance of doing so. And they knew it. Watch this: During the general election, Raman's sudden voting surge she received this time will absolutely fail to materialize.

Now, on other things, the funny part is that you think this is making people lose respect for 'conservatives' when nations run by friggen dictators in Africa are sitting there looking at Cali like "what the dog doing lol"

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

This shows a lack of...well, even acknowledging how most people think in this post. Imagine, you are a super elite blackhat hacker. Before you, lay two paths.

A: Delete all student loans ever, and get every. Single. Nation with a bank on your ass, throwing every single resource at you because, well, banks and government, or...

B: You scam/ransomware the fuck out of mid-tier corps that at the most only have a regional impact, and get millions of dollars, which allows you to pay off your student loans, assuming you have any, anyways.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

Ah yes. The morality of poverty working in inverse. Clearly, the CEO is a honest upstanding citizen because he has money, and the 'random out-of-towners' that don't have millions of dollars are in the wrong because they don't have millions of dollars.

Either that, or this is a highly insular community.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@feminazzzzi I absolutely see the problem. Improper grammar. Did not actually answer 'team building experience' question. Granted, this is not all your brother's fault, as it seems that businesses are trying their best to destroy all entry level jobs right now.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@PeladoNerd The reason why AI will never be profitable is because their current model is centralized, ultimately depending on them dumping money into all sorts of shit and running it all themselves all because their CEOs want to rule the world with their man-made psychopathic horror robot.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@EmilySm43 MEGADESTRUCTOR, SHATTERER OF HOPES

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

And now, somehow, someway, magically, the democratic party is in debt.

HRM.

Where oh where were they getting all that money from?

[Sen. Bernie Sanders @SenSanders]

Elon Musk, the wealthiest man alive, gutted USAID, which supports some of the poorest people in the world.

Now there's an Ebola outbreak in the Congo, which USAID could have helped prevent or slow.

When you dismantle the systems that stop deadly diseases, people needlessly die.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@GeraltofGoonia I've played the game. Game is actually a damned good game. This is, legit, one of the few times they got it right and proved that a broken clock is right twice a day.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@Grummz Don't take X seriously. If anything, I use X to shitpost some and argue with strangers.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

For all we know he was going to try to figure out more intel on AI stuff. Ironically, the anti-AI crowd repeatedly shoots itself in the foot again and again. Many have fooled themselves into thinking they are winning, when really it's the fact that THE CLANKERS are becoming much harder to detect.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@gharkekalesh Dude was walking, than the dogs surrounded him in what looks like clear pack-hunting behavior. Without further context, it is very clear that he was defending himself.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@YachtClubGames Mina is absolutely a great game. Amazing game. I have already recommended it to all my friends tbh.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@TheAmerican_io @mattvanswol This is among the most clear cases of it not being a normal peaceful protest.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

Mr. Obvious does have a point here: Thieves do tend to think everyone steals. If you look at most creative processes however, or at least the actual genesis of it, exposure is needed for creation, therefore one can argue that furrys are stealing everything from medieval art or looney toons.

In fact, with that argument, there is only one actual legit pure art form.

What is needed is that you have to throw a person out into the wilds, with zero exposure to any sort of media, You can supply them with food and everything, but you can expose them to no art whatsoever. Than, you give them a piece of paper and art supplies, and tell them to go at it.

Why do I go this far? Because with the actual argument that many of the anti-AI art crowd is using...well, they know FULL and DAMN WELL their argument is flawed, and they are more worried, rightfully so, about keeping their job than anything else. But they're absolutely willing to shit up everything else in the process. They know FULL well they grab references on the regular, you know, ironically LIKE AN AI, before they start. Not many can even do it from no visual aids at all.

Soon, the only actual difference between a human artist and a AI generation prompt will be sample size. And the human artist is the one, by default working with the much smaller sample size.

The only things humans DO actually have on LLMs and Art AIs is creativity, and in some regards the ability to filter information or be absolutely unhinged, for as good or flawed that it may be with those people. And soon, if they figure out the LLM problem...which, luckily for all of you, they likely won't, but if they DO figure it out, that'll go out the window too.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@Grummz Yeah, I've basically reached that conclusion as well. I know a few musicians and quite a few artists: All but one are using AI now, and even the dude that is not using AI is eyeing up AI like it's the newest toy on the block.

They will NEVER admit openly they are using AI.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

Now, this seems great, until they go into slumlord mode, in which case good luck even touching them because every time the city threatens them due to shitbaggery they threaten to pull out however massive chunk of money they are paying in taxes.

You actually just want a good landlord.

[Hatecaster @Hatecaster1]

@madaomoshiroi BEHOLD

RATMASTER!