@RealCandaceO What do you mean, “some technicality?” You said that Erika “peeled off” from Charlie’s funeral to take a phone call. Now you’re saying that was just you making stuff up?
What a repulsive thing to lie about.
Pay attention.
There’s a reason none of the big influencers are showing you any of this.
I encourage you yet again to follow an account that actually UNDERSTANDS what Trump and team doing, altering dramatically the the worldwide financial infrastructure the Transnational Criminal Syndicate **used to be able to hide inside of**… and now **no longer can.**
All of those influencers endlessly wailing to you about how nothing is happening to ‘the Epstein class’ for the last year and a half either do not know what is actually going on, or they are hiding it from you.
TPUSA's loan amount on Charlie Kirk's split life insurance policy doubled to $700K in 2025, and then a few months later, Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
And for anyone who thinks this is normal, it absolutely isn't. Split-dollar life insurance is a tool used by hospitals and universities to retain senior, near-retirement executives. TPUSA used it on its 31-year-old founder. That's not a normal use case and almost unheard of in the 501c3 world. Also can trigger and audit.
The fact they aren't looking into Erika Kirk as his spouse who has made more than $50M since his death is INSANE. If anyone knows the insurance company, email me ([email protected]). I have an idea, but need to confirm. Your name stays out of it, obviously. But I can't imagine they are going to give up the money that easily, unless it's all connected.....
We are better off without Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Megyn Kelly, Shawn Ryan, Nick Fuentes, and whoever else is a Doomer (leftist in disguise) casted out of our movement.
The commented to this, and all of your posts, are very telling: you respond to comment regarding yours or @charliekirk11 “state of mind” or “reasoning” or “strategy” - all subjective concepts, but never respond when presented with facts
This is another great example of how Candace either doesn't know, or doesn't care, how Charlie actually lived his life.
She ridicules the idea that Charlie would talk to people like @josh_hammer or rabbis about how to frame arguments on Israel before debates, because he was "smarter" than them. Instead, they must have been threatening him, she says.
Well, I was a part of that prep work, and they weren't threatening him. Instead, it really was just debate prep. Charlie always knew he could be better and was eager to get advice and guidance from other people he thought could help him. He was so successful not because he was innately smarter than everyone, but rather because he had so much humility.
I can see how Candace might be unable to relate to a person like that.
@LoriZH57@baroncoleman Apparently you don’t watch @baroncoleman - he’s always stated TR was involved but was a patsy not the mastermind and acting alone, whether he knew it or not
A few months ago, I started digging through old live recordings.
Some were board feeds.
Some were rehearsal recordings.
Some were recordings from shows that meant a lot to me.
The problem wasn't that they sounded terrible.
They sounded... almost good.
Good enough to know there was something worth saving.
Not good enough to enjoy listening to.
So I built LiveSetRescue.
Upload a recording, and LiveSetRescue analyzes it for common issues like muddiness, imbalance, lack of clarity, weak low end, harshness, and other things that often keep live recordings from sounding their best.
You can accept the suggestions, adjust them, or add your own.
Then comes the part I like most.
Instead of chasing "perfect," you choose how you want the recording to feel.
Maybe you want the warmth of a small club.
Maybe you want the energy of a live arena show.
Maybe you want something smooth and cohesive.
Maybe you just want more openness and clarity.
Once the rescue is complete, you can instantly compare the original recording against the restored version and decide for yourself if it was worth it.
No subscription.
No account.
No commitment.
If you like what you hear, take it home for $1.99.
If not, you've lost nothing but a few minutes.
LiveSetRescue was built for musicians, bands, worship teams, rehearsal spaces, and anyone with recordings that deserve another listen.
Because sometimes a recording doesn't need to be remastered.
It just needs to be brought back to life.
https://t.co/enQbKhvMyp
I'd love feedback, even if you don't purchase anything.
A few months ago, I started digging through old live recordings.
Some were board feeds.
Some were rehearsal recordings.
Some were recordings from shows that meant a lot to me.
The problem wasn't that they sounded terrible.
They sounded... almost good.
Good enough to know there was something worth saving.
Not good enough to enjoy listening to.
So I built LiveSetRescue.
Upload a recording, and LiveSetRescue analyzes it for common issues like muddiness, imbalance, lack of clarity, weak low end, harshness, and other things that often keep live recordings from sounding their best.
You can accept the suggestions, adjust them, or add your own.
Then comes the part I like most.
Instead of chasing "perfect," you choose how you want the recording to feel.
Maybe you want the warmth of a small club.
Maybe you want the energy of a live arena show.
Maybe you want something smooth and cohesive.
Maybe you just want more openness and clarity.
Once the rescue is complete, you can instantly compare the original recording against the restored version and decide for yourself if it was worth it.
No subscription.
No account.
No commitment.
If you like what you hear, take it home for $1.99.
If not, you've lost nothing but a few minutes.
LiveSetRescue was built for musicians, bands, worship teams, rehearsal spaces, and anyone with recordings that deserve another listen.
Because sometimes a recording doesn't need to be remastered.
It just needs to be brought back to life.
https://t.co/enQbKhvMyp
I'd love feedback, even if you don't purchase anything.
.@charliekirk11 was never just a mouthpiece for the @Republicans.
He was a bold voice, pushing for unity in a fractured nation, while staying rooted in the Scriptures.
He was a force pushing for radical, honest change that transcended party lines. That’s why he poured everything into getting @realDonaldTrump elected.
He believed we would finally see the system broken and rebuilt for the people. We all did. That’s what made the movement so inspiring to begin with.
It is beyond tragic to watch the very administration he helped empower, and worked to get elected, abandon those very clear promises and flip on nearly every core issue he stood for.
Perhaps that’s why a voice like his could no longer be allowed to speak.
It’s a shame. I once followed Gary unactical. It’s really unfathomable how you can intently watch every one of her episodes, and somehow miss the receipts provided. Your determination to prove just how dense you are is commendable
The Candace Owens Content Farming Through Extortion Business Model:
1) Anonymous sources - Trust me bro
2) Unverifiable Information - Trust me bro
3) Accuse the innocent while providing no evidence
4) Defame the accused, incite a mob, and force them to prove their innocence
5) Reject any proof of innocence
6) Rinse and repeat
.@BlakeSNeff would have you believe we “cannot possibly know for sure how @charliekirk11 would have reacted to this conflict” in Iran….
Well, I pulled the clip so you don’t have to. It aired on June 17, 2025 — almost exactly one year ago.
Stop letting @BlakeSNeff be the arbiter of what Charlie wouldn’t say when the footage isn’t even 12 months old. Do not let them erase his voice that easily.
In this segment, Charlie goes off on the failed neocon approach, calling regime change in Iran “pathologically insane”
“This has nothing to do with nuclear weapons at this point, this is, we want to go in and take out the Regime […] and that sounds good, but that’s pathologically insane. I’m sorry. It is. How do you know it’s going to be better?”
“Regime change is not like changing the head coach on the Chicago Bears. That’s not how it works.”
Charlie’s stance couldn’t be clearer: strong rhetorical threats? Yes. Kinetic warfare and another Middle East quagmire? No.
He even praised the “underrepresented” Ron Paul isolationist approach, and said it’s “not our job to police the Strait of Hormuz.”
I’m not sure why @BlakeSNeff feels the need to overcomplicate things and deny his late friend’s own words… when he could just play. the. clip.
Especially when, right after Charlie’s death, Blake sat feet away from @MrsErikaKirk as she assured the country that they had decades of footage and would happily use it to answer these exact sort of questions.
So why the word salad now instead of just playing the clips, Blake? 🤔 Seems like his stance was pretty clear to me.
Again, I’m just listening to my friends voice, and asking reasonable questions. You should have no problem with that, right?
#GaryUntactical - please let the adults speak. You have become a running joke…do yourself a favor and stop feeding the fire…and learn how to tactically define your position instead of the idiocy you spew
Candace has an established pattern of withholding information, evidence, and omitting facts to preserve the narratives that make her money.
She held onto video footage from behind Charlie for months.
On Dec. 15, Erika gave her information proving Brian Harpole wasn’t at Ft. Huachuca. She didn’t mention it until long after her Dec. 18 interview with Mitch Snow, and only after being called out.
That’s not journalism; that’s narrative forming.
On January 21, she confirmed that a donor told her Charlie named Erika as his successor during the Aspen event.
Now she says she had the Aspen footage for 7 months.
No objective person can reconcile these facts and conclude she isn’t lying and intentionally omitting critical information to exploit people for clicks, views, and money.
Imagine cackling with contempt because somebody is quoting Scripture to admonish your behavior.
Well, actually, you don’t have to imagine it, if you’re Candace.
Lol so Candace was sitting on the entire Aspen video for months & pretending she hadn't seen it? And you guys in her audience are... ok with that? So much for transparency and letting the public see all the "evidence" 😂😂😂😂😂😂 what a fraud.