High "Kick" Harry

“I'm smart enough to know that I'm dumb.”
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard P Feynman

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@SimonHoneydew He looks like a sweet little guy.

What ever happened to Orangina, your daughter?

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@LauraRbnsn His dead relatives did disappear when he dropped the stone though. But as per my other reply, I think it's still fair to say; yes he did have all three.

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@LauraRbnsn Yeah, that's fair then. Draco then Harry were master of the elder wand while V had it in his possession.
By the same logic Harry would also still have the stone, and of course his cloak... So, complete collection.

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@LauraRbnsn OMG VoldeRmort, hjaha! I failed to notice that stupid error

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@LauraRbnsn Voldermort used the elder wand to kill Harry, and Harry had discarded the resurrection stone as he approached Voldemort. Harry did have the cloak stuffed underneath his robes though. Therefore he has never carried all three at the same.

The mastering death thing, I take as myth

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

understandable since you haven't encountered all their talking points. And it's hard when he's just shotgunning terms he doesn't understand.

The most laughable was his understanding of what's natural... literally everything within the universe is natural including manmade things

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

.@TJump_ just watched your discussion with Davey on MDD. Damn, is he an insufferable arrogant ignorant cunt. People like him are the only ones that trigger me... FUCK!

Though I also felt some of your answers to his "gotchas" left lacking,

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@Leophilius Yeah, I know, thought the inb4 would give it away that I was not serious.

I'm agnostic, I can't justify answering either way on the proposition.

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@Leophilius Dude, it may sound stupid but there's always another day to die. Today is not the day!

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

Seeing "homosexuality" is trending, I'd just like to remind people that there's no cure, since there's nothing to be cured. Just because something is the societal norm doesn't mean something outside of it needs "curing".

https://t.co/ymNxyQ4IPW @AURORAmusic

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@AURORAmusic 🖤

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

Seeing "homosexuality" is trending, I'd just like to remind people that there's no cure, since there's nothing to be cured. Just because something is the societal norm doesn't mean something outside of it needs "curing".

https://t.co/ymNxyQ4IPW @AURORAmusic

[AURORA @AURORAmusic]

✨ CURE FOR ME - OUT NOW ✨
I feel like the whole world Is trying to convince you something is wrong with you. And sadly often people believe this to be true. It is very frightening how easy it is for someone to convince you that you are wrong. https://t.co/PQcji1axt3

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@Alliste35661241 @cgp42 @BissetteHunter @CosmicSkeptic I wonder when the term theological non-cognitivist was first used, maybe after him.
To explain:
Is the sentence"God exists" a proposition?
If one answers no(saying it has no meaning), then they may be considered non-cognitivist. Atheist, theist, agnostic are cognitivist positions

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@cgp42 @BissetteHunter @CosmicSkeptic But a person can BELIEVE that that claim is true, and could probably give good reasons for it.
One doesn't need to PROVE anything.
In philosophy, having a burden of proof only means one has to justify, give the reasons why one believes a claim.
Not any god, a theistic god.

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@cgp42 @BissetteHunter @CosmicSkeptic Though I come close, I don't think I can justify it to myself completely. Hence why I call myself agnostic. 3/3

[High "Kick" Harry @HighKickHarry1]

@cgp42 @BissetteHunter @CosmicSkeptic because it seems there's no god(s) required to explain (insert observed phenomena)" It's a small/weak example and I'm agnostic, but adding common atheist arguments like "The Problem of Suffering", and "The Problem of Divine Hiddenness" certainly goes a long way for me. 2/3