My novel *Rabbits* is out today in paperback.
I feel you should definitely buy it.
Here are some of the lovely things readers have said about it over the last few months.
@alanmonolith Ach, no. Thanks but it definitely helped. People remember you and are perhaps more interested. But I think that direct benefit probably expired in my case a couple of decades ago.
It's easy to say "I regret it happened but tempers were high." He doesn't say that because he doesn't regret it. Jenrick wants to be Chancellor. There is no other party with figures at this level who would express open delight at their political opponents being beaten up.
'What did you expect them to do?'
Robert Jenrick reacts to footage of Reform conference attendees manhandling a protestor, and claims he has 'no sympathy'.
@Lewis_Goodall
@Laocailarry That is, in fact, more accurate. My work was read by a commissioning editor at The Times of about my age who encouraged me to freelance. I'd also never met Neil. I got my job at that website because they were desperate for writers and my flatmate worked in the office next door.
@Laocailarry I mean, it's immaterial because that's not remotely how it happened. But even if it had been, what would have been in it for them? He was one ex cabinet minister among many. Why bother?
@Laocailarry That would have been much easier. Alas, it didn't work like that. I'm also not sure why on Earth they'd have said "yes" given he wasn't even an MP by then. It's very easy to see how my career began and has progressed by using things like Google. By all means have a go.
@Laocailarry Indeed we're not. One key difference is that you have to completely make up quotes and views for me in order to make a point. Whereas I can just quote your guy directly.
@DAaronovitch I've been worrying about this all day and I'm just not sure that crack dealing and goatherding are synergistic professions. The crackheads would have to hike up a mountain. Otherwise, who buys the crack? Goats?
@scribblercat I absolutely agree, tho, that the distinctions between those different disciplines should often be far more rigorous and obvious than they are.
@scribblercat Of course, but it's also not always supposed to. I mean, I know I *would* say this, but many things - polemic, satire, analysis, advocacy - have a place in papers alongside reporting. I tend to think it's all "journalism" by virtue of being there. Tho that's semantics, I suppose.