Sen. @timkaine: Was the 2024 presidential election rigged?
Trump Nominee: President Trump won the 2024 presidential election.
Kaine: He was asked twice if the 2020 election was rigged and he wouldn't answer the question. You answered so easily when I asked you the question about 2024. The fact that you were unable to give the simple answer about 2020 raises serious questions.
It must be a breath of fresh air for people like @SwipeWright to have finally brought the meritocracy back to the Oval Office. No more political or ideological games! Thank goodness DEI died for this!!
https://t.co/BuH4as5nvz
“Michelle Obama is a man” shouted on the White House lawn in a ring sponsored by Bud Light only available on Larry Ellison’s Paramount Plus. What a way to celebrate America 250 and the twilight of liberal democracy.
JFK once invited to dinner 49 Nobel laureates, Robert Frost, William Styron, Ernest Hemingway, James Baldwin, Katherine Anne Porter, John Dos Passos, James Farrell and Lionel and Diana Trilling, and others. His line on the occasion became famous: “I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together at the White House—with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone."
Some of you were alive when that happened.
@SwipeWright Are you claiming that these people don't use their "wealth" in ways that escape typical progressive tax structures for their would be marginal tax rate??
Your argument is just as or more reductive.
What Gabbard has released is neither new nor news—she just lends her imprimatur as outgoing DNI to her wrongheaded and tendentious interpretation, which predates her government role and serves a hostile foreign country’s interest.
The Defense Threat Reduction Agency started in Ukraine in 2005 and not in secret. These are Ukrainian-owned facilities that do local disease surveillance. “BTRP sponsors no gain of function research or ‘human experimentation.’”
The U.S. Embassy in Kyiv talks about them.
https://t.co/iJJ7GQ0Bx8
See also this: https://t.co/SWrBPluC7Z
And this: https://t.co/kYdlFx52U5
New Bricks and Minifigs / Legally Mine Investigation tool now live at https://t.co/0Y5aMxEDfK (TWO FF) My theory is that we can focus on the court cases near the founding of new entities to extract as many nuggets at a lower cost per nugget. There is a TON of court cases and they cost money to open. Enjoy. Fuck the McNeff Crime Family LLC and go rip them a new one!
Incredible. Publishing what appears to be (if you care to read the "evidence") a totally legitimate US program, and even citing the risks of these being used as "Russian information campaigns", Tulsi Gabbard - the gift that kept giving - presents the Kremlin with yet one more information operation.
Read our investigation from 2025 where we presented evidence that the hybrid ops unit of GRU's 29155 came up with the whole "bio-labs" concept - and co-opted Tulsi into it. https://t.co/D8qdE38ahv
@HeyItsVadim@tweetsfromstar You seriously don't believe what you wrote but it is obvious why he didn't sue Destiny and it has absolutely nothing to do with this bullshit.
How come there are no conspiracy theories about Maine's very slow ranked-choice tallying?
It's almost as if it's not the slowness of the count, per se, that gives rise to these theories so much as it is people deliberately lying.
@PigtailsW6713@ThatRetiredDude@coffeebreak_YT I think that is probably closer to the truth at least for BAM. For the new owners, there is definitely some shady stuff going on..
For BAM, them doubling down on lies and supporting the new owners who it looks like they were buddies with.. I think that's where things break down.
@ThatRetiredDude@PigtailsW6713@coffeebreak_YT I'm saying Coffee unfortunately left out a lot of the evidence of how uncooperative both the new owner and BAM were with Brian. Which is a huge contradiction to their story of playing stupid. That evidence is proof positive for Crystal being innocent.
@PigtailsW6713@ThatRetiredDude@coffeebreak_YT Actually tried to make things right with Brian initially, maybe you're point would make more sense. Because they could say, see, we don't have the inventory or the tracking, it was the previous owners, go after them.
Instead they told Brian to lawyer up.
@PigtailsW6713@ThatRetiredDude@coffeebreak_YT What @coffeebreak_YT leaves out unfortunately is Brian's initial attempts to reconcile the accounting of the existing sets. The Josh guy who took over the store literally told Brian to back off, lied multiple times and Corporate covered for him. Let's say Josh and Corp ....
the most sophisticated election fraud operation in American history was carried about by Donald Trump in 2020 when he coordinated across multiple states to submit fraudulent Electoral College votes to Congress in an attempt to overturn or stall the certification of results
@katrosenfield Twitter is not my job, so I often "come back". Kids gotta get to dance!
It felt like you took Mike's post, which is misleading (perception v evidence), as a jumping off point to say "California should not be allowed to run its elections like this"
But my bad. Have a good day
@katrosenfield This is the point: https://t.co/8WlNJCAtcb
The issue right now isn't how elections are run, it is who is or isn't happy with them. We could pass the SAVE act right now and if Dems won, Trump would cry foul. The integrity ? is downstream from Trumps influence on perceptions.
Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase:
"We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament.
No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good.
So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily.
Can you prove it? No.
And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident.
That is not an accident.
And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that.
The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on."
@BretWeinstein
Get ready to give your dog kisses and some days later be blowing worms out of your nose because Elon and his degenerates decided that a flesh eating worm wasnt a big deal and cut the government funding to keep it in check.
Be mad at the right people this time.
@katrosenfield I appreciate the engagement. I really don't play team sports and try my best to look at things through empiricism. Using Trump as a spring board is playing team sports, imo.
Have a good rest of your day!
@katrosenfield The point is:
(1) There would be little based on the facts of how elections are run in Cali
(2) Trump constantly lies about election results driving the conversation
(3) Cali does likely need some election reform
(4) Conservatives are most often in the way of Vote Day/ID ease