Shervin Adam

social media activist, news observer, #EndVaanuvaa, #FreePalestine, RTs ≠ endorsements

[Adam Ahmad @adam_ahmadh]

Meanwhile fenaka saeed is serving his sentence at home. All animals are equal , but some are more equal than others. The rich and powerful gets away no matter what. Where is Adeeb? What happen to MMPRC scandal?

[Shervin Adam @Hiyerlu]

@nocapmuslim @MMuizzu @rekibeyya Didn’t mention that you were but if you are defending then there’s definitely some reason i guess.

[Shervin Adam @Hiyerlu]

Bro has already lost hope in @MMuizzu and his mind has transitioned to a new gov. @rekibeyya 😂

[Unstoppable @nocapmuslim]

We started talking about this in 2008. It became an election promise, and now it's only half-implemented. Hopefully, the next government will fix this entire situation.

[Shervin Adam @Hiyerlu]

Comparing Al-Shara to Muawiyah RA and Afghan mujahidin is a mockery. It is one thing to have a truce with for example America and completely different thing to give allegiance to them, praise them, and follow them to the lizard’s hole.

[Syrian Strategist @Syria_Strategy]

Politics is not as childish as some people imagine.

An agreement with an enemy does not automatically mean loyalty to that enemy.

A truce does not mean surrender.
A delay in battle does not mean permanent submission.

And the refusal to fight immediately does not prove that a ruler has become a puppet.

Even in early Islamic history, Muawiyah ibn Abi Sufyan (RA) purchased a truce with the Byzantines during the civil war in order to free his hand for the struggle against Ali; once he secured his position, he curtailed the tribute and resumed almost yearly expeditions against Byzantium.

The point is obvious.

Serious rulers do not fight every enemy at once, on every front, at every moment, simply to satisfy the emotions of spectators. They sequence threats. They buy time. They consolidate internally. They neutralize one danger so they can deal with another from a stronger position.

That is not treason.
That is statecraft.

The same logic appeared in modern times as well. The anti-Soviet mujahideen in Afghanistan were armed by the United States and others during one phase of conflict, yet that did not produce permanent alignment or everlasting obedience.

Later alignments shifted, enemies changed, and yesterday’s tactical overlap became tomorrow’s confrontation. That is not unusual in politics. It is normal.

So when people say, “If Ahmad al-Sharaa makes some arrangement, or avoids immediate war, that proves he has kowtowed forever,” they are thinking like children.

No, it does not prove that.

It proves only that politics has stages.

That rulers sometimes postpone one confrontation to survive another.
That agreements can be temporary, conditional, and instrumental.
And that what matters is not the existence of a tactical understanding in one moment, but the larger direction of power over time.

A man who pauses is not necessarily conquered. A man who negotiates is not necessarily owned. A man who delays battle is not necessarily domesticated.

Sometimes he is simply waiting for history to move into a more favorable configuration.

This is why shallow minds always misread political restraint as submission. They cannot distinguish between strategy and surrender.

But history can.

And history has shown, more than once, that a ruler may sign with one hand in one phase, and strike with the other in another.

Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan is one of the clearest examples.

At a moment when the Umayyad state was threatened both internally and externally, he made what many would have called a humiliating arrangement with the Byzantines. Why? Because he understood a truth that emotional people never understand: you do not fight every battle at once simply to impress spectators.

He neutralized one front, crushed the greater internal danger, reunified the state, rebuilt his position, and then, once the balance had changed, the truce ended and the Romans were defeated at Sebastopolis in 692.

There is a lesson in that.

An agreement is not always allegiance.

A pause is not always surrender.
A tactical accommodation is not permanent obedience.

And a ruler who does not rush into battle at the most emotionally satisfying moment is not therefore a puppet.

This is as true in modern politics as it was in the Umayyad age.

The same principle applies now.

If Ahmad al-Sharaa makes arrangements, avoids premature confrontation, or prioritizes rebuilding and internal consolidation first, that does not prove he has permanently bowed to Israel, nor that he will serve its interests indefinitely.
It proves only that serious rulers understand sequence.

First, survive.
Then consolidate.
Then build.
Then choose your moment.

Children think every delay is betrayal.

History teaches that sometimes delay is exactly what makes future strength possible.

[Shervin Adam @Hiyerlu]

@AtwaniTimbs @ikrimah114 Ohh so you if you don’t have the ability to stop then you must join them. Congrats, you are officially a toy in the hands of the Coalition.

[Rekibeyya @rekibeyya]

This is the mentality of many Maldivian. For the last 3 ish yrs, neither they worked to fix the system nor they tried to find a good leader. Instead they wait for the presidential vote & say, "we got 2 evils, no option but to choose the lesser evil."

No effort to find No evil.

[Youth for Unity @y4unitymv]

~Zuvaanunge Space~

Title: D̶h̶i̶v̶e̶h̶i̶ Raajje- Gaanoonu Asaasee Nuhigaagothah Bin Vikkanee!

Date & Time :20/06/2026(Saturday), 20:45

Join us and let us know your opinions!

#SEZ_huttaalaa
#No2SEZ

[Rekibeyya @rekibeyya]

Even yoosay was not able to imagine these. His predictions were flat, jetty & airport. Ribbon cutting ceremony for a scanner was not a level he could even think of. 😂

[Shervin Adam @Hiyerlu]

Muizzu could have easily secured a 2nd term if he delivered on his promises (like #EndVaanuvaa) but instead messed up big time by handing over his mind to people like Ihusaan, who played with Muizzu like a toy while building his own political profile.

[Unstoppable @nocapmuslim]

For now, the only option against @MohamedNasheed is Muizzu, which means I cannot support anyone else. Even if he has completely failed, I still see him as the better choice. In my view, nobody is worse than supporters of Zionism or Israel.

[Nashaath Ahmad @NaShaathu]

Lowkey chinese agent supports social media ban and their social credit system.

[Muhammad Waheed @Bugatti_1900]

I attended the XSpace organized by @y4unitymv regarding the social media ban, and it was hilarious when @WhoIsFishie had to school @malshasharyf on what it really means and what security risks it poses. She lives in graceful ignorance. Her motto "ignorance is bliss" So...

[Shervin Adam @Hiyerlu]

@rekibeyya Zaeemism inn raajje salaamatheh nuvi. Same shit different faces.

[Rekibeyya @rekibeyya]

Insaafuveri, transparent vote akun ves hovey meeha aki cult leader ah vedhaane. Eynage mentality aki no one else but me. It was quite clear from WA messages. Ppl who blindly follow him refuse to accept how he behaves when he gets or lose power. Like a cult.

[Shervin Adam @Hiyerlu]

🤷‍♂️

[Azzam @strangerfrommv]

އެމްޑީޕީގެ ރަސްމީ ލާދީނީކަމާއި ސަހްޔޫނީކަން

[Nashaath Ahmad @NaShaathu]

Old bitches acting like teens. "When level is up" 🤣

[Nashaath Ahmad @NaShaathu]

PrOtEct ChIldRen,
baN SociaL apPs,
But ShOw ShAkirĀ's A$$

[Shervin Adam @Hiyerlu]

Kaamiyaabee ge feshunves othee DJ party akun.

[MV Noos Breaking @MVNoosBreaking]

މިހާތަނަށް ގުނި ވޯޓުން އެމްޑީޕީގެ ޗެއަރޕާސަންކަން ލާދީނީ އަންނި ކާމިޔާބު ކުރާނެ ކަމަށް ބެލެވިއްޖެ

[Aishath Zahukko @Zahukko]

ކޮންމެ ބައަކަށްވެސް އަނެކުން ކުރީމަ ގޯސް ކަމަކަށް ވަނީ، އާންމުމީހާ މިހާލުން ސަލާމަތްކުރަން އެދެވޭ މަސައްކަތެއް އިހްލާސްތެރިކަމާއެކު ކުރާ އެއްބައެއްވެސް ނެތް.
ކުށެއް ސާބިތުނުވާ، ލޭބަލްއެއް ބޮލުގަ އެޅުނީތީ ކިތައްމީހުން މިހާލުގަ ވާނުވާގަ އެބަތިބިތޯ؟

[Unaish Ahmed @unaishoo]

The condition of Maldivian prisons and the inhumane treatment prisoners get has been talked on for years now. Listen to this video by Journalist @MohamedShahzan ⬇️ #EndVaanuvaa