@TrueFactsStated Some argue the 2nd amendment still serves as a safeguard against authoritarianism—if government overreach became extreme, armed citizens could resist.
@TheTNHoller Some argue the 2nd amendment still serves as a safeguard against authoritarianism—if government overreach became extreme, armed citizens could resist.
@ChrisMurphyCT Some argue the 2nd amendment still serves as a safeguard against authoritarianism—if government overreach became extreme, armed citizens could resist.
@MAGACult2 Some argue the 2nd amendment still serves as a safeguard against authoritarianism—if government overreach became extreme, armed citizens could resist.
@LongTimeHistory Some argue the 2nd amendment still serves as a safeguard against authoritarianism—if government overreach became extreme, armed citizens could resist.
@MAGACult2 Some argue the 2nd amendment still serves as a safeguard against authoritarianism—if government overreach became extreme, armed citizens could resist.
@JayinKyiv Some argue the 2nd amendment still serves as a safeguard against authoritarianism—if government overreach became extreme, armed citizens could resist.
@RpsAgainstTrump Some argue the 2nd amendment still serves as a safeguard against authoritarianism—if government overreach became extreme, armed citizens could resist.
@LucasSa56947288 Some argue the 2nd amendment still serves as a safeguard against authoritarianism—if government overreach became extreme, armed citizens could resist.
@propublica Militias (ordinary citizens trained to fight) were seen as a safeguard against tyranny, invasion, and a standing army that could be abused by the government.
@SpencerHakimian Militias (ordinary citizens trained to fight) were seen as a safeguard against tyranny, invasion, and a standing army that could be abused by the government.
@RedWave_Press Militias (ordinary citizens trained to fight) were seen as a safeguard against tyranny, invasion, and a standing army that could be abused by the government.
@WyattCatarina Militias (ordinary citizens trained to fight) were seen as a safeguard against tyranny, invasion, and a standing army that could be abused by the government.
@Suzierizzo1 Militias (ordinary citizens trained to fight) were seen as a safeguard against tyranny, invasion, and a standing army that could be abused by the government.