Oh hell naw

EA

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@k_bi11 @MABBY314 @WarThunder They could idk decompress BR to let WW2 JP shit be at their own BR, or make it possible to start the TT in early CW instead of WW2
Either way not an issue if we're talking realism, the game itself promotes realism so Ho-Ri would be by their own definition, unrealistic

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@k_bi11 @MABBY314 @WarThunder ??????? I don't even play WT what are you on about???
It matters a lot considering the best they could do was with WOOD, not even a metal mock-up
The game itself advertises itself as "Realistic Military Vehicles" so by their own words this would be accurate.

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@k_bi11 @MABBY314 @WarThunder when I talk about a mock-up, I'm talking about an ACTUAL, metal mock-up that has a few things that work, unlike these wodden mock-ups
The whole of WW2 Japan lacked ARMOR IRL, there's no defending this shit.

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@k_bi11 @MABBY314 @WarThunder >"keep it as realistic as possible"
>vehicle never existed in the first place
not to mention "production" variant is completely fucking paper considering they couldn't even finish the "prototype"
I'd also be fine if they wanted to remove all the other fake vehicles

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@MABBY314 @WarThunder not a single actual mock-up of Ho-Ri exists, they've *ONLY* managed to make a wooden mock-up with nothing working in it

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@_Akaeru @SimbolonLionel does he know?

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@BlankfactYes @multicrewtank Demo slop 💀💀💀💀

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@BlankfactYes @multicrewtank No???? What export 2A4 has that??
Even then, T1 2A4 is quite literally just 2A4, not any export mods

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@GuyYoung436461 @multicrewtank Wouldn't matter, UFP will actually bounce though unlike before

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@BlankfactYes @multicrewtank .... 2A7HU's have them + "PSO" Kit

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@thugner101 I am schizo as hell then

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@GZsgallos2007 something something "4th gen tank" something something

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@federal_cw @GZsgallos2007 True yeah

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@T80Bvm2019 @DrArgentina1816 @rawmeatrot No, it would just be a worse Type 10
It doesn't have working Arena, and the proposed hull never existed, nor was the IRL prototype was ever seen to mount Drozd like the proposed model did.

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@T80Bvm2019 @rawmeatrot It won't be in War Thunder lmfao

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@Nhifan27 @Nebuchanedzar_I There are no "B+"
C/CEs are their own thing, although B was once referred to as "early C batches"
Bs are all AL-31F powered, while CEs are WS-10B (Batch 6+), C/CEs also have a spinal datalink antenna that Bs lack, B also uses a different radar
Only PL-8/12 for B

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@The_armando30 @_Locke_XX @__CJohnston__ NASA ≠ USAF or USN, and even then it just doesn't fit, considering how tall the pylon for it is and how big the missile is.

[Oh hell naw @HolUpWhat_16]

@AlvinYap510 @RupprechtDeino .....They use WS-10Bs, 10Cs are.J-20 specific